Nal-IRI(Nanoliposomal Irinotecan) Plus 5-FU/LV in Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer
Randomized Phase II Trial of Fluorouracil and Folinic Acid With or Without Liposomal Irinotecan (ONIVYDE) for Patients With Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer Which Progressed Following Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin
1 other identifier
interventional
178
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination of fluorouracil/folinic acid and liposomal irinotecan(Onivyde) compared with fluoruracil/folinic acid in patients with metastatic biliary tract cancer which progressed on 1st line gemcitabine/cisplatin.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Sep 2018
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 4, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedAugust 24, 2022
August 1, 2022
2.1 years
April 18, 2018
August 22, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression Free Survival by independent central reviewer
Progression-free survival is the time from the date of enrollment to the earlier of the date of confirmed progression or death from any cause.
from the date of enrollment to the earlier of the date of confirmed progression or death from any cause. (assessed up to 36 months)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Overall Survival
from the date of enrollment to death from any cause. (assessed up to 36 months)
Response rates determined by the investigator according to the RECIST(Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) v1.1
from the date of enrollment to end of treatment. (assessed up to 36 months)
EORTC-QLQ (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of life Questionnaire) C30 (version 3.0)
from the date of Screening to end of treatment. (assessed up to 36 months)
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
from the date of enrollment to 30 days after last treatment. (assessed up to 36 months)
Progression Free Survival by investigator assessment
from the date of enrollment to the earlier of the date of confirmed progression or death from any cause. (assessed up to 36 months)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
5-FU/LV/Onivyde
EXPERIMENTALOnivyde 70 mg/m2 (90 minutes), dl-LV 400mg/m2 or l-LV 200mg/m2 (30 minutes), 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 (46 hours) IV every 2 weeks.
5FU/LV
ACTIVE COMPARATORdl-LV 400mg/m2 or l-LV 200mg/m2 (30 minutes), 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 (46 hours) IV every 2 weeks.
Interventions
The recommended dose and regimen of Onivyde is 70 mg/m2 intravenously over 90 minutes, followed by dl-LV 400mg/m2 or l-LV 200mg/m2 intravenously over 30 minutes, followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 intravenously over 46 hours, administered every 2 weeks.
The recommended dose and regimen of dl-LV 400mg/m2 or l-LV 200mg/m2 intravenously over 30 minutes, followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 intravenously over 46 hours, administered every 2 weeks
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Signed and written informed consent form
- ≥ 19 years of age
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma
- Documented metastatic disease
- At least one measurable lesion according to the RECIST v1.1
- Disease progression on gemcitabine-cisplatin combination therapy
- For patients whose disease recurred after curative resection (R0 or R1), previous adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy is allowed if there is at least 6 month-interval between the last dose of adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence of disease.
- Adequate hepatic, renal and hematological function AST(Aspartate Aminotransferase), ALT(Alanine Aminotransferase) ≤ 100 IU/L (100 U/L), Cr(Creatinine) ≤ 1.5mg/dL
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status 0-1
You may not qualify if:
- Serum total bilirubin ≥2 x ULN(upper limit of normal) (biliary drainage is allowed for biliary obstruction)
- Severe renal impairment (Clcr ≤ 30 ml/min)
- Inadequate bone marrow reserves as evidenced by:
- ANC(Absolute Neutrophile Count) ≤ 1,500 cells/μl; or
- Platelet count ≤ 100,000 cells/μl; or
- Hemoglobin ≤ 9 g/dL
- ECOG performance status 2-4
- Any clinically significant disorder impacting the risk-benefit balance negatively per physician's judgment
- Any clinically significant gastrointestinal disorder, including hepatic disorders, bleeding, inflammation, occlusion, or diarrhea \> grade 2
- Severe arterial thromboembolic events (myocardial infarction, unstable angina pectoris, stroke) in last 6 months
- NYHA(New York Heart Association) Class III or IV congestive heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias or uncontrolled blood pressure. Or known abnormal ECG with clinically significant abnormal findings
- Active infection or an unexplained fever \>38.5°C (excluding tumor fever), which in the physician's opinion might compromise the patient's health
- Current use or any use in last two weeks of strong CYP3A-enzyme inducers/inhibitors and/or strong UGT1A inhibitors
- Known hypersensitivity to any of the components of Onivyde other liposomal irinotecan formulations, irinotecan, fluoropyrimidines, or leucovorin.
- Breast feeding, known pregnancy, positive serum pregnancy test or unwillingness to use an effective method of contraception, during therapy and for 3 months following the last dose of Onivyde. Females of Childbearing Potential must either agree to use and be able to take effective contraceptive birth control measures (Pearl Index \< 1) or agree to practice complete abstinence from heterosexual intercourse during the course of the study and for at least 3 months after last application of program treatment. A female subject is considered to be of childbearing potential unless she is age ≥ 50 years and naturally amenorrhoeic for ≥ 2 years, or unless she is surgically sterile. Males must agree not to father a child (including not donating sperm) during the course of the trial and for at least 6 months after last administration of study drugs.
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Changhoon Yoolead
- Ulsan University Hospitalcollaborator
- Chungnam National University Hospitalcollaborator
- Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospitalcollaborator
- Inje Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505, South Korea
Related Publications (25)
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
PMID: 26742998BACKGROUNDEdge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4.
PMID: 20180029BACKGROUNDValle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH, Cunningham D, Anthoney A, Maraveyas A, Madhusudan S, Iveson T, Hughes S, Pereira SP, Roughton M, Bridgewater J; ABC-02 Trial Investigators. Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 8;362(14):1273-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0908721.
PMID: 20375404BACKGROUNDOkusaka T, Nakachi K, Fukutomi A, Mizuno N, Ohkawa S, Funakoshi A, Nagino M, Kondo S, Nagaoka S, Funai J, Koshiji M, Nambu Y, Furuse J, Miyazaki M, Nimura Y. Gemcitabine alone or in combination with cisplatin in patients with biliary tract cancer: a comparative multicentre study in Japan. Br J Cancer. 2010 Aug 10;103(4):469-74. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605779. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
PMID: 20628385BACKGROUNDValle JW, Borbath I, Khan SA, Huguet F, Gruenberger T, Arnold D; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Biliary cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v28-v37. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw324. No abstract available.
PMID: 27664259BACKGROUNDKim BJ, Hyung J, Yoo C, Kim KP, Park SJ, Lee SS, Park DH, Song TJ, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MH, Park JH, Cho H, Ryoo BY, Chang HM. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer treated with first-line gemcitabine plus cisplatin: retrospective analysis of 740 patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Jul;80(1):209-215. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3353-2. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
PMID: 28597043BACKGROUNDFornaro L, Cereda S, Aprile G, Di Girolamo S, Santini D, Silvestris N, Lonardi S, Leone F, Milella M, Vivaldi C, Belli C, Bergamo F, Lutrino SE, Filippi R, Russano M, Vaccaro V, Brunetti AE, Rotella V, Falcone A, Barbera MA, Corbelli J, Fasola G, Aglietta M, Zagonel V, Reni M, Vasile E, Brandi G. Multivariate prognostic factors analysis for second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014 Apr 29;110(9):2165-9. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.190. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
PMID: 24714745BACKGROUNDLamarca A, Hubner RA, David Ryder W, Valle JW. Second-line chemotherapy in advanced biliary cancer: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2014 Dec;25(12):2328-2338. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu162. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
PMID: 24769639BACKGROUNDBrieau B, Dahan L, De Rycke Y, Boussaha T, Vasseur P, Tougeron D, Lecomte T, Coriat R, Bachet JB, Claudez P, Zaanan A, Soibinet P, Desrame J, Thirot-Bidault A, Trouilloud I, Mary F, Marthey L, Taieb J, Cacheux W, Lievre A. Second-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer after failure of the gemcitabine-platinum combination: A large multicenter study by the Association des Gastro-Enterologues Oncologues. Cancer. 2015 Sep 15;121(18):3290-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29471. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
PMID: 26052689BACKGROUNDKim BJ, Yoo C, Kim KP, Hyung J, Park SJ, Ryoo BY, Chang HM. Efficacy of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer after failure of gemcitabine plus cisplatin: retrospective analysis of 321 patients. Br J Cancer. 2017 Feb 28;116(5):561-567. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.446. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
PMID: 28081540BACKGROUNDInnocenti F, Kroetz DL, Schuetz E, Dolan ME, Ramirez J, Relling M, Chen P, Das S, Rosner GL, Ratain MJ. Comprehensive pharmacogenetic analysis of irinotecan neutropenia and pharmacokinetics. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 1;27(16):2604-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6300. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
PMID: 19349540BACKGROUNDBellanti F, Kagedal B, Della Pasqua O. Do pharmacokinetic polymorphisms explain treatment failure in high-risk patients with neuroblastoma? Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 May;67 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):87-107. doi: 10.1007/s00228-010-0966-3. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
PMID: 21287160BACKGROUNDMathijssen RH, van Alphen RJ, Verweij J, Loos WJ, Nooter K, Stoter G, Sparreboom A. Clinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism of irinotecan (CPT-11). Clin Cancer Res. 2001 Aug;7(8):2182-94.
PMID: 11489791BACKGROUNDKawato Y, Aonuma M, Hirota Y, Kuga H, Sato K. Intracellular roles of SN-38, a metabolite of the camptothecin derivative CPT-11, in the antitumor effect of CPT-11. Cancer Res. 1991 Aug 15;51(16):4187-91.
PMID: 1651156BACKGROUNDGarcia-Carbonero R, Supko JG. Current perspectives on the clinical experience, pharmacology, and continued development of the camptothecins. Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Mar;8(3):641-61.
PMID: 11895891BACKGROUNDVanhoefer U, Harstrick A, Achterrath W, Cao S, Seeber S, Rustum YM. Irinotecan in the treatment of colorectal cancer: clinical overview. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Mar 1;19(5):1501-18. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.5.1501.
PMID: 11230497BACKGROUNDDrummond DC, Noble CO, Guo Z, Hong K, Park JW, Kirpotin DB. Development of a highly active nanoliposomal irinotecan using a novel intraliposomal stabilization strategy. Cancer Res. 2006 Mar 15;66(6):3271-7. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4007.
PMID: 16540680BACKGROUNDKang MH, Wang J, Makena MR, Lee JS, Paz N, Hall CP, Song MM, Calderon RI, Cruz RE, Hindle A, Ko W, Fitzgerald JB, Drummond DC, Triche TJ, Reynolds CP. Activity of MM-398, nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI), in Ewing's family tumor xenografts is associated with high exposure of tumor to drug and high SLFN11 expression. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Mar 1;21(5):1139-50. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1882.
PMID: 25733708BACKGROUNDKalra AV, Kim J, Klinz SG, Paz N, Cain J, Drummond DC, Nielsen UB, Fitzgerald JB. Preclinical activity of nanoliposomal irinotecan is governed by tumor deposition and intratumor prodrug conversion. Cancer Res. 2014 Dec 1;74(23):7003-13. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0572. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
PMID: 25273092BACKGROUNDTsai CS, Park JW, Chen LT. Nanovector-based therapies in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2011 Sep;2(3):185-94. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2011.034.
PMID: 22811849BACKGROUNDBenson AB 3rd, Ajani JA, Catalano RB, Engelking C, Kornblau SM, Martenson JA Jr, McCallum R, Mitchell EP, O'Dorisio TM, Vokes EE, Wadler S. Recommended guidelines for the treatment of cancer treatment-induced diarrhea. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;22(14):2918-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.132.
PMID: 15254061BACKGROUNDWang-Gillam A, Li CP, Bodoky G, Dean A, Shan YS, Jameson G, Macarulla T, Lee KH, Cunningham D, Blanc JF, Hubner RA, Chiu CF, Schwartsmann G, Siveke JT, Braiteh F, Moyo V, Belanger B, Dhindsa N, Bayever E, Von Hoff DD, Chen LT; NAPOLI-1 Study Group. Nanoliposomal irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid in metastatic pancreatic cancer after previous gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1): a global, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016 Feb 6;387(10018):545-557. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00986-1. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
PMID: 26615328BACKGROUNDYoo C, Saborowski A, Hyung J, Wenzel P, Kim I, Wege H, Kim KP, Folprecht G, Ryoo BY, Schutt P, Cheon J, Gotze T, Ryu H, Lee JS, Vogel A. Liposomal irinotecan for previously treated patients with biliary tract cancer: A pooled analysis of NIFTY and NALIRICC trials. J Hepatol. 2025 Oct;83(4):909-916. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2025.03.013. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
PMID: 40147791DERIVEDHyung J, Kim I, Kim KP, Ryoo BY, Jeong JH, Kang MJ, Cheon J, Kang BW, Ryu H, Lee JS, Kim KW, Abou-Alfa GK, Yoo C. Treatment With Liposomal Irinotecan Plus Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Patients With Previously Treated Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer: The Phase 2b NIFTY Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023 May 1;9(5):692-699. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0016.
PMID: 36951834DERIVEDYoo C, Kim KP, Jeong JH, Kim I, Kang MJ, Cheon J, Kang BW, Ryu H, Lee JS, Kim KW, Abou-Alfa GK, Ryoo BY. Liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic biliary tract cancer after progression on gemcitabine plus cisplatin (NIFTY): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2b study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Nov;22(11):1560-1572. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00486-1. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
PMID: 34656226DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Changhoon Yoo
Asan Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 18, 2018
First Posted
May 14, 2018
Study Start
September 4, 2018
Primary Completion
September 30, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
August 24, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share