NCT03532100

Brief Summary

When prescribing a prosthetic foot, clinicians face a dizzying array of choices as more than 200 different prosthetic feet are available. While these conventional prosthetic feet primarily function in the sagittal plane, the intact foot and ankle comprise a complex set of joints that allow rotation in multiple planes of motion. Some of these motions are coupled, meaning rotation in one plane induces motion in another. One such coupling is between the sagittal and transverse planes. For every step, plantar- and dorsi-flexion motion in the sagittal plane is coupled with external and internal rotation of the shank relative to the foot in the transverse plane. There is no prosthetic foot available for prescription that mimics this natural coupling. To investigate the need for this coupling, the investigators have built a torsionally adaptive prosthesis where the coupling ratio between the transverse- and sagittal-planes can be independently controlled with a motor. This research has one specific aim: to identify the optimal coupling ratio between transverse- and sagittal-plane motions using a novel, torsionally adaptive prosthesis for individuals with lower limb amputation. The investigators will conduct a human subject experiment wearing the motor-driven and computer controlled torsionally adaptive prosthesis. Individuals with lower limb amputation will be asked to walk in a straight line and in both directions around a circle while the coupling ratio between transverse- and sagittal-plane motions is varied between trials. Participants will be blinded to the coupling ratio. The investigators hypothesize that: (1) a coupling ratio exists that minimizes undesirable transverse-plane socket torque and (2) there will be a coupling ratio that individuals with lower limb amputation prefer.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
14

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 18, 2018

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 9, 2018

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 22, 2018

Completed
6.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 18, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

November 19, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 19, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6.5 years

First QC Date

May 9, 2018

Results QC Date

September 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 5, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

lower limb prosthesistranstibial amputationbelow knee amputationbiomechanicsgait

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Peak Transverse-plane Prosthetic Socket Torque Normalized to Body Mass

    Peak transverse-plane prosthetic socket torque measured while walking normalized to body mass

    During walking trials for each coupling ratio

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Satisfaction With the Prosthesis

    Immediately following walking trials for each coupling ratio

Study Arms (3)

Straight line walking

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants will walk in a straight line while wearing the study prosthesis.

Device: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 0:1 coupling ratioDevice: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:6 coupling ratioDevice: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:4 coupling ratioDevice: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:3 coupling ratioDevice: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:2 coupling ratio

Circle walking with prosthesis inside

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants will walk around a 1-meter radius circle with their prosthesis on the inside of the circle.

Device: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 0:1 coupling ratioDevice: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:6 coupling ratioDevice: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:4 coupling ratioDevice: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:3 coupling ratioDevice: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:2 coupling ratio

Circle walking with prosthesis outside

EXPERIMENTAL

All participants will walk around a 1-meter radius circle with their prosthesis on the outside of the circle.

Device: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 0:1 coupling ratioDevice: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:6 coupling ratioDevice: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:4 coupling ratioDevice: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:3 coupling ratioDevice: Torsionally adaptive prosthesis with 1:2 coupling ratio

Interventions

The torsionally adaptive prosthesis can be programmed to couple the motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 0:1 means there will be no coupling between the transverse- and sagittal-plane motion. That is, regardless of any motion in the sagittal plane, there will be zero motion in the transverse plane.

Circle walking with prosthesis insideCircle walking with prosthesis outsideStraight line walking

The torsionally adaptive prosthesis can be programmed to couple the motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:6 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every six degrees of motion in the sagittal plane.

Circle walking with prosthesis insideCircle walking with prosthesis outsideStraight line walking

The torsionally adaptive prosthesis can be programmed to couple the motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:4 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every four degrees of motion in the sagittal plane.

Circle walking with prosthesis insideCircle walking with prosthesis outsideStraight line walking

The torsionally adaptive prosthesis can be programmed to couple the motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:3 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every three degrees of motion in the sagittal plane.

Circle walking with prosthesis insideCircle walking with prosthesis outsideStraight line walking

The torsionally adaptive prosthesis can be programmed to couple the motion between the transverse- and sagittal-planes. A coupling ratio (transverse:sagittal) of 1:2 means there will be one degree of motion in the transverse plane for every two degrees of motion in the sagittal plane.

Circle walking with prosthesis insideCircle walking with prosthesis outsideStraight line walking

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Unilateral transtibial amputation
  • Been fit with a prosthesis and used it for at least six months
  • Wear the prosthesis for four or more hours on an average day
  • Prescribed prosthesis can accommodate fitment of the study prosthetic components to be tested (determined at initial visit)

You may not qualify if:

  • Improper fit and suspension with current prosthesis and one cannot be achieved with clinical resources (determined at initial visit)
  • Current skin irritation or injury on residual limb
  • Osteoarthritis, injury, or pain that interferes with walking ability
  • Currently incarcerated
  • Pregnant (determined via self-report)
  • Inadequate cognitive function or language proficiency to consent to participate

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

Seattle, Washington, 98108-1532, United States

Location

Results Point of Contact

Title
Glenn Klute, PhD
Organization
CLiMB

Study Officials

  • Glenn K Klute, PhD

    VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: This within-subject, cross-over, factorial design study (3 arms x 5 intervention settings) aims to identify the optimal coupling ratio between transverse- and sagittal-plane motions using a torsionally adaptive prosthesis. The 3 arms including walking in a straight line (study visit 1) and walking in a circle with their lower limb prosthesis on the inside and outside of the circle (study visit 2). The order in which the participants walk around a circle with their prosthesis on the inside or the outside will be randomized. The study intervention, a torsionally adaptive prosthesis, can be set to 5 different settings (i.e., coupling ratios) including 0:0, 1:6, 1:4, 1:3, and 1:2 (transverse:sagittal). Within each arm, each participant will walk with the torsionally adaptive prosthesis set to the 5 different settings in random order. Participants will not be blinded to the arm but will be blinded to the intervention setting (coupling ratio).
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2018

First Posted

May 22, 2018

Study Start

April 18, 2018

Primary Completion

October 1, 2024

Study Completion

November 18, 2024

Last Updated

November 19, 2025

Results First Posted

November 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

A de-identified, anonymized dataset in machine-readable format will be created and shared for all individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in a publication. The investigators will follow 164.514(a) of the HIPAA Privacy Rule for de-identification of IPD.

Time Frame
Within six months after publication of final study findings.
Access Criteria
Open access through PubMed Central, SimTK, PhysioNet, or other similar open-source data repository websites. The investigators will work with manuscript publishers when possible to link the final study data sets to an appendix of supplemental materials on the publisher websites.

Locations