Comparative Study Between Unillateral and Bilateral Lumbopelvic Fixation for Spinopelvic Dissociation
1 other identifier
observational
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Lumbopelvic fixation is the treatment opation for spinopelvic dissociation. In our study we will compare unilateral versus bilateral lumbopelvic fixation as regarding functional outcomes by Majeed score along a period of 12vmonths as a primary measure and metal failure,skin condition and nonunion as secondaries.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jun 2019
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 16, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2020
CompletedMarch 7, 2019
March 1, 2019
1 year
April 16, 2018
March 5, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Functional outcomes by Majeed score
Functional outcomes by Majeed score in group of patient with spinopelvic dissociation fixed by unilateral triangular osteosynthesis and comparing them with group of patient fixed by bilateral triangular osteosynthesis.
Along a period of 12 monthes.
Interventions
unilateral and bilateral lumbopelvic fixation for spinopelvic dissociation
Eligibility Criteria
Skeletally mature and neurologically free patient
You may qualify if:
- injury severity score \<22
- neurologically free patient
You may not qualify if:
- injury severity score \>22
- patient with neurological injury
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (3)
Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T. Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Feb;227:67-81.
PMID: 3338224BACKGROUNDRoy-Camille R, Saillant G, Gagna G, Mazel C. Transverse fracture of the upper sacrum. Suicidal jumper's fracture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1985 Nov;10(9):838-45. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198511000-00011.
PMID: 4089659BACKGROUNDGibbons KJ, Soloniuk DS, Razack N. Neurological injury and patterns of sacral fractures. J Neurosurg. 1990 Jun;72(6):889-93. doi: 10.3171/jns.1990.72.6.0889.
PMID: 2338573BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Mahmoud Badran, lectature
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 16, 2018
First Posted
May 3, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 1, 2020
Study Completion
July 1, 2020
Last Updated
March 7, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-03