Accuracy of Computer Guided Versus Conventional Ridge Splitting of Horizontal Deficient in Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Ridge

NCT03533309 | Unknown DMC

• 1 other identifier: 152018
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 14
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

In patient with horizontal deficiency in alveolar ridge of the anterior maxilla, Dose computer Guided stent enhance the accuracy and clinical outcome vs conventional ridge splitting surgery????

Conditions

Ridge Deficency

Keywords

horizontal defect, Anterior maxillary

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Accuracy

  In computer Guided: CBCT will performed pre-operative and post-operative for measure the difference of degree in superimposition after ridge splitting. In conventional method: Ridge mapping will applied in preoperative clinical evaluation, and measure in post-operative, the difference in splitting will calculate in millimeter (mm) In computer Guided: CBCT will performed pre-operative and post-operative for measure the difference of degree in superimposition after ridge splitting. In conventional method: Ridge mapping will applied in preoperative clinical evaluation, and measure in post-operative, the difference in splitting will calculate in millimeter (mm)

  up to 4 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Thickness of buccal cortical plate

  up to 4 months

Study Arms (2)

computer guided

EXPERIMENTAL

Group (A): comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using computer guided surgical cutting stent. .

Procedure: Computer guided surgical cutting guide

conventional

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Group (B) comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using conventional technique

Procedure: Conventional alveolar ridge splitting

Interventions

Computer guided surgical cutting guide PROCEDURE

comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using computer guided surgical cutting stent

computer guided

Conventional alveolar ridge splitting PROCEDURE

comprised 6 patient undergoing surgical alveolar ridge splitting using conventional technique.

conventional

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 16 Years - 55 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

• Partial edentulous in the aesthetic zone.
• Patient with bucco-lingual bone width is 3 mm or greater but \< 6mm
• Normal alveolar bone height
• Adequate oral hygiene
• Free of soft tissue or dental pathology
• Patients accepting to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

• Patient medically compromised.
• Uncooperative patient.
• Poor oral hygiene and periodontal disease.
• Patients who smoked and pregnant women
• Systemic disease directly affecting bone healing
• Atrophic ridges (1.5 mm or less)
• History of radiotherapy \& treatment with bisphosphonates.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Cairo University: lead

Central Study Contacts

abdelrahman akram aburass, master

CONTACT

00201288769226; abdalrahman.aburas@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

niveen asker

CONTACT

00201001558769; niveen.asker@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: DOUBLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: SINGLE GROUP
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Doctor

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: May 11, 2018
• First Posted: May 23, 2018
• Study Start: July 1, 2018
• Primary Completion: July 30, 2019
• Study Completion: October 30, 2019
• Last Updated: May 24, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-05