NCT03537040

Brief Summary

The aim of the current study is to pilot a novel intervention to help people explore their decision making around the use of neuroleptic medication. A case series design will be used, with outcome variables measured at multiple time points pre-, during- and post-intervention. Participants will also be asked to complete an evaluation interview post-intervention. The primary aim is to investigate the feasibility and acceptability of offering the intervention.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 18, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 25, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 27, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 23, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 10, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

May 21, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

April 18, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 18, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Number of participants recruited to the study

    Number of participants recruited to the study

    through study completion, an average of 5 months.

  • Number of participants retained during the study

    Number of participants retained during the study

    through study completion, an average of 5 months.

  • Change in therapeutic alliance from baseline to 12 weeks

    The Session Rating Scale is a brief therapeutic alliance measure designed for every session clinical use. The SRS is a four-item visual analogue instrument that explores the relationship, goals and topics, approach or method, and how the client perceives the session in total. Scores range between 0 and 40, higher scores suggest better therapeutic alliance.

    baseline, 12 weeks.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Change in treatment-related empowerment from baseline to 12 weeks

    baseline, 12 weeks.

  • Change in attitude towards medication from baseline to 12 weeks

    baseline, 12 weeks.

  • Change in compliance to medication regime from baseline to 12 weeks

    baseline, 12 weeks.

  • Change in personal recovery from baseline to 12 weeks

    baseline, 12 weeks.

  • Change in engagement with services from baseline to 12 weeks

    baseline, 12 weeks.

Study Arms (1)

Method of Levels

OTHER

Talking therapy- duration and frequency of sessions to be determined by participant

Other: Method of Levels

Interventions

Talking Therapy

Method of Levels

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Over 16 years of age
  • Capacity to provide informed written consent
  • Able to converse in English proficiently
  • Currently under the care of an Early Intervention Service or Community Mental Health Team
  • Ambivalent around medication use
  • Experience of psychosis
  • Be able to be assessed in an outpatient facility (exceptions will be made for disabilities)

You may not qualify if:

  • If currently experiencing such a deterioration in mental state that they may have difficulties making decisions in their life
  • If significant risk of harm to self or others is present
  • If there is an organic basis for psychosis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust

Preston, Lancashire, BB10 4el, United Kingdom

Location

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust

Manchester, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Moncrieff J. Does antipsychotic withdrawal provoke psychosis? Review of the literature on rapid onset psychosis (supersensitivity psychosis) and withdrawal-related relapse. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2006 Jul;114(1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00787.x.

    PMID: 16774655BACKGROUND
  • Mansell W, Carey TA. A century of psychology and psychotherapy: is an understanding of 'control' the missing link between theory, research, and practice? Psychol Psychother. 2009 Sep;82(Pt 3):337-53. doi: 10.1348/147608309X432526. Epub 2009 Apr 1.

    PMID: 19341533BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychotic DisordersMedication Adherence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic DisordersMental DisordersPatient CompliancePatient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Sara Tai

    University of Manchester

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Trainee Clinical Psychologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2018

First Posted

May 25, 2018

Study Start

June 27, 2018

Primary Completion

March 23, 2019

Study Completion

May 10, 2019

Last Updated

May 21, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Annoymous data files for outcome data will be shared on request

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF, CSR
Time Frame
Data will be available within 6 months of study completion
Access Criteria
Data access requests will be reviewed by research team. Requestors will be required to sign a data access agreement

Locations