Study Stopped
Merged IRB study created
A Pilot Study of mDOT for Immunosuppressant Adherence in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients
A Pilot Study of Mobile Directly Observed Therapy (mDOT) for Immunosuppressant Adherence in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The investigators are interested in whether or not the use of a mobile health (mHealth) application increases the rate of immunosuppressant medication adherence among adult liver transplant recipients. The investigators aim to test this by randomly assigning transplant recipients to the intervention (use of an mHealth app to manage and track their immunosuppression regimen) or control arm (standard of care) upon discharge from their initial transplant hospitalization, and tracking medication adherence over time. The study population will be approximately 50 adult liver transplant recipients at the Johns Hopkins Hospital.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jun 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 29, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 12, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 12, 2020
CompletedSeptember 23, 2021
August 1, 2021
5 months
April 23, 2018
September 17, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
12-week immunosuppression medication adherence
After 12 weeks in the study, patients will complete the 4-item immunosuppressant therapy adherence instrument (ITAS) to determine self-reported medication adherence (scores range from 0-12 with 0 indicating very poor adherence and 12 indicating perfect adherence). Additionally, immunosuppression level trends will be tracked via electronic medical record review to determine medication adherence.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Feasibility of using the mHealth Application as Assessed by a Semi-Structured Interview and a 17-Item Survey
12 weeks
Alcohol Craving Assessment
12 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Standard of Care
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants in the control arm will be instructed to take their immunosuppressant medications as prescribed and attend required follow-up as is standard of care, and will not receive the mHealth application.
mHealth Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the intervention arm will receive the mHealth app either while they are an inpatient post-transplant, or at their first post-transplant clinic visit. Study personnel will assist participants assigned to the mHealth intervention arm with downloading the application and explain its functioning. Participants will then use the application to aid in immunosuppressant medication adherence post-transplant.
Interventions
The mHealth application will allow liver transplant recipients to see their medication regimen, record a video of themselves taking every dose, report side effects or symptoms, visualize their treatment progress, and access educational content. This information is encrypted and transmitted to a HIPAA-secure web portal for providers to review.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Greater than or equal to 22 years of age
- Receive a liver transplant at Johns Hopkins Hospital
You may not qualify if:
- Non-English speaking liver transplant recipients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Related Publications (12)
Mor E, Gonwa TA, Husberg BS, Goldstein RM, Klintmalm GB. Late-onset acute rejection in orthotopic liver transplantation--associated risk factors and outcome. Transplantation. 1992 Nov;54(5):821-4. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199211000-00010.
PMID: 1279849BACKGROUNDO'Carroll RE, McGregor LM, Swanson V, Masterton G, Hayes PC. Adherence to medication after liver transplantation in Scotland: a pilot study. Liver Transpl. 2006 Dec;12(12):1862-8. doi: 10.1002/lt.20828.
PMID: 16773637BACKGROUNDStilley CS, DiMartini AF, de Vera ME, Flynn WB, King J, Sereika S, Tarter RE, Dew MA, Rathnamala G. Individual and environmental correlates and predictors of early adherence and outcomes after liver transplantation. Prog Transplant. 2010 Mar;20(1):58-66; quiz 67. doi: 10.1177/152692481002000110.
PMID: 20397348BACKGROUNDPinsky BW, Takemoto SK, Lentine KL, Burroughs TE, Schnitzler MA, Salvalaggio PR. Transplant outcomes and economic costs associated with patient noncompliance to immunosuppression. Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9(11):2597-606. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02798.x.
PMID: 19843035BACKGROUNDBurra P, Germani G, Gnoato F, Lazzaro S, Russo FP, Cillo U, Senzolo M. Adherence in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2011 Jul;17(7):760-70. doi: 10.1002/lt.22294.
PMID: 21384527BACKGROUNDLaederach-Hofmann K, Bunzel B. Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients: a literature review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2000 Nov-Dec;22(6):412-24. doi: 10.1016/s0163-8343(00)00098-0.
PMID: 11072057BACKGROUNDHathaway DK, Combs C, De Geest S, Stergachis A, Moore LW. Patient compliance in transplantation: a report on the perceptions of transplant clinicians. Transplant Proc. 1999 Jun;31(4A):10S-13S. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(99)00113-x. No abstract available.
PMID: 10372033BACKGROUNDDobbels F, Vanhaecke J, Desmyttere A, Dupont L, Nevens F, De Geest S. Prevalence and correlates of self-reported pretransplant nonadherence with medication in heart, liver, and lung transplant candidates. Transplantation. 2005 Jun 15;79(11):1588-95. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000158430.06507.87.
PMID: 15940050BACKGROUNDNahid P, Dorman SE, Alipanah N, Barry PM, Brozek JL, Cattamanchi A, Chaisson LH, Chaisson RE, Daley CL, Grzemska M, Higashi JM, Ho CS, Hopewell PC, Keshavjee SA, Lienhardt C, Menzies R, Merrifield C, Narita M, O'Brien R, Peloquin CA, Raftery A, Saukkonen J, Schaaf HS, Sotgiu G, Starke JR, Migliori GB, Vernon A. Executive Summary: Official American Thoracic Society/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Infectious Diseases Society of America Clinical Practice Guidelines: Treatment of Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Oct 1;63(7):853-67. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw566.
PMID: 27621353BACKGROUNDChisholm MA, Lance CE, Williamson GM, Mulloy LL. Development and validation of the immunosuppressant therapy adherence instrument (ITAS). Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Oct;59(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.09.003.
PMID: 16198214BACKGROUNDSingleton, E.G., Tiffany, S.T. & Henningfield, J.E. (2000). Alcohol Craving Questionnaire (ACQ-NOW): Background, Scoring, and Administration (Manual). Baltimore, MD: Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
BACKGROUNDMellon L, Doyle F, Hickey A, Ward KD, de Freitas DG, McCormick PA, O'Connell O, Conlon P. Interventions for increasing immunosuppressant medication adherence in solid organ transplant recipients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 12;9(9):CD012854. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012854.pub2.
PMID: 36094829DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Macey Henderson, JD, PhD
Johns Hopkins University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Andrew Cameron, MD, PhD
Johns Hopkins University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Patients will be aware of which arm they are randomized to; thus, the study will not be blinded to practitioners or patients. However, study personnel performing data analysis will receive de-identified data that does not explicitly describe which group is intervention and which is control, but simply the code without a key. Only the PI and necessary personnel performing data extraction will have the key for the code to minimize bias in data analysis.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2018
First Posted
May 3, 2018
Study Start
June 29, 2020
Primary Completion
November 12, 2020
Study Completion
November 12, 2020
Last Updated
September 23, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share