The Comparison of Granulosa Cell Apoptosis Rates With or Without Luteinizing Hormone Administration in Poor Responders.
2 other identifiers
observational
31
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In Zeynep Kamil Women and Children's Education and Research Hospital which is a tertiary referral hospital, the investigators perform microdose flare-up gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GNRH) analogue or GNRH antagonist protocol to the poor responders. The investigators may or may not supplement luteinizing hormone (LH). Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) triggering is performed when at least 2 follicles diameter are above 17 mm and the serum estradiol level is above 500 pg / ml. 36 hours after hCG, ovarian aspiration is performed by the guidance of transvaginal ultrasound. Normally after oocyte separation process, the remaining follicle aspiration fluid is destroyed. n the present study, the follicle aspiration fluid is planned to be used with the patient's permission. The investigators are going to examine the granulosa cell apoptosis rate by using annexin-5 antibody in both groups 1 (LH added) and 2 (without LH). For this purpose, a total of 40 volunteer patients are planned to involve, the groups are designed as 20 LH added and 20 LH added women. In the present study, the investigators hypothesis that the rates of granulosa cell apoptosis in poor responders may be different between the group 1 (with LH) and group 2 (without LH), this will lead to IVF therapy in the near future.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Oct 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 17, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2019
CompletedJune 22, 2020
June 1, 2020
2 months
April 25, 2018
June 18, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the comparison of granulosa cell apoptosis rate with or without LH supplementation in poor responders
the investigators hypothesized that granulosa cell apoptosis rate on luteinizing hormone supplemented microdose flare up GnRH analog protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization would be lower than not administered protocol
June 2018-August 2018
Study Arms (2)
LH supplementation
luteinizing hormone administrated microdose flare up GnRH analog protocol in poor ovarian responders undergoing in vitro fertilization.
without LH supplementation
microdose flare up GnRH analog protocol in poor ovarian responders
Eligibility Criteria
18-49 aged females who undergoes IVF treatment and who are defined as poor responders
You may qualify if:
- aged female
- poor ovarian responders
- undergoing treatment for primary/secondary infertility
You may not qualify if:
- endocrinologic or metabolic disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sebnem Alanya Tosun
Giresun, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (9)
Bosch E, Labarta E, Crespo J, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Impact of luteinizing hormone administration on gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: an age-adjusted analysis. Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 1;95(3):1031-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.021. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
PMID: 21067717BACKGROUNDFerraretti AP, Gianaroli L, Magli MC, D'angelo A, Farfalli V, Montanaro N. Exogenous luteinizing hormone in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction techniques. Fertil Steril. 2004 Dec;82(6):1521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.06.041.
PMID: 15589853BACKGROUNDKaleli S, Yanikkaya-Demirel G, Erel CT, Senturk LM, Topcuoglu A, Irez T. High rate of aneuploidy in luteinized granulosa cells obtained from follicular fluid in women who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril. 2005 Sep;84(3):802-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.02.040.
PMID: 16169431BACKGROUNDSullivan MW, Stewart-Akers A, Krasnow JS, Berga SL, Zeleznik AJ. Ovarian responses in women to recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone (LH): a role for LH in the final stages of follicular maturation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Jan;84(1):228-32. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.1.5389.
PMID: 9920089BACKGROUNDFilicori M, Cognigni GE, Samara A, Melappioni S, Perri T, Cantelli B, Parmegiani L, Pelusi G, DeAloysio D. The use of LH activity to drive folliculogenesis: exploring uncharted territories in ovulation induction. Hum Reprod Update. 2002 Nov-Dec;8(6):543-57. doi: 10.1093/humupd/8.6.543.
PMID: 12498424BACKGROUNDBalasch J, Vidal E, Penarrubia J, Casamitjana R, Carmona F, Creus M, Fabregues F, Vanrell JA. Suppression of LH during ovarian stimulation: analysing threshold values and effects on ovarian response and the outcome of assisted reproduction in down-regulated women stimulated with recombinant FSH. Hum Reprod. 2001 Aug;16(8):1636-43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.8.1636.
PMID: 11473955BACKGROUNDMochtar MH, Van der Veen, Ziech M, van Wely M. Recombinant Luteinizing Hormone (rLH) for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in assisted reproductive cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):CD005070. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005070.pub2.
PMID: 17443569BACKGROUNDTarlatzis B, Tavmergen E, Szamatowicz M, Barash A, Amit A, Levitas E, Shoham Z. The use of recombinant human LH (lutropin alfa) in the late stimulation phase of assisted reproduction cycles: a double-blind, randomized, prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2006 Jan;21(1):90-4. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei293. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
PMID: 16172149BACKGROUNDDe Placido G, Alviggi C, Perino A, Strina I, Lisi F, Fasolino A, De Palo R, Ranieri A, Colacurci N, Mollo A; Italian Collaborative Group on Recombinant Human Luteinizing Hormone. Recombinant human LH supplementation versus recombinant human FSH (rFSH) step-up protocol during controlled ovarian stimulation in normogonadotrophic women with initial inadequate ovarian response to rFSH. A multicentre, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2005 Feb;20(2):390-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh625. Epub 2004 Dec 2.
PMID: 15576390BACKGROUND
Biospecimen
folicular aspiration fluid sampling
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
enis ozkaya
zeynep kamil education and research hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Month
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor- Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2018
First Posted
May 17, 2018
Study Start
October 17, 2018
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
January 10, 2019
Last Updated
June 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06