Testing of a Tool to Elicit Patient Preferences for CTS
2 other identifiers
interventional
49
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will complete a randomized controlled trial to quantitatively measure patient decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale) in 150 patients treated for CTS with the tool compared to 150 patients treated with standard care. The investigators hypothesize patients treated for CTS will have lower decisional conflict with the tool.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 3, 2024
CompletedJuly 3, 2024
June 1, 2024
2.3 years
May 9, 2018
June 10, 2024
June 10, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Decisional Conflict Scale
The Decisional Conflict Scale measures uncertainty in choosing options; modifiable factors contributing to uncertainty such as feeling uninformed, unclear about personal values and unsupported in decision making; and effective decision making such as feeling the choice is informed, values-based, likely to be implemented and expressing satisfaction with the choice. The survey consists of 16 statements with 5 response categories. Scoring: total scale-0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extreme decisional conflict). Lower values indicate lower decisional conflict- i.e. a better outcome for use of the tool. Calculation: Summed, divided by # of items, multiplied by 25
Immediately after using tool (up to 5 minutes to complete survey)
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONNone- normal care
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALPatients will use a preference elicitation tool to determine their preferences for diagnosis and treatment of CTS
Interventions
A preference elicitation tool for carpal tunnel syndrome
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- New patient
- English fluency and literacy
- Able to take informed consent
- clinical diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome
You may not qualify if:
- Prior diagnostic testing for carpal tunnel (nerve test, ultrasound)
- Prior carpal tunnel release
- Diagnosis of C5/6 radiculopathy (double crush)
- Peripheral neuropathy (ex: diabetic)
- Worker Compensation/EMG Required
- Symptoms of Cubital tunnel syndrome
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Stanford Universitylead
- Duke Universitycollaborator
- Brown Universitycollaborator
- University of Texas at Austincollaborator
- Mayo Cliniccollaborator
- Harvard Universitycollaborator
- National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Stanford Health Care
Redwood City, California, 94061, United States
Related Publications (25)
Zhang S, Vora M, Harris AH, Baker L, Curtin C, Kamal RN. Cost-Minimization Analysis of Open and Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Dec 7;98(23):1970-1977. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00121.
PMID: 27926678BACKGROUNDAtroshi I, Englund M, Turkiewicz A, Tagil M, Petersson IF. Incidence of physician-diagnosed carpal tunnel syndrome in the general population. Arch Intern Med. 2011 May 23;171(10):943-4. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.203. No abstract available.
PMID: 21606100BACKGROUNDFajardo M, Kim SH, Szabo RM. Incidence of carpal tunnel release: trends and implications within the United States ambulatory care setting. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Aug;37(8):1599-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.04.035. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
PMID: 22727925BACKGROUNDHageman MG, Kinaci A, Ju K, Guitton TG, Mudgal CS, Ring D; Science of Variation Group. Carpal tunnel syndrome: assessment of surgeon and patient preferences and priorities for decision-making. J Hand Surg Am. 2014 Sep;39(9):1799-1804.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.035. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
PMID: 25087865BACKGROUNDOshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 3;368(1):6-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1209500. No abstract available.
PMID: 23281971BACKGROUNDElwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, Joseph-Williams N, Lloyd A, Kinnersley P, Cording E, Tomson D, Dodd C, Rollnick S, Edwards A, Barry M. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1361-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2077-6. Epub 2012 May 23.
PMID: 22618581BACKGROUNDAlfandre D. Clinical Recommendations in Medical Practice: A Proposed Framework to Reduce Bias and Improve the Quality of Medical Decisions. J Clin Ethics. 2016 Spring;27(1):21-7.
PMID: 27045301BACKGROUNDMulley AG, Trimble C, Elwyn G. Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients' preferences matter. BMJ. 2012 Nov 8;345:e6572. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6572. No abstract available.
PMID: 23137819BACKGROUNDLang F, Floyd MR, Beine KL. Clues to patients' explanations and concerns about their illnesses. A call for active listening. Arch Fam Med. 2000 Mar;9(3):222-7. doi: 10.1001/archfami.9.3.222.
PMID: 10728107BACKGROUNDJohnson DC, Mueller DE, Deal AM, Dunn MW, Smith AB, Woods ME, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS, Nielsen ME. Integrating Patient Preference into Treatment Decisions for Men with Prostate Cancer at the Point of Care. J Urol. 2016 Dec;196(6):1640-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.082. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
PMID: 27346032BACKGROUNDFraenkel L, Chodkowski D, Lim J, Garcia-Tsao G. Patients' preferences for treatment of hepatitis C. Med Decis Making. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):45-57. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09341588. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
PMID: 19636065BACKGROUNDHageman MG, Bossen JK, Neuhaus V, Mudgal CS, Ring D; Science of Variation Group. Assessment of Decisional Conflict about the Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, Comparing Patients and Physicians. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2016 Apr;4(2):150-5.
PMID: 27200394BACKGROUNDKamal RN; Hand Surgery Quality Consortium. Quality and Value in an Evolving Health Care Landscape. J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Jul;41(7):794-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.05.016.
PMID: 27374791BACKGROUNDKeith MW, Masear V, Amadio PC, Andary M, Barth RW, Graham B, Chung K, Maupin K, Watters WC 3rd, Haralson RH 3rd, Turkelson CM, Wies JL, McGowan R. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009 Jun;17(6):397-405. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200906000-00008.
PMID: 19474449BACKGROUNDNewington L, Harris EC, Walker-Bone K. Carpal tunnel syndrome and work. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;29(3):440-53. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 May 27.
PMID: 26612240BACKGROUNDGraham B. The value added by electrodiagnostic testing in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Dec;90(12):2587-93. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01362.
PMID: 19047703BACKGROUNDGraham B. The diagnosis and treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. BMJ. 2006 Jun 24;332(7556):1463-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7556.1463. No abstract available.
PMID: 16793786BACKGROUNDGraham B, Regehr G, Naglie G, Wright JG. Development and validation of diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Jul-Aug;31(6):919-24.
PMID: 16886290BACKGROUNDFowler JR, Cipolli W, Hanson T. A Comparison of Three Diagnostic Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Using Latent Class Analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 Dec 2;97(23):1958-61. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.O.00476.
PMID: 26631997BACKGROUNDPulikkottil BJ, Schub M, Kadow TR, Wang W, Fowler JR. Correlating Median Nerve Cross-sectional Area With Nerve Conduction Studies. J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Oct;41(10):958-962. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.08.018.
PMID: 27702467BACKGROUNDFlynn KE, Weinfurt KP, Seils DM, Lin L, Burnett CB, Schulman KA, Meropol NJ. Decisional conflict among patients who accept or decline participation in phase I oncology studies. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2008 Sep;3(3):69-77. doi: 10.1525/jer.2008.3.3.69.
PMID: 19122780BACKGROUNDHyman DJ, Pavlik VN, Greisinger AJ, Chan W, Bayona J, Mansyur C, Simms V, Pool J. Effect of a physician uncertainty reduction intervention on blood pressure in uncontrolled hypertensives--a cluster randomized trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Apr;27(4):413-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1888-1. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
PMID: 22033742BACKGROUNDWittink MN, Cary M, Tenhave T, Baron J, Gallo JJ. TOWARDS PATIENT-CENTERED CARE FOR DEPRESSION: CONJOINT METHODS TO TAILOR TREATMENT BASED ON PREFERENCES. Patient. 2010;3(3):145-157. doi: 10.2165/11530660.
PMID: 20671803BACKGROUNDBaker LC, Bundorf MK, Kessler DP. Patients' preferences explain a small but significant share of regional variation in medicare spending. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jun;33(6):957-63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1184.
PMID: 24889944BACKGROUNDHampson LA, Allen IE, Gaither TW, Lin T, Ting J, Osterberg EC, Wilson L, Breyer BN. Patient-centered Treatment Decisions for Urethral Stricture: Conjoint Analysis Improves Surgical Decision-making. Urology. 2017 Jan;99:246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.053. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
PMID: 27645527BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Robin Kamal
- Organization
- Stanford University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Robin N Kamal, MD
Stanford University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- No masking will occur
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2018
First Posted
May 22, 2018
Study Start
March 1, 2021
Primary Completion
June 1, 2023
Study Completion
June 1, 2023
Last Updated
July 3, 2024
Results First Posted
July 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD will not be shared with other researchers