Investigating Hope and Expectations in Open-Label Placebos
I-HELP
Hope and Expectations as Components of Open-Label Placebos: An Experimental Study Investigating Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Research has shown that placebo effects contribute substantially to clinical outcomes. Recent evidence suggests that placebos remain effective even if they are openly described as placebos (so-called Open-Label Placebos). In this study, the investigators examine hope and expectations as components of open-label placebos in an experimental study investigating pain..
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain
Started Feb 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 10, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 21, 2018
CompletedAugust 23, 2018
August 1, 2018
5 months
March 7, 2018
August 22, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in pain intensity scale
Change in subjective pain intensity assessed using a visual analogue scale (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher values reflecting more pain intensity)
Baseline and 45 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in pain unpleasantness scale
Baseline and 45 minutes
Change in physiological heat pain threshold
Baseline and 45 minutes
Change in physiological heat pain tolerance
Baseline and 45 minutes
Study Arms (4)
Deceptive Placebo (DP)
EXPERIMENTALAfter pretreatment heat pain assessment, participants are informed that they are about to receive an effective analgesic cream. In fact, they receive a placebo cream. Next, the posttreatment pain assessment is conducted.
OLP with Hope (OLP Hope)
EXPERIMENTALAfter pretreatment heat pain assessment, participants are informed that they are about to receive an placebo cream. They are told that the cream has no active pharmacological ingredient. However, using verbal instructions, the investigator aims to induce hope among the participants that the cream could have a positive effect. Next, the posttreatment pain assessment is conducted.
OLP with Expectations (OLP Expectation)
EXPERIMENTALAfter pretreatment heat pain assessment, participants are informed that they are about to receive an placebo cream. They are told that the cream has no active pharmacological ingredient. However, using verbal instructions, the investigator aims to raise expectations among the participants that the cream will have a positive effect. Next, the posttreatment pain assessment is conducted.
Control
EXPERIMENTALAfter pretreatment heat pain assessment, this group does not receive an intervention targeting pain sensation prior to the posttreatment pain assessment.
Interventions
Participants are informed that they are about to receive an effective analgesic cream. They are instructed to apply the cream using a cotton pad.
Participants are informed that they are about to receive an placebo cream. They are told that the cream has no active pharmacological ingredient. Therefore, participants are supposed to evaluate the subjective probability for a positive effect of the cream as rather low. However, using verbal instructions, the investigator aims to induce hope among the participants that the cream could have a positive effect for them because this placebo cream did have a positive among some former participants who were similar to the current participant. The emphasis of this similarity (regarding age and sex) aims to induce a feeling of connectedness to previous participants who reported positive effects of the placebo cream.
Participants are informed that they are about to receive an placebo cream. They are told that the cream has no active pharmacological ingredient. However, participants are told that placebos have been shown to contribute substantially to clinical outcomes such as pain intensity/unpleasantness. This positive effect of placebos is reasoned by explaining learning mechanisms such as classical conditioning. We anticipated that after hearing this instruction, participants would consider it to be likely that the placebo has a positive effect for them.
The participants receive an inert placebo cream (standard basic cream with oil of thyme produced by a local pharmacy).
Participant receive heat pain stimuli using the suprathreshold method of the Thermo Sensory Analyser (TSA-II), a commonly used device to study pain sensation and analgesic effects.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- sufficient German language knowledge
- at least 18 years old
You may not qualify if:
- current mental disorder
- current medical disease
- studying psychology or medicine
- pregnancy or breastfeeding period
- intake of drugs
- severely visually impaired
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Philipps-University of Marburg
Marburg, Hesse, 35037, Germany
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tobias Kube, M. Sc.
Philipps University Marburg
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Using a cover story, participants are instructed to think that there are three experimental groups: a treatment condition, a placebo condition, and a control condition. Therefore, participants from the open-label groups do know that they receive a placebo, but do not know which specific mechanism is being addressed in their condition.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2018
First Posted
May 7, 2018
Study Start
February 10, 2018
Primary Completion
June 30, 2018
Study Completion
August 21, 2018
Last Updated
August 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No IPD will be shared