Compare Effects of Intensive Versus Conventional Lipid-lowering Therapy in Patients With Severe Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis Undergoing Stent Placement
A Prospective, Randomized Trial to Compare Effects of Intensive Versus Conventional Lipid-lowering Therapy in Patients With Severe Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis Undergoing Stent Placement
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Although expert consensuses recommend the use of statins in the treatment of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis, in patients with severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis undergoing stent placement, the related investigation focused on renal protection by intensive lipid-lowering therapy is scant , and the optimal target level for lipid reduction remain uncertain. Therefore, we hypothesized that intensive lipid lowering could offer more benefits with respect to renal function in the patients with percutaneous renal artery stenting. We conducted the prospective randomized unblinded trial to compare the renal-protective effect of intensive lipid lowering with that of conventional lipid lowering in patients underwent renal artery stenting (75 patients in each study group)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Jun 2013
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2018
CompletedMay 29, 2018
May 1, 2018
1.6 years
April 29, 2018
May 25, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate
12 months after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change in urinary albumin-creatinine ratio
12 months after randomization
Change in the number of antihypertensive medications
12 months after randomization
Change in systolic blood pressure
12 months after randomization
Change in diastolic blood pressure
12 months after randomization
Stent restenosis rate
12 months after randomization
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intensive lipid lowering group
EXPERIMENTAL10 mg/d rosuvastatin was initially prescribed and target LDL-C was \< 1.8mmol/L
Conventional lipid lowering group
OTHER5 mg/d rosuvastatin was initially prescribed and target LDL-C was ≥1.8mmol/L, \<3.3mmol/L
Interventions
For patients who were assigned to receive intensive lipid lowering, 10 mg/d rosuvastatin was initially prescribed and target LDL-C was \< 1.8mmol/L. For patients who were assigned to receive conventional lipid lowering, 5 mg/d rosuvastatin was initially prescribed and target LDL-C was ≥1.8mmol/L, \<3.3mmol/L.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Angiographic evidence of severe atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (diameter reduction≥ 70%) with ≥ 20 mmHg systolic translesional gradient or positive captopril renography in the target kidney;
- Sustained systolic blood pressure ≥ 180 mmHg, and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mmHg while not receiving drug therapy or systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg, and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90mmHg while taking standard triple-drug combination treatment (including one diuretic);
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate≥ 10 ml/min/1.73m2 with longitudinal kidney length ≥ 7 cm supplied by target artery;
- Serum creatinine level\<264umol/L;
- Urine protein≤ 1+
You may not qualify if:
- Allergy to rosuvastatin;
- Myopathy;
- Active liver disease or alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase levels ≥ three times the upper limit of normality;
- Serious perioperative complications;
- Severe chronic congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association functional class IV );
- Patients who should be excluded basing on physician discretion.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 010, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Xiongjing Jiang, MD
Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Disease, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2018
First Posted
May 11, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 30, 2014
Study Completion
December 30, 2015
Last Updated
May 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05