Effects of a 0.03% CHX Mouth Rinse in Peri-implant Mucositis
Clinical and Microbiological Effects of a 0.03% Chlorhexidine Mouth Rinse in the Prevention of Peri-implant Diseases: a Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of a 0.03% chlorhexidine (CHX) and 0.05% cetyl pyridinium chloride (CPC) mouth rinse, as an adjunct to professionally and patient-administered mechanical plaque removal, in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis. Material and Methods: Patients displaying peri-implant mucositis in, at least, one implant were included in this randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial. Subjects received a conventional professional prophylaxis (at baseline and 6-month visits) and were instructed to regular oral hygiene practices and to rinse, twice daily, during one year, with a 0.03% CHX and 0.05% CPC mouth rinse, or a placebo. Clinical, radiographic and microbiological data were recorded at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Disease resolution was defined as the absence of bleeding on probing (BOP). Repeated measures ANOVA, Student-t and chi square tests were used.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2015
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 4, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 25, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 7, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 23, 2018
CompletedMay 23, 2018
April 1, 2018
1.4 years
April 18, 2018
May 22, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change on bleeding on probing on implants
Bleeding on probing (BOP) on implants, evaluated dichotomously (presence/absence), considering a positive score when evident bleeding was observed within 15 s after gentle probing (Jepsen et al. 2015) at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Primary outcome would be considered for the change between baseline and 12 months One blinded and calibrated investigator recorded BOP at 6 sites around implants, using a plastic periodontal probe (PCV12, HuFriedy, Chicago, IL, USA) Calibration was achieved in double measurement calibration sessions, with a gold standard, on six randomly selected patients within one week. The inter-examiner agreement resulting in kappa (k) values of 0.78 for BOP).
Change baseline-12 months
Secondary Outcomes (44)
Bleeding on probing (BOP) on implants
Baseline
Bleeding on probing (BOP) on implants
3 months
Bleeding on probing (BOP) on implants
6 months
Bleeding on probing (BOP) on implants
9 months
Bleeding on probing (BOP) on implants
12 months
- +39 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Chlorhexidine
EXPERIMENTALMechanical treatment + 0.03% chlorhexidine + 0.05% CPC mouthrinse
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORMechanical treatment + Placebo mouth rinse
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- the presence of, at least, one dental implant with clinical signs of peri-implant mucositis, defined as gently bleeding on probing (BOP) and/or suppuration without progressive radiographic bone loss (after at least 1 year of functional loading)
You may not qualify if:
- untreated or recurrent periodontitis \[presence of nine or more sites with PD 5 mm and with full mouth bleeding score (FMBS) \> 25%\];
- implants affected by peri-implantitis, (BOP and/or suppuration and progressive radiographic bone loss);
- removable implant-retained prosthesis;
- history of intake of systemic antibiotics within the previous month or other chronic systemic medications that could interfere with the study outcomes;
- and women being pregnant or breast-feeding.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Universidad Complutense de Madridlead
- Dentaid SLcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Univesity Complutense, Madrid
Madrid, 28040, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Bollain J, Pulcini A, Sanz-Sanchez I, Figuero E, Alonso B, Sanz M, Herrera D. Efficacy of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in reducing inflammation around the teeth and implants: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr;25(4):1729-1741. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03474-3. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
PMID: 32737664DERIVEDPulcini A, Bollain J, Sanz-Sanchez I, Figuero E, Alonso B, Sanz M, Herrera D. Clinical effects of the adjunctive use of a 0.03% chlorhexidine and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouth rinse in the management of peri-implant diseases: A randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Mar;46(3):342-353. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13088.
PMID: 30779246DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mariano Sanz, Doctor
University Complutense Madrid (UCM)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David Herrera, Doctor
University Complutense Madrid
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2018
First Posted
May 23, 2018
Study Start
November 4, 2015
Primary Completion
March 25, 2017
Study Completion
April 7, 2017
Last Updated
May 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share