Utility of a Supraaponeurotic Mesh as Prophylaxis of the Midline Eventration After an Oncological Colorrectal Resection
1 other identifier
interventional
154
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Randomized prospective experimental study, in which the effect of a prophylactic mesh is assessed in the eventration rate diagnosed by CT at one year after surgery in patients with CRC who underwent elective intervention for supra-infraumbilical midline laparotomy, considering as treatment the supra-aponeurotic mesh positioning (experimental group), and comparing it to the standard closing with a continuous suture using slow absorption monofilament.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 9, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2020
CompletedAugust 13, 2019
August 1, 2019
3.9 years
April 27, 2018
August 12, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Eventration rate
To assess the effect of the prophylactic mesh in the eventration rate diagnosed by CT at one year after surgery in patients with CRC who underwent elective intervention for supra-infraumbilical midline laparotomy.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Complications rate
1 year
Short and long term derived costs
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Supraaponeurotic mesh
EXPERIMENTALPatients with laparotomy closure by conventional approach of aponeurosis (continuous suture with monofilament of slow absorption), and posterior placement of supraaponeurotic mesh of polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) medium / low density and wide pore. The mesh has a longitudinal measurement that exceeds about 3 cm the upper and lower ends of the wound and width should not be less than 10 cm, therefore the mesh selected is DynaMesh®-CICAT longitudinal measure 10x35 cm. The mesh is fixed to the aponeurosis with a crown of loose stitches and points to the midline. A prolene 2/0 non-reabsorbable monofilament suture of cylindrical needle is used. A 10 Fr suction drainage is placed in the supraaponeurotic plane, with an exit to the exterior beyond the edges of the prosthesis. Drainage will be preserved for a minimum of 48 hours after surgery, and will be withdrawn when a debit of less than 50 ml is presented in 24 h.
Monofilament
NO INTERVENTIONPatients with conventional closure of the middle laparotomy with approach of aponeurosis in a plane by continuous suture with monofilament of slow absorption. In this study, the suture used in all patients will be poly-4-hydroxybutyrate or Mono-max loop®.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elective surgery for colorectal cancer.
- Surgery by middle laparotomy.
- Informed consent signed by the patient.
- Age \> 18 years.
You may not qualify if:
- Midline hernia or eventration.
- Presence of mesh in the abdominal wall because of a previous surgery.
- Palliative surgery.
- Synchronous metastases (Stage IV cancer according to TNM).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe
Valencia, Spain
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matteo Frasson
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Double blind, for the patient and the radiologist who analyses the results of the imaging tests.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2018
First Posted
May 9, 2018
Study Start
June 27, 2016
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
June 1, 2020
Last Updated
August 13, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share