EMDR Versus Treatment As Usual in Patients With Substance Use Disorder
A Multicenter Phase II Rater-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing Therapy vs. Treatment as Usual in Patients With Substance Use Disorder and History of Psychological Trauma
1 other identifier
interventional
142
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The main objective of this project is to test whether EMDR therapy is effective in reducing substance use and improving clinical and trauma-related symptoms in SUD patients with a history of psychological trauma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 4, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 7, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2022
CompletedMarch 31, 2022
March 1, 2021
4.2 years
April 4, 2018
March 30, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Reduction in severity of consumption
To measure changes in the Severity of Dependence Scale. 4-point Likert scale (0 - 3). The higher score indicate greater dependence.
Changes from baseline to visits at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Reduction in level of consumption
To measure changes in the Visual Analog Scale. It ranges from 0 to 10: the higher the score, the greater the craving severity.
Changes from baseline to visits at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Reduction in the number of relapses
To measure relapses with the Timeline Followback Questionnaire. It is a retrospective calendar-based measure of daily substance use.
Change of relapses from baseline to visits at 3, 6 and 12 months.
Reduction of (hypo) manic symptoms associated with a comorbid psychiatric disorder
To measure changes in the Young Mania Rating Scale. It ranges from 0 to 130: the higher the score, the worse the manic symptoms.
Changes from baseline to visits at 6 and 12 months.
Reduction of general psychopathological symptoms associated with psychiatric comorbidity
To measure changes in the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. It ranges from 18 to 126: the higher the score, the worse the general psychopathology symptoms.
Change from baseline to visits at 6 and 12 months.
Reduction in depressive symptoms associated with a comorbid psychiatric disorder
To measure changes in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Total scores range from 0 to 52: the higher the score, the worse the depressive symptoms.
Changes from baseline to visits at 6 and 12 months.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Improvement of global functioning
Changes from baseline to visits at 6 and 12 months.
Detection of Childhood life traumatic events
Childhood. It is administered only during the baseline visit.
Detection of traumatic events in the last year
The last year. It is administered only during the baseline visit.
Making a PTSD diagnosis
Changes from baseline to visits at 6 and 12 months.
Assessment of the severity of trauma-related symptoms.
The previous 7 days. Changes from baseline to visits at 6 and 12 months.
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EMDR Therapy
EXPERIMENTALEMDR: 20 individual sessions 60 minutes each for 6 months
Treatment as Usual
OTHERThe TAU condition includes follow-up visits with the psychiatry, psychology and with the nursing service. Visits with the psychiatrist consist to evaluate clinical status and readjust the pharmacological treatment if necessary while visits with the psychologist consist to assess and detect risk situations and to prevent relapses using a cognitive behavioral approach. Finally, the nursing service will provide health and care habits and will carry out the abstinence controls.
Interventions
The EMDR SUD Protocol consists of a detailed interview with respect to traumatic events, the treatment of those with the EMDR standard protocol and a further specific protocol for SUD that is focused on the concept of addiction memory.
The TAU condition includes follow-up visits with the psychiatry, psychology and with the nursing service. Visits with the psychiatrist consist to evaluate clinical status and readjust the pharmacological treatment if necessary while visits with the psychologist consist to assess and detect risk situations and to prevent relapses using a cognitive behavioral approach. Finally, the nursing service will provide health and care habits and will carry out the abstinence controls.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- age between 18 and 65 years
- outpatients
- presence of one or more traumatic events, which causes currently trauma associated symptoms (Scale of the impact of the event-reviewed, IES-R\> 0) and subjective Disability Unit (SUD)\>5)
You may not qualify if:
- presence of organic brain diseases
- presence of suicidal ideas
- having received a trauma focused therapy in the last 2 years
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Germanas Hospitalarias Benito Menni
Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08830, Spain
Parc de Salut Mar
Barcelona, 08019, Spain
Related Publications (16)
Driessen M, Schulte S, Luedecke C, Schaefer I, Sutmann F, Ohlmeier M, Kemper U, Koesters G, Chodzinski C, Schneider U, Broese T, Dette C, Havemann-Reinecke U; TRAUMAB-Study Group. Trauma and PTSD in patients with alcohol, drug, or dual dependence: a multi-center study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008 Mar;32(3):481-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00591.x. Epub 2008 Jan 22.
PMID: 18215214BACKGROUNDMauritz MW, Goossens PJ, Draijer N, van Achterberg T. Prevalence of interpersonal trauma exposure and trauma-related disorders in severe mental illness. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2013;4. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v4i0.19985. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
PMID: 23577228BACKGROUNDGradus JL. Prevalence and prognosis of stress disorders: a review of the epidemiologic literature. Clin Epidemiol. 2017 May 3;9:251-260. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S106250. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28496365BACKGROUNDKok T, de Haan H, van der Meer M, Najavits L, de Jong C. Assessing traumatic experiences in screening for PTSD in substance use disorder patients: what is the gain in addition to PTSD symptoms? Psychiatry Res. 2015 Mar 30;226(1):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.01.014. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
PMID: 25687377BACKGROUNDNovo P, Landin-Romero R, Radua J, Vicens V, Fernandez I, Garcia F, Pomarol-Clotet E, McKenna PJ, Shapiro F, Amann BL. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy in subsyndromal bipolar patients with a history of traumatic events: a randomized, controlled pilot-study. Psychiatry Res. 2014 Sep 30;219(1):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.05.012. Epub 2014 May 15.
PMID: 24880581BACKGROUNDShapiro F. The role of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in medicine: addressing the psychological and physical symptoms stemming from adverse life experiences. Perm J. 2014 Winter;18(1):71-7. doi: 10.7812/TPP/13-098.
PMID: 24626074BACKGROUNDNovo Navarro P, Landin-Romero R, Guardiola-Wanden-Berghe R, Moreno-Alcazar A, Valiente-Gomez A, Lupo W, Garcia F, Fernandez I, Perez V, Amann BL. 25 years of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR): The EMDR therapy protocol, hypotheses of its mechanism of action and a systematic review of its efficacy in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed). 2018 Apr-Jun;11(2):101-114. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2015.12.002. Epub 2016 Feb 11. English, Spanish.
PMID: 26877093BACKGROUNDHase M, Balmaceda UM, Hase A, Lehnung M, Tumani V, Huchzermeier C, Hofmann A. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in the treatment of depression: a matched pairs study in an inpatient setting. Brain Behav. 2015 Jun;5(6):e00342. doi: 10.1002/brb3.342. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
PMID: 26085967BACKGROUNDBehnammoghadam M, Alamdari AK, Behnammoghadam A, Darban F. Effect of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) on Depression in Patients With Myocardial Infarction (MI). Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Apr 19;7(6):258-62. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n6p258.
PMID: 26153191BACKGROUNDFeske U, Goldstein AJ. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing treatment for panic disorder: a controlled outcome and partial dismantling study. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1997 Dec;65(6):1026-35. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.65.6.1026.
PMID: 9420364BACKGROUNDDoering S, Ohlmeier MC, de Jongh A, Hofmann A, Bisping V. Efficacy of a trauma-focused treatment approach for dental phobia: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Oral Sci. 2013 Dec;121(6):584-93. doi: 10.1111/eos.12090. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
PMID: 24206075BACKGROUNDNazari H, Momeni N, Jariani M, Tarrahi MJ. Comparison of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing with citalopram in treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2011 Nov;15(4):270-4. doi: 10.3109/13651501.2011.590210. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
PMID: 22122001BACKGROUNDGerhardt A, Leisner S, Hartmann M, Janke S, Seidler GH, Eich W, Tesarz J. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing vs. Treatment-as-Usual for Non-Specific Chronic Back Pain Patients with Psychological Trauma: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Front Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 20;7:201. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00201. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 28066274BACKGROUNDPerez-Dandieu B, Tapia G. Treating Trauma in Addiction with EMDR: A Pilot Study. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014 Oct-Dec;46(4):303-9. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2014.921744.
PMID: 25188700BACKGROUNDTirado-Munoz J, Gilchrist G, Fischer G, Taylor A, Moskalewicz J, Giammarchi C, Kochl B, Munro A, Dabrowska K, Shaw A, Di Furia L, Leeb I, Hopf C, Torrens M. Psychiatric comorbidity and intimate partner violence among women who inject drugs in Europe: a cross-sectional study. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018 Jun;21(3):259-269. doi: 10.1007/s00737-017-0800-3. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
PMID: 29230558RESULTValiente-Gomez A, Moreno-Alcazar A, Radua J, Hogg B, Blanco L, Lupo W, Perez V, Robles-Martinez M, Torrens M, Amann BL. A Multicenter Phase II Rater-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Effectiveness of Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing Therapy vs. Treatment as Usual in Patients With Substance Use Disorder and History of Psychological Trauma: A Study Design and Protocol. Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 15;10:108. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00108. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 30930801DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Benedikt L Amann, PhD, MD
Parc de Salut Mar
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 4, 2018
First Posted
May 7, 2018
Study Start
September 1, 2018
Primary Completion
November 1, 2022
Study Completion
November 1, 2022
Last Updated
March 31, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-03