Bempedoic Acid + Ezetimibe Fixed-Dose Combination (FDC) Study in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Elevated LDL-C
A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid 180 + Ezetimibe 10 Fixed-Dose Combination Compared to Ezetimibe and Placebo In Subjects With T2DM and Elevated LDL-Cholesterol
1 other identifier
interventional
242
1 country
4
Brief Summary
12 week study to assess the LDL-C lowering efficacy, other lipid and glycemic measures, and safety of bempedoic acid/ezetimibe FDC compared to ezetimibe and placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and elevated LDL-C
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 diabetes
Started May 2018
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 9, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 22, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 18, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 9, 2020
CompletedApril 9, 2020
April 1, 2020
1.1 years
May 9, 2018
March 25, 2020
April 8, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12/End of Study (EOS) in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for LDL-C. Baseline was defined as the average of LDL-C values at the Screening Visit 3 (Visit S3) and the Treatment Visit 1 (Visit T1) (last 2 non-missing values on or prior to Day 1). If only 1 value was available, the single value was used as Baseline. Percent change from Baseline for LDL-C was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with treatment as factor and Baseline lipid parameter as a covariate. Missing data for LDL-C was imputed using the last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Percent change from Baseline was calculated as: (\[LDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline value\]) multiplied by 100. For LDL-C, if a measured LDL-C value was available, measured LDL-C was used.
Baseline; Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12/EOS in LDL-C (Comparing Ezetimibe With Placebo)
Baseline; Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
Baseline; Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
Baseline; Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol (TC)
Baseline; Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
Baseline; Week 12
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (4)
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Fasting Plasma Glucose
Baseline; Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 2-hour Post Prandial Plasma Glucose (PPG)
Baseline; Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) Index
Baseline; Week 12
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Bempedoic acid + Ezetimibe FDC
EXPERIMENTALBempedoic acid + Ezetimibe FDC Oral Tablet; Placebo oral capsule
Ezetimibe 10 mg
ACTIVE COMPARATOREzetimibe 10Mg Oral Tablet; Placebo Oral Tablet
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo Oral Tablet, Placebo oral capsule
Interventions
Experimental therapy of bempedoic acid 180 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg FDC tablet
Ezetimibe 10 mg tablet, overencapsulated for blinding purposes
Placebo tablet, matched for the FDC product for blinding purposes
Placebo over-encapsulated for blinding purposes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Type 2 diabetes for 6 months or greater
- Currently taking stable diabetes medication for 3 months or greater
- HbA1c between 7-10%
- LDL-cholesterol greater than 70 mg/dL
- Women must not be pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant within 30 days after last dose of study medication; and must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or willing to use 1 acceptable form of birth control during the study through 30 days after the last dose of study medication
You may not qualify if:
- Body mass index \> 40 kg/m2
- History of documented clinically significant cardiovascular disease
- Fasting triglycerides \> 400 mg/dL
- History of Type 1 diabetes
- Uncontrolled hypothyroidism, liver dysfunction, renal dysfunction, gastrointestinal condition that may affect drug absorption, hematologic or coagulation disorder or active malignancy
- History of drug or alcohol abuse within 2 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Clinical Trials Research
Lincoln, California, 95648, United States
FInlay Medical Research
Miami, Florida, 33126, United States
L-MARC Research Center
Louisville, Kentucky, 40213, United States
Hampton Roads Center for Clinical Research
Suffolk, Virginia, 23435, United States
Related Publications (1)
Gutierrez MJ, Rosenberg NL, Macdougall DE, Hanselman JC, Margulies JR, Strange P, Milad MA, McBride SJ, Newton RS. Efficacy and safety of ETC-1002, a novel investigational low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol-lowering therapy for the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014 Mar;34(3):676-83. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302677. Epub 2014 Jan 2.
PMID: 24385236BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Sites 5801003, 5801041, and 5801043 were suspected of Good Clinical Practice violations in an earlier Phase 3 trial (NCT03337308), hence the Efficacy Analysis Set (which excluded these 3 sites) was designated as the primary efficacy analysis set.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Medical Director
- Organization
- Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ron Haberman, MD
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 9, 2018
First Posted
May 22, 2018
Study Start
May 9, 2018
Primary Completion
June 18, 2019
Study Completion
June 18, 2019
Last Updated
April 9, 2020
Results First Posted
April 9, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share