Acetaminophen Versus IV Hydromorphone for Pain in the Elderly in the ED
An ED-based Randomized Trial of IV Acetaminophen Versus IV Hydromorphone for Elderly Adults With Acute Severe Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
162
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Intravenous opioids are the mainstay of acute, severe pain treatment in Emergency Departments (ED) across the country. Acetaminophen, given orally, has also been used for treatment of mild to moderate pain. The more potent intravenous (IV) form of acetaminophen has been widely used in Europe for more than 20 years as post-surgical analgesia and received full FDA approval in the USA in 2010. As part of a continuing set of studies whose goal is to optimize treatment of pain among elderly ED patients, this randomized study will compare efficacy and safety of IV acetaminophen to IV hydromorphone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Aug 2018
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 23, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 2, 2023
CompletedMarch 2, 2023
February 1, 2023
3.2 years
April 26, 2018
December 6, 2022
February 2, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Improvement in NRS Pain Score
Pain improvement was assessed using an NRS (numeric rating scale) to assess pain on a range of 0-10. Participants were asked to verbalize intensity of pain on the scale with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable." Pain was assessed at baseline and 60 minutes later to determine if clinically important improvement in pain was achieved. Clinically important improvement in pain was defined as an improvement of \>=1.3 points on the 0-10 scale.
60 minutes following administration of medication
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Need for Rescue Medication
120 minutes following administration of medication
Improvement in NPS Pain Score by >=50%
60 minutes after administration of medication
Study Arms (2)
Acetaminophen 1000mg IV
EXPERIMENTALNRS pain score will be obtained at baseline, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes following completion of intervention. Adverse events will be recorded every 15 minutes for the duration of the study protocol. Participants will be reassessed for the need of additional pain control at 60 minutes.
Hydromorphone 0.5mg IV
ACTIVE COMPARATORNRS pain score will be checked at 5 minutes and every 15 minutes thereafter for 120 minutes. Adverse events will be recorded every 15 minutes for the duration of the study protocol. The need for additional pain control will be assessed at 60 minutes.
Interventions
1000mg of IV acetaminophen in 100ml of normal saline, administered as an intravenous drip over 10 minutes + 2ml of normal saline, administered as a slow intravenous push
100ml of normal saline, administered as an intravenous drip over 10 minutes, + 0.5mg of IV hydromorphone in 2ml of normal saline, administered as a slow intravenous push
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age equal to 65 or greater
- Pain onset within 7 days with severe pain
- Has capacity to provide informed consent
- Understanding English or Spanish
You may not qualify if:
- Use of tramadol or opioids within 7 days
- Use of acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications within 8 hours
- Chronic pain syndrome: daily pain for \> 3 months. Sickle cell anemia, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and peripheral neuropathies
- Conditions which may affect acetaminophen or opioid metabolism such as cirrhosis (Child Pugh A or worse), kidney impairment (CKD 3 or worse), active hepatic disease or severe dehydration
- Alcohol intoxication
- Systolic blood pressure: \< 100 mmHg
- Heart rate: \< 60 beats per minute
- Oxygen saturation: \< 95% on room air
- Use of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors in the past 30 days
- Use of transdermal pain patch or oral opioid \> 10 days in the prior month
- Prior enrollment in the same study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467, United States
Related Publications (1)
Kolli S, Friedman BW, Latev A, Chang AK, Naeem F, Feliciano C, Afrifa F, Walker C, Izzo A, Irizarry E. A Randomized Study of Intravenous Hydromorphone Versus Intravenous Acetaminophen for Older Adult Patients with Acute Severe Pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;80(5):432-439. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.06.016. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
PMID: 35965162DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Enrollment limited to 2 urban EDs, excluding a large number of patients who had been screened. Results may not be generalizable to all older patients with acute severe pain Dose ranging studies were not conducted to help optimize hydromorphone dosage An arbitrary value (1.3) was selected as the minimum clinically important improvement threshold The study relied on the clinical attending physician's judgment of whether opioids were indicated. Would not account for local practices
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Benjamin Friedman
- Organization
- Montefiore Medical Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Benjamin Friedman, MD
Montefiore Medical Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2018
First Posted
May 11, 2018
Study Start
August 20, 2018
Primary Completion
October 30, 2021
Study Completion
March 23, 2022
Last Updated
March 2, 2023
Results First Posted
March 2, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02