NCT03531502

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to determine the optimal treatment for patients who receive a single shock from their implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). All participants in this study will be fitted with a special electrode vest to detect the origin of heart rhythm abnormalities and then they will undergo a procedure called Non-Invasive Programmed Stimulation (NIPS). This procedure involves sedating a participants with anesthesia and then using the participant's own ICD to try to stimulate the heart to go into ventricular tachycardia. If this procedure is unable to induce the participant into ventricular tachycardia, then the participant will just be managed with usual care and will not be placed on any additional medications and will not undergo an ablation. However, if the NIPS induces the ventricular tachycardia, the electrode vest will be used to determine the origin of the abnormal heart rhythm inside the heart. After a successful NIPS procedure, the participants will be randomly assigned to either be placed on medication therapy or undergo catheter ablation. The outcomes from all three groups will be compared and the researchers hope to better understand which participants are most likely to benefit from watchful waiting versus medication versus catheter ablation.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 9, 2018

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 25, 2018

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 21, 2018

Completed
4.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 4, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 4, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

April 13, 2023

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

5 years

First QC Date

April 25, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 11, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

tachycardiadefibrillatorarrythmia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • ICD Shocks

    Number of recurrent ICD shocks

    12 months

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Total Mortality

    12 months

  • Hospitalizations

    12 months

  • ATP Therapy as recorded by ICD

    12 months

  • Non-sustained VT

    12 months

  • Initiation of antiarrythmic medication

    12 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Standard medical therapy

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients who have a positive NIPS study and are randomized to the medical therapy arm will either be initiated on antiarrhythmic therapy or will have their antiarrhythmic therapy intensified. All medication therapy is considered usual standard therapy.

Other: Standard Medical TherapyProcedure: Non-Invasive Programmed Stimulation (NIPS)

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients who have a positive NIPS study and are randomized to the ablation arm will undergo ventricular tachycardia ablation procedure guided by CardioInsight.

Procedure: Ventricular Tachycardia AblationProcedure: Non-Invasive Programmed Stimulation (NIPS)

Negative NIPS/Non-intervention

OTHER

Patients who had a negative NIPS study will not be assigned to a treatment group and will be followed according to standard of care.

Procedure: Non-Invasive Programmed Stimulation (NIPS)

Interventions

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

For the antiarrhythmic naïve patients, the attending physician may initiate therapy with sotalol or amiodarone. For patients already on therapy with sotalol or amiodarone, the attending physician may choose to either increase the dosage/ frequency of these medications and/or add mexiletine to the regimen. Other alterations to medical therapy, such as adjusting the dose of beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, anti-hypertensive, diuretic or anti-anginal medications may be performed at the discretion of the attending physician.

Standard medical therapy

All patients will receive this procedure in attempt to induce ventricular tachycardia. The outcome of this procedure determines if a patient will be randomized.

Negative NIPS/Non-interventionStandard medical therapyVentricular Tachycardia Ablation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years old, both males and females
  • Single or dual chamber ICD or BiVentricular ICD in situ
  • Ischemic or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy
  • Receive a single shock from their ICD for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia

You may not qualify if:

  • ICD shock for polymorphic VT/VF or inappropriate shock
  • Previous ventricular tachycardia ablation within 1 year
  • NYHA Class IV heart failure or current inotrope therapy
  • Ventricular tachycardia storm
  • Listed for heart transplant or LVAD
  • Pregnant as determined by urine pregnancy test prior to NIPS

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City

Kansas City, Missouri, 64111, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Reddy VY, Reynolds MR, Neuzil P, Richardson AW, Taborsky M, Jongnarangsin K, Kralovec S, Sediva L, Ruskin JN, Josephson ME. Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy. N Engl J Med. 2007 Dec 27;357(26):2657-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa065457.

  • Sapp JL, Wells GA, Parkash R, Stevenson WG, Blier L, Sarrazin JF, Thibault B, Rivard L, Gula L, Leong-Sit P, Essebag V, Nery PB, Tung SK, Raymond JM, Sterns LD, Veenhuyzen GD, Healey JS, Redfearn D, Roux JF, Tang AS. Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation versus Escalation of Antiarrhythmic Drugs. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):111-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513614. Epub 2016 May 5.

  • Frankel DS, Mountantonakis SE, Zado ES, Anter E, Bala R, Cooper JM, Deo R, Dixit S, Epstein AE, Garcia FC, Gerstenfeld EP, Hutchinson MD, Lin D, Patel VV, Riley MP, Robinson MR, Tzou WS, Verdino RJ, Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE. Noninvasive programmed ventricular stimulation early after ventricular tachycardia ablation to predict risk of late recurrence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 24;59(17):1529-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.026.

  • Kheiri B, Barbarawi M, Zayed Y, Hicks M, Osman M, Rashdan L, Kyi HH, Bachuwa G, Hassan M, Stecker EC, Nazer B, Bhatt DL. Antiarrhythmic Drugs or Catheter Ablation in the Management of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Nov;12(11):e007600. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007600. Epub 2019 Nov 8.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Tachycardia, VentricularTachycardiaArrhythmias, Cardiac

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesCardiac Conduction System DiseasePathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Sanjaya Gupta, MD

    Saint Luke's Health System

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: prospective, randomized, controlled
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2018

First Posted

May 21, 2018

Study Start

April 9, 2018

Primary Completion

April 4, 2023

Study Completion

April 4, 2023

Last Updated

April 13, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations