Provider-Targeted Behavioral Interventions to Prevent Unsafe Opioid Prescribing for Acute Pain in Primary Care
2 other identifiers
interventional
22,616
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators will assess whether behavioral science-based interventions can "nudge" providers towards more evidence-based care for patients with acute non-cancer pain. Aim 1) Among opioid naïve primary care patients with acute non-cancer pain, compare the effect of the provider-targeted behavioral interventions (opioid justification and provider comparison), individually and in combination, on initial opioid prescription, initial use of non-opioid management, and patient-reported pain and function. Aim 2) Compare the effect of the 2 provider-targeted behavioral interventions, individually and in combination, on unsafe opioid prescribing and transition to chronic opioid therapy. Aim 3) Assess provider satisfaction and experience with the provider-targeted behavioral interventions. Hypotheses: Aim 1, H1a: Compared with the guideline (usual care) alone, the addition of the opioid justification and provider comparison behavioral interventions will be associated with a decreased proportion of opioid prescription and increased proportion of non-opioid management at the initial outpatient visit for acute non-cancer pain. Aim 1, H1b: Compared with usual care (guideline) alone, the addition of the opioid justification and provider comparison behavioral interventions will be associated with no difference in patient-reported pain, function, and satisfaction at 1, 6, and 12 months. Aim 2, H2: Compared with the usual care (guideline), the addition of opioid justification and provider comparison behavioral interventions will be associated with a decreased proportion of patients receiving unsafe opioid therapy and a decreased proportion of patients transitioning to chronic opioid therapy. Study Design: Pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial in 48 primary care clinics. Study Population: The patient population will be 19,855 opioid naïve adults who present to clinic with acute uncomplicated musculoskeletal pain or headache. Primary and Secondary Outcomes: The primary outcome measures will be receipt of an initial opioid prescription and unsafe opioid prescribing. Secondary outcomes will be non-opioid pain management, and, in 514 patients, patient-reported pain and function. Analytic Plan: The investigators will test for differences in the primary and secondary outcomes among the 4 intervention groups. Once completed, the project will provide evidence that health systems and other stakeholders need to implement interventions to prevent unsafe opioid prescribing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 23, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2021
CompletedOctober 8, 2024
June 1, 2023
1.4 years
April 29, 2018
October 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Initial Opioid Prescription
Initial opioid prescription (yes/no) (Primary) (Hypothesis 1a). Opioid prescription at qualifying clinic visit, measured via electronic health record (EHR).
1 day (assessed on day of initial qualifying clinic visit
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Initial non-opioid management
1 day (assessed on day of initial qualifying clinic visit)
Change in Patient Reported Pain and Function
Assessed at 1, 6, and 12 months after initial qualifying clinic visit
Unsafe opioid prescribing at 3 months
3 months after initial qualifying clinic visit
Unsafe opioid prescribing at 6 months
6 months after initial qualifying clinic visit
Unsafe opioid prescribing at 12 months
12 months after initial qualifying clinic visit
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Usual Care/Guideline
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Usual Care group (also known as the Guideline group) follows the recent Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines and, when triggered by an opioid prescription during a qualifying visit, will be delivered real-time in a short checklist of recommendations to: 1) check the state-specific Prescription Drug Monitoring Program; 2) assess risk factors for opioid-related harms (e.g., history of substance use disorder, history of mental health problems, benzodiazepine use); 3) avoid extended-release or long-acting opioids; 4) use a low dose of immediate-release opioid for short period of time (3-7 days); and 5) consider non-opioid management such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDS), and physical therapy. Epic EHR order sets will be linked to enable easing ordering of non-opioid therapy.
Guideline + Opioid Justification (OJ)
EXPERIMENTALProviders will be required asked to enter a free text justification for their decision to prescribe an opioid analgesic for the acute pain condition. The provider will be notified that the justification provided will be visible in the Epic EHR. The provider has the option of entering a justification or not. If no justification is entered, nothing will be entered into the record (i.e., the Opioid Justification area in the encounter record will be left blank). The provider does not need to enter a justification if they choose to cancel the opioid prescription.
Guideline + Provider Comparison (PC)
EXPERIMENTALProviders will receive monthly feedback via e-mail on their status in regards to initial opioid prescriptions for acute pain, adherence to safe opioid prescribing guidelines, and proportion of patients started on opioids f or acute pain who transition to chronic opioid therapy (\> 3 months). Providers in the lowest decile overall for proportion of patients with initial opioid prescriptions , unsafe opioid prescribing, and transition to chronic opioid therapy (\> 3 months) will be given positive feedback for providing high quality, evidence-based care to their patients with acute pain. Providers outside the lowest decile will be notified they are outside the high quality, evidence-based care range and will be provided with their proportions compared to the high performers.
Guideline + OJ + PC
EXPERIMENTALThis arm will include the guideline, opioid justification, and provider comparison described above.
Interventions
The Usual Care group (also known as the Guideline group) follows the recent CDC guidelines and, when triggered by an opioid prescription during a qualifying visit, will be delivered real-time in a short checklist of recommendations to: 1) check the state-specific Prescription Drug Monitoring Program; 2) assess risk factors for opioid-related harms (e.g., history of substance use disorder, history of mental health problems, benzodiazepine use); 3) avoid extended-release or long-acting opioids; 4) use a low dose of immediate-release opioid for short period of time (3-7 days); and 5) consider non-opioid management such as acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDS), and physical therapy. Epic EHR order sets will be linked to enable easing ordering of non-opioid therapy.
Providers will be required asked to enter a free text justification for their decision to prescribe an opioid analgesic for the acute pain condition. The provider will be notified that the justification provided will be visible in the Epic EHR. The provider has the option of entering a justification or not. If no justification is entered, nothing will be entered into the record (i.e., the Opioid Justification area in the encounter record will be left blank). The provider does not need to enter a justification if they choose to cancel the opioid prescription.
Providers will receive monthly feedback via e-mail on their status in regards to initial opioid prescriptions for acute pain, adherence to safe opioid prescribing guidelines, and proportion of patients started on opioids or acute pain who transition to chronic opioid therapy (\> 3 months). Providers in the lowest decile overall for proportion of patients with initial opioid prescriptions, unsafe opioid prescribing, and transition to chronic opioid therapy (\> 3 months) will be given positive feedback for providing high quality, evidence-based care to their patients with acute pain. Providers outside the lowest decile will be notified they are outside the high quality, evidence-based care range and will be provided with their proportions compared to the high performers.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 years or older; ii) index outpatient encounter with International Classification of Disease (ICD)-10 code for acute neck, back, or other musculoskeletal and headache diagnosis ("acute" defined as no similar diagnosis in past 3 months).
You may not qualify if:
- Cancer diagnosis (other than non-melanoma skin cancer)
- Receipt of opioid prescription within 12 months of index outpatient encounter
- Providers
- Primary care provider (MD, Doctor of Osteopathy (DO), Physician Assistant (PA), Nurse Practitioner (NP)) at participating practice
- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Pittsburghlead
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institutecollaborator
- Geisinger Cliniccollaborator
- University of Utahcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
UPMC Community Medicine Incorporated
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kraemer KL, Althouse AD, Salay M, Gordon AJ, Wright E, Anisman D, Cochran G, Fischer G, Gellad WF, Hamm M, Kern M, Wasan AD. Effect of Different Interventions to Help Primary Care Clinicians Avoid Unsafe Opioid Prescribing in Opioid-Naive Patients With Acute Noncancer Pain: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jul 29;3(7):e222263. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.2263. eCollection 2022 Jul.
PMID: 35983579DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kevin L Kraemer, MD
University of Pittsburgh
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2018
First Posted
May 25, 2018
Study Start
September 23, 2018
Primary Completion
January 31, 2020
Study Completion
February 28, 2021
Last Updated
October 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share