Cognitive Stimulation in the Elderly: Individual Intervention on Cognitive Frailty
ECOG_CS
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Cognitive Stimulation (CS) in the elderly, as a group intervention, shows benefits on the cognition and quality of life of people with neurocognitive disorder (NCD)(ie, dementia). The evidence of cognitive stimulation as an individualized intervention, conducted at home, by the caregiver is limited. The main objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the Individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy program - "Making a Difference 3 - individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy (MD3), its acceptability and applicability by the dyad (people with NCD and their caregiver) in the Portuguese population. To achieve this purpose a pilot study will be conducted (randomized control trial), with two moments of evaluation - before the intervention of individual cognitive stimulation and after the intervention in both groups (Group 1 - group subject to intervention: individual cognitive stimulation program called "MD3"; Group 2 - group subject to usual care).The investigators intend to know the effect of the program on cognitive domains, quality of life and relationship between caregiver and care recipient. And, as well as understand the acceptability and applicability of the program by participants (dyad).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2018
CompletedMay 7, 2018
May 1, 2018
1.2 years
April 20, 2018
May 2, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from Baseline in the elderly participant's Cognition
Outcome Measure - Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (Rosen et al., 1984).
Post-intervention assessment (week 13)
Change from Baseline in the elderly participant's Quality of Life
Outcome Measure - Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease (Logsdon et al., 2002).
Post-intervention assessment (week 13)
Change from Baseline in the caregiver's overall health
Outcome Measure - Short Form-12 Health Survey (Ware et al., 1996).
Post-intervention assessment (week 13)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Change from Baseline in the elderly participant's Neuropsychiatric Symptoms
Post-intervention assessment (week 13)
Change from Baseline in the elderly participant's Functional Capacity
Post-intervention assessment (week 13)
Change from Baseline in the elderly participant's Depressive Symptoms
Post-intervention assessment (week 13)
Change from Baseline in the dyad's (elderly participant and caregiver) Quality of the Relationship
Post-intervention assessment (week 13)
Study Arms (2)
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONThe control group shall participate in the usual home-based care provided by their carer.
Individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe experimental group shall participate in the Making a Difference 3 program (Yates et al., 2015) is aimed at elderly people with mild or major neurocognitive disorder, where informal caregiver (family, friend or neighbour) assume a partnering role in an one-to-one approach. The program is composed by a range of stimulating activities (sessions), each with two levels of difficulty. The carers are introduced to a set of key principles that guides them during individual cognitive stimulation sessions, tailoring the interventions to the needs and reality of the elderly participants.
Interventions
This program unfolds in 3 weekly sessions of 30 minutes, for 12 weeks, thus completing a total of 36 sessions. Over the 3 months, the dyad will need to be monitored for orientation / monitoring of intervention by an element of the research team. This monitoring will be bi-weekly, in person or by phone - here according to the choice of the dyad). After each session the caregiver has a questionnaire to complete (intervention monitoring strategy), with the objective of evaluating the acceptability and applicability of the program.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Elderly person with 60 years of age or older;
- Diagnosis of mild or major neurocognitive disorder, performed by a physician specialized in neurology or psychiatry, or who is validated by the family physician in accordance with DSMIII/IV/5 or ICD-9/10 criteria;
- Presence of mild to moderate cognitive impairment according to the 6-Item Cognitive Decline Test (6CIT);
- Capable of communicating and understanding communication;
- Without a physical illness or significant disability (eg elderly people who are on dialysis or bedridden);
- Living in the community (in their home);
- Have an informal caregiver available and able to develop the individual cognitive stimulation program.
You may not qualify if:
- Elderly / informal caregiver with a history of severe psychiatric illness diagnosed before 60 years of age;
- Informal caregiver with cognitive impairment, even if mild (mild PNC according to DSM-5 criteria);
- Elderly people who do not live in their home.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Health Sciences Research Unit: Nursing
Coimbra, 3000-232, Portugal
Related Publications (14)
Brooke P, Bullock R. Validation of a 6 item cognitive impairment test with a view to primary care usage. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999 Nov;14(11):936-40.
PMID: 10556864BACKGROUNDYates, L.; Orrel M., Phoung, L.; Spector, O.; Woods, B.; Orgeta V. Making a Difference 3 - Individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy: A manual for carers. London: The Journal of Dementia Care : Hawker Publications; 2015. 160 p.
BACKGROUNDSpruytte N, Van Audenhove C, Lammertyn F, Storms G. The quality of the caregiving relationship in informal care for older adults with dementia and chronic psychiatric patients. Psychol Psychother. 2002 Sep;75(Pt 3):295-311. doi: 10.1348/147608302320365208.
PMID: 12396755BACKGROUNDOrgeta V, Leung P, Yates L, Kang S, Hoare Z, Henderson C, Whitaker C, Burns A, Knapp M, Leroi I, Moniz-Cook ED, Pearson S, Simpson S, Spector A, Roberts S, Russell IT, de Waal H, Woods RT, Orrell M. Individual cognitive stimulation therapy for dementia: a clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Health Technol Assess. 2015 Aug;19(64):1-108. doi: 10.3310/hta19640.
PMID: 26292178BACKGROUNDOrrell M, Yates LA, Burns A, Russell I, Woods RT, Hoare Z, Moniz-Cook E, Henderson C, Knapp M, Spector A, Orgeta V. Individual Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for dementia (iCST): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012 Sep 22;13:172. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-172.
PMID: 22998983BACKGROUNDQuayhagen, M. & Quayhagen, M. (2001). Testing of a cognitive stimulation intervention for dementia caregiving dyads. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 11(3), 319-332. http://doi.org/10.1080/09602010042000024
BACKGROUNDQuayhagen MP, Quayhagen M, Corbeil RR, Hendrix RC, Jackson JE, Snyder L, Bower D. Coping with dementia: evaluation of four nonpharmacologic interventions. Int Psychogeriatr. 2000 Jun;12(2):249-65. doi: 10.1017/s1041610200006360.
PMID: 10937544BACKGROUNDRosen WG, Mohs RC, Davis KL. A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1984 Nov;141(11):1356-64. doi: 10.1176/ajp.141.11.1356.
PMID: 6496779BACKGROUNDLogsdon RG, Gibbons LE, McCurry SM, Teri L. Assessing quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment. Psychosom Med. 2002 May-Jun;64(3):510-9. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200205000-00016.
PMID: 12021425BACKGROUNDWare J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
PMID: 8628042BACKGROUNDCummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994 Dec;44(12):2308-14. doi: 10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308.
PMID: 7991117BACKGROUNDMAHONEY FI, BARTHEL DW. FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5. No abstract available.
PMID: 14258950BACKGROUNDSheikh, J. I., & Yesavage, J. A. (1986). Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical Gerontologist, 5, 165-173.
BACKGROUNDSilva R, Bobrowicz-Campos E, Santos-Costa P, Cruz AR, Apostolo J. A Home-Based Individual Cognitive Stimulation Program for Older Adults With Cognitive Impairment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 22;12:741955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.741955. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34880809DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The randomization process it will be done in https://www.random.org/ by an independent person.
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Ph.D, Coordinator Professo
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2018
First Posted
May 2, 2018
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2018
Study Completion
June 30, 2018
Last Updated
May 7, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share