Naloxone Nasal Spray Compared With Naloxone Injection for Opioid Overdoses Outside the Hospital
NINA-1
NTNU Intranasal Naloxone Trial - a Double Blinded, Double Dummy, Randomized Controlled Trial of Intranasal Naloxone for Pre-hospital Use
2 other identifiers
interventional
286
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This trial will compare the clinical response to intramuscular and intranasal naloxone in pre-hospital opioid overdoses. Objective of the study is to measure and evaluate clinical response (return of spontaneous respiration within 10 minutes of naloxone administration) to a new nasal naloxone formulation in real opioid overdoses in the pre-hospital environment. The aim is to demonstrate that intranasal administration of naloxone is not clinically inferior to intramuscular administration, which is now standard treatment of care.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2018
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 3, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 6, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 6, 2020
CompletedOctober 8, 2020
October 1, 2020
2.4 years
May 3, 2018
October 7, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients with return of spontaneous respiration (above or equal to 10 breaths per minute) within 10 minutes of naloxone administration in pre-hospital opioid overdose
40 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Changes in Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in patients treated with study medicine for opioid overdose
The time participants are in the care of ambulance personnel, estimated 40 minutes
Changes in oxygen saturation (SaO2) in patients treated with study medicine for opioid overdose
The time participants are in the care of ambulance personnel, estimated 40 minutes
Overdose complications
The time participants are in the care of ambulance personnel, estimated 40 minutes
Time from administration of naloxone to respiration above or equal to 10 breaths per minute
The time participants are in the care of ambulance personnel, estimated 40 minutes
Opioid withdrawal reaction to naloxone reversal
The time participants are in the care of ambulance personnel, estimated 40 minutes
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Naloxone, intranasal
EXPERIMENTALNaloxone, intramuscular
ACTIVE COMPARATORplacebo, intranasal
PLACEBO COMPARATORplacebo, intramuscular
PLACEBO COMPARATORInterventions
Active compound naloxone 14 mg/ml, (±10%). Nasal spray will be administered with one puff (100 microL ±10%) in one nostril (1.4 mg dose) using the Aptar Unitdose device. The spray device should be inserted about 1 cm into a nostril, pointing towards the ipsilateral ear and the plunger pushed in a firm and gentle manner for the formulation to be sprayed into the nose. After the plunger is inserted the device is immediately removed from the nose and assisted ventilation continued.
Same spray but without naloxone. Nasal spray will be administered with one puff (100 microL +/- 10%) in one nostril using the Aptar Unitdose device. The spray device should be inserted about 1 cm into a nostril, pointing towards the ipsilateral ear and the plunger pushed in a firm and gentle manner for the formulation to be sprayed into the nose. After the plunger is inserted the device is immediately removed from the nose and assisted ventilation continued.
Intramuscular comparator Naloxone Hydrochloride 0.4 mg/ml will be administered as a 2 ml intramuscular (IM) injection in the deltoid muscle, total dose of 0,8 mg naloxone IM
Intramuscular Sodium Chloride Injection 9mg/ml, will be administered as a 2 ml intramuscular injection in the deltoid muscle
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Suspected opioid overdose clinically diagnosed by emergency medical service (EMS) based on the following criteria
- Reduced (below and equal to 8 breaths per minute) or absent spontaneous respiration
- Miosis
- Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) below 12
- Palpable carotid or radial arterial pulse
You may not qualify if:
- Cardiac arrest
- Failure to assist ventilation using mask-bag technique
- Facial trauma or epistaxis or visible nasal blockage
- Iatrogenic opioid overdose when opioid is administered in- hospital, or by EMS or other health care workers in the pre- hospital setting
- Suspected or visibly pregnant participant
- Has received naloxone by any route in the current overdose
- in prison or custody by police
- EMS staff without training as study workers
- No study drug available
- Study drug frozen as indicated by Freeze Watch in kit or past its expiry date
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Norwegian University of Science and Technologylead
- St. Olavs Hospitalcollaborator
- Oslo University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Oslo University Hospital, Prehospital devision
Oslo, Norway
St Olavs Hospital, Department for Emergency Medicine and Prehospital Services
Trondheim, Norway
Related Publications (2)
Skulberg AK, Tylleskar I, Valberg M, Braarud AC, Dale J, Heyerdahl F, Skalhegg T, Barstein J, Mellesmo S, Dale O. Comparison of intranasal and intramuscular naloxone in opioid overdoses managed by ambulance staff: a double-dummy, randomised, controlled trial. Addiction. 2022 Jun;117(6):1658-1667. doi: 10.1111/add.15806. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
PMID: 35137493DERIVEDSkulberg AK, Tylleskar I, Braarud AC, Dale J, Heyerdahl F, Mellesmo S, Valberg M, Dale O. NTNU intranasal naloxone trial (NINA-1) study protocol for a double-blind, double-dummy, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing intranasal 1.4 mg to intramuscular 0.8 mg naloxone for prehospital use. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 12;10(11):e041556. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041556.
PMID: 33184084DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Øystein Risa
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Arne K Skulberg, MD PhD
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The whole study team, including the statistician, will be blinded until after database lock and the primary analysis are done. The allocation list will be stored by by the Hospital Pharmacy Trondheim. There will not be automatic unblinding of SAEs. Study personnel do not have any access to the allocation list. An emergency option for individual unblinding is available to medical monitor in case of SAE/ SUSAR Study workers are blinded to the different preparations. This is carefully performed by covering the vials with neutral and opaque labels for "study drug". The risk of for unintentional unblinding is very small. The procedure for securing credible blinding is described in the study protocol and approved by the Norwegian Medicines Agency.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 3, 2018
First Posted
May 8, 2018
Study Start
May 15, 2018
Primary Completion
October 6, 2020
Study Completion
October 6, 2020
Last Updated
October 8, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Updated regularly, but no later than one year after publication of main results
- Access Criteria
- NTNU will require data processor agreements for recipients conform to standards set out in Norwegian Law and the European General Data Protection Regulation. Any shared datasets will have pseudonymisation of personal data. If doubt NTNU will seek advice from Ethics Committee.
NTNU has complete ownership and publishing rights of all results, regardless of outcome. The full protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, information letter for consent and other trial documents will be published open access in the NTNU Open repository. The Clinical Study report and Statistical Analysis Report will also be made openly available, but open versions may be censored to ensure that it will not be possible to identify individual study participants. The datasets analysed during the current study will be made available from NTNU upon reasonable request and a methodological sound proposal based on the consent given by participants.