NCT03517644

Brief Summary

Research has shown that placebo effects contribute substantially to clinical outcomes. Recent evidence suggests that placebos remain effective even if they are openly described as placebos (so-called Open-Label Placebos). In this study, the investigators examine hope and expectations as components of open-label placebos in an experimental study investigating pain..

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable pain

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 10, 2018

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 7, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 7, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 21, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

August 23, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

March 7, 2018

Last Update Submit

August 22, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in pain intensity scale

    Change in subjective pain intensity assessed using a visual analogue scale (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher values reflecting more pain intensity)

    Baseline and 45 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Change in pain unpleasantness scale

    Baseline and 45 minutes

  • Change in physiological heat pain threshold

    Baseline and 45 minutes

  • Change in physiological heat pain tolerance

    Baseline and 45 minutes

Study Arms (4)

Deceptive Placebo (DP)

EXPERIMENTAL

After pretreatment heat pain assessment, participants are informed that they are about to receive an effective analgesic cream. In fact, they receive a placebo cream. Next, the posttreatment pain assessment is conducted.

Other: DPOther: Placebo creamOther: Heat pain

OLP with Hope (OLP Hope)

EXPERIMENTAL

After pretreatment heat pain assessment, participants are informed that they are about to receive an placebo cream. They are told that the cream has no active pharmacological ingredient. However, using verbal instructions, the investigator aims to induce hope among the participants that the cream could have a positive effect. Next, the posttreatment pain assessment is conducted.

Other: OLP HopeOther: Placebo creamOther: Heat pain

OLP with Expectations (OLP Expectation)

EXPERIMENTAL

After pretreatment heat pain assessment, participants are informed that they are about to receive an placebo cream. They are told that the cream has no active pharmacological ingredient. However, using verbal instructions, the investigator aims to raise expectations among the participants that the cream will have a positive effect. Next, the posttreatment pain assessment is conducted.

Other: OLP ExpectationOther: Placebo creamOther: Heat pain

Control

EXPERIMENTAL

After pretreatment heat pain assessment, this group does not receive an intervention targeting pain sensation prior to the posttreatment pain assessment.

Other: Heat pain

Interventions

DPOTHER

Participants are informed that they are about to receive an effective analgesic cream. They are instructed to apply the cream using a cotton pad.

Deceptive Placebo (DP)

Participants are informed that they are about to receive an placebo cream. They are told that the cream has no active pharmacological ingredient. Therefore, participants are supposed to evaluate the subjective probability for a positive effect of the cream as rather low. However, using verbal instructions, the investigator aims to induce hope among the participants that the cream could have a positive effect for them because this placebo cream did have a positive among some former participants who were similar to the current participant. The emphasis of this similarity (regarding age and sex) aims to induce a feeling of connectedness to previous participants who reported positive effects of the placebo cream.

OLP with Hope (OLP Hope)

Participants are informed that they are about to receive an placebo cream. They are told that the cream has no active pharmacological ingredient. However, participants are told that placebos have been shown to contribute substantially to clinical outcomes such as pain intensity/unpleasantness. This positive effect of placebos is reasoned by explaining learning mechanisms such as classical conditioning. We anticipated that after hearing this instruction, participants would consider it to be likely that the placebo has a positive effect for them.

OLP with Expectations (OLP Expectation)

The participants receive an inert placebo cream (standard basic cream with oil of thyme produced by a local pharmacy).

Deceptive Placebo (DP)OLP with Expectations (OLP Expectation)OLP with Hope (OLP Hope)

Participant receive heat pain stimuli using the suprathreshold method of the Thermo Sensory Analyser (TSA-II), a commonly used device to study pain sensation and analgesic effects.

ControlDeceptive Placebo (DP)OLP with Expectations (OLP Expectation)OLP with Hope (OLP Hope)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • sufficient German language knowledge
  • at least 18 years old

You may not qualify if:

  • current mental disorder
  • current medical disease
  • studying psychology or medicine
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding period
  • intake of drugs
  • severely visually impaired

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Philipps-University of Marburg

Marburg, Hesse, 35037, Germany

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Tobias Kube, M. Sc.

    Philipps University Marburg

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Using a cover story, participants are instructed to think that there are three experimental groups: a treatment condition, a placebo condition, and a control condition. Therefore, participants from the open-label groups do know that they receive a placebo, but do not know which specific mechanism is being addressed in their condition.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants are assigned to one of four experimental groups in parallel for the duration of the study
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 7, 2018

First Posted

May 7, 2018

Study Start

February 10, 2018

Primary Completion

June 30, 2018

Study Completion

August 21, 2018

Last Updated

August 23, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No IPD will be shared

Locations