Quality of Life in Patients With Multimetastatic Melanoma Currently in Remission (QUALM)
QUALM
Evaluation of the Quality of Life in Patients With Multimetastatic Melanoma Currently in Remission
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Few studies have been conducted on the quality of life of patients with stage IV melanoma. Particularly, there is no data regarding the quality of life of patients with a multimetastatic melanoma currently in remission. Then, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the quality of life from a point of view medico-psycho-social in patients with multimetastatic melanoma in remission for more than 6 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Apr 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 5, 2018
CompletedJuly 19, 2018
July 1, 2018
2 months
April 25, 2018
July 18, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Quality of life assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M) questionnaire
The FACT-M questionnaire is a specific quality of life scale for patients treated for melanoma. It includes 51 items grouped into nine multi-item scores: six subscale scores and three summary scores. The six subscales consist of four subscales from the FACT-G: * physical well-being \[PWB\], score range: 0-28, higher values represent a worse outcome. * social well-being \[SWB\], score range: 0-28, higher values represent a better outcome. * emotional well-being \[EWB\], score range: 0-24, higher values represent a worse outcome. * functional well-being \[FWB\]), score range: 0-28, higher values represent a better outcome. One Melanoma scale, score range: 0-64, higher values represent a worse outcome. One Melanoma surgery scale, score range: 0-32, higher values represent a worse outcome. The three summary scores include: * the FACT-M Trial Outcome Index (TOI), score range: 0-120 * the FACT-G total score, score range: 0-108 * the FACT-M total score, score range: 0-172
day 0
Health status surveyed by the Medical Outcome Study Short Form - 36 (MOS SF 36) questionnaire
The SF-36 consists of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability. The eight sections are: * vitality * physical functioning * bodily pain * general health perceptions * physical role functioning * emotional role functioning * social role functioning * mental health
day 0
Study Arms (1)
Multimetastatic melanoma in remission
Questionnaires
Interventions
FACT-M (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Melanoma) questionnaire, MOS SF (medical outcome study short form) -36 questionnaire
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with multimetastatic melanoma currently in remission
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients
- Presenting a stage IV melanoma of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification (multimetastatic) in remission for more than 6 months:
- Complete remission (defined as the complete disappearance of target lesions according to the RECIST criteria, based on a thoraco-abdomino-pelvic CT scan and a brain Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or
- Complete metabolic remission (defined as the complete disappearance of target lesions in PET CT (positron emission tomography computed tomograph, that is to say, disappearance of the hypermetabolic character of the anatomic structures. There may remain target lesions in conventional CT but they are not hypermetabolic in PET CT)
- Patients able to answer the questionnaires
- Patients with enough understanding of the French language
You may not qualify if:
- Adjuvant treatment
- Patient under tutorship or curatorship
- Refusal to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Lille Catholic Universitylead
- University Hospital, Lillecollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Lille Catholic Hospitals
Lille, Nord, 59020, France
CHRU Lille
Lille, Nord, 59037, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aurore Le Guern
Lille Catholic University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2018
First Posted
May 8, 2018
Study Start
April 9, 2018
Primary Completion
June 5, 2018
Study Completion
June 5, 2018
Last Updated
July 19, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share