NCT03518749

Brief Summary

Deficient cognitive control (CC) is one of the central characteristics of major depression (MD). Hypoactivation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) has been linked with this deficit. Antidepressants and cognitive-behavioral therapies modify CC most-likely as a common mechanism of treatment. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, simple and effective non-invasive method to modulate the cortical excitability. It has been shown, that the activity of the dlPFC can be modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with polarity-dependent learning-phase specific effects on performance that, when combined with training, can outlast the stimulation. The goal of this randomized, sham-controlled, rater blind clinical trial is to investigate the effect of a tDCS-enhanced CC Training (CCT) on depressive symptom severity and compare the stimulation intensities 1mA, 2mA and sham tDCS. Overall, the study will include 57 participants (n = 19 per group). Each participant will complete 12 training sessions with online sham/ anodal tDCS. As a training task we will use an adaptive version of the paced auditory serial addition task (PASAT). In the PASAT, digits are presented auditive and participants have to add the current digit to the digit they heard before. In the adaptive version the interstimulus-intervals decrease (increase) when four consecutive trials are correct (incorrect). The PASAT is known to elicit frustration. Participants have to exert cognitive control over these emotions to complete the task successfully. Before, during and after the training symptom severity will be assessed. Baseline and post-training performance in the PASAT and in a transfer task (delayed working memory task, DWM) will be measured. To further explore variables that influence the effect of tDCS on depressive symptom severity we will measure brain activity (EEG, NIRS), heart rate, global functioning (GAF), emotion regulation strategies, self-esteem, mood ratings and subjective performance ratings before and after the training and collect genetic factors. Sustainability of the training effects will be measured at a follow-up visit (3 months later).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
57

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 19, 2018

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 13, 2018

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 8, 2018

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 19, 2019

Status Verified

February 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

April 13, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 15, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Depressiontranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change of MADRS scores

    Change in Depressive Symptom severity will be measured with the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) from Baseline session to the last stimulation session, scale range from 0 to 60 points, higher scores indicate a more severe depression

    Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the last training session (week 4, day 26)

Secondary Outcomes (13)

  • BDI scores

    Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)

  • Number of correct trials in the PASAT

    Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)

  • RT in the DWM

    Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)

  • Number of correct trials in the DWM

    Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average), in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average) and at follow-up (week 17, day 110 on average)

  • GAF score

    Assessment one week before training start (week -1, day -5 on average) and in the post training session (week 5, day 31 on average)

  • +8 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

1mA anodal tDCS + cognitive control training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

1 mA anodal tDCS will be administered to the left dlPFC (F3) for 23 mins during the performance of a cognitive control training.

Other: 1mA tDCSBehavioral: Cognitive control training

2mA tDCS + cognitive control training

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

2 mA anodal tDCS will be administered to the left dlPFC (F3) for 23 mins during the performance of a cognitive control training.

Other: 2mA tDCSBehavioral: Cognitive control training

sham tDCS + cognitive control training

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Sham tDCS (30 secs of tDCS) will be administered to the left dlPFC (F3) with 2mA at the beginning of a cognitive control training.

Behavioral: Cognitive control training

Interventions

transcranial direct current stimulation with the intensity of 1mA

1mA anodal tDCS + cognitive control training

transcranial direct current stimulation with the intensity of 2mA

2mA tDCS + cognitive control training

cognitive control training with the PASAT

1mA anodal tDCS + cognitive control training2mA tDCS + cognitive control trainingsham tDCS + cognitive control training

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • current Major Depressive Episode
  • right handedness

You may not qualify if:

  • history of seizures
  • Intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head, excluding the mouth, that cannot be safely removed
  • pregnancy
  • use of mood stabilizers
  • diagnosed bipolar disorder
  • current substance abuse (nicotine excluded)
  • current substance addiction (nicotine excluded)
  • diagnosed psychotic diseases
  • diagnosed anorexia nervosa
  • diagnosed personality disorders: cluster A, antisocial personality disorder,
  • borderline personality disorder

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Tuebingen

Tübingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 72076, Germany

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Sommer A, Fallgatter AJ, Plewnia C. Investigating mechanisms of cognitive control training: neural signatures of PASAT performance in depressed patients. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2022 Jun;129(5-6):649-659. doi: 10.1007/s00702-021-02444-7. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Depressive Disorder, MajorDepression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Depressive DisorderMood DisordersMental DisordersBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 13, 2018

First Posted

May 8, 2018

Study Start

March 19, 2018

Primary Completion

October 1, 2019

Study Completion

December 31, 2019

Last Updated

February 19, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations