NCT03521102

Brief Summary

Intravenous opioids are the mainstay of acute, severe pain treatment in Emergency Departments (ED) across the country. Acetaminophen, given orally, has also been used for treatment of mild to moderate pain. The more potent intravenous (IV) form of acetaminophen has been widely used in Europe for more than 20 years as post-surgical analgesia and received full FDA approval in the USA in 2010. As part of a continuing set of studies whose goal is to optimize treatment of pain among elderly ED patients, this randomized study will compare efficacy and safety of IV acetaminophen to IV hydromorphone.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
162

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2018

Typical duration for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 26, 2018

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 11, 2018

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 20, 2018

Completed
3.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 30, 2021

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 23, 2022

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 2, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

March 2, 2023

Status Verified

February 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.2 years

First QC Date

April 26, 2018

Results QC Date

December 6, 2022

Last Update Submit

February 2, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical Improvement in NRS Pain Score

    Pain improvement was assessed using an NRS (numeric rating scale) to assess pain on a range of 0-10. Participants were asked to verbalize intensity of pain on the scale with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable." Pain was assessed at baseline and 60 minutes later to determine if clinically important improvement in pain was achieved. Clinically important improvement in pain was defined as an improvement of \>=1.3 points on the 0-10 scale.

    60 minutes following administration of medication

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Need for Rescue Medication

    120 minutes following administration of medication

  • Improvement in NPS Pain Score by >=50%

    60 minutes after administration of medication

Study Arms (2)

Acetaminophen 1000mg IV

EXPERIMENTAL

NRS pain score will be obtained at baseline, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes following completion of intervention. Adverse events will be recorded every 15 minutes for the duration of the study protocol. Participants will be reassessed for the need of additional pain control at 60 minutes.

Drug: Acetaminophen 1000mg IV

Hydromorphone 0.5mg IV

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

NRS pain score will be checked at 5 minutes and every 15 minutes thereafter for 120 minutes. Adverse events will be recorded every 15 minutes for the duration of the study protocol. The need for additional pain control will be assessed at 60 minutes.

Drug: Hydromorphone 0.5 mg IV

Interventions

1000mg of IV acetaminophen in 100ml of normal saline, administered as an intravenous drip over 10 minutes + 2ml of normal saline, administered as a slow intravenous push

Acetaminophen 1000mg IV

100ml of normal saline, administered as an intravenous drip over 10 minutes, + 0.5mg of IV hydromorphone in 2ml of normal saline, administered as a slow intravenous push

Hydromorphone 0.5mg IV

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age equal to 65 or greater
  • Pain onset within 7 days with severe pain
  • Has capacity to provide informed consent
  • Understanding English or Spanish

You may not qualify if:

  • Use of tramadol or opioids within 7 days
  • Use of acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications within 8 hours
  • Chronic pain syndrome: daily pain for \> 3 months. Sickle cell anemia, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and peripheral neuropathies
  • Conditions which may affect acetaminophen or opioid metabolism such as cirrhosis (Child Pugh A or worse), kidney impairment (CKD 3 or worse), active hepatic disease or severe dehydration
  • Alcohol intoxication
  • Systolic blood pressure: \< 100 mmHg
  • Heart rate: \< 60 beats per minute
  • Oxygen saturation: \< 95% on room air
  • Use of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors in the past 30 days
  • Use of transdermal pain patch or oral opioid \> 10 days in the prior month
  • Prior enrollment in the same study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Montefiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Kolli S, Friedman BW, Latev A, Chang AK, Naeem F, Feliciano C, Afrifa F, Walker C, Izzo A, Irizarry E. A Randomized Study of Intravenous Hydromorphone Versus Intravenous Acetaminophen for Older Adult Patients with Acute Severe Pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;80(5):432-439. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.06.016. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Acute Pain

Interventions

AcetaminophenHydromorphone

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AcetanilidesAnilidesAmidesOrganic ChemicalsAniline CompoundsAminesMorphine DerivativesMorphinansOpiate AlkaloidsAlkaloidsHeterocyclic CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, Bridged-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More RingsHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingPhenanthrenesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsPolycyclic Compounds

Limitations and Caveats

Enrollment limited to 2 urban EDs, excluding a large number of patients who had been screened. Results may not be generalizable to all older patients with acute severe pain Dose ranging studies were not conducted to help optimize hydromorphone dosage An arbitrary value (1.3) was selected as the minimum clinically important improvement threshold The study relied on the clinical attending physician's judgment of whether opioids were indicated. Would not account for local practices

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Benjamin Friedman
Organization
Montefiore Medical Center

Study Officials

  • Benjamin Friedman, MD

    Montefiore Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2018

First Posted

May 11, 2018

Study Start

August 20, 2018

Primary Completion

October 30, 2021

Study Completion

March 23, 2022

Last Updated

March 2, 2023

Results First Posted

March 2, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-02

Locations