Effects of a Standardized Post-coercion Review Session.
1 other identifier
interventional
109
1 country
6
Brief Summary
The present study aims at exploring the impact of a standardized post-coercion review session of coercive measures that took place in the psychiatric inpatient setting in reducing the use of coercive measures and the subjective perception of coercion. It is well known that coercive measures have a major negative impact on the health, well-being and the course of treatment of patients suffering from mental health issues. Many interventions have been implemented in the last years to reduce the use of coercion and limit its consequences. The investigators developed a standardized post-coercion review intervention. This session takes place as soon as possible after the concerned coercive measure and is moderated by a member of staff who has not been involved in the use of coercion. Other persons involved are the patient, a staff member who took the decision leading to the use of the coercive measure, and a one of the patient's relatives. Hypothesis is that the use of this standardized intervention can reduce the use of subsequent coercive measures and level of perceived coercion, prevent the development of post-traumatic symptoms, help preserving a trustful therapeutic relationship and positively change the attitude of staff regarding the use of coercion. This intervention has been proven to be well accepted by patients and staff members in a previous pilot study. The present study is designed as a randomised-controlled study investigating the effect of post-coercion review.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2017
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2019
CompletedApril 22, 2020
April 1, 2020
1.6 years
January 30, 2018
April 20, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Objective coercive measures
Number of coercive measures (seclusion, restraint, forced medication)
At the time of discharge from the hospital by every included patient, up to 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Subjective experience of coercion (1)
At the time of discharge from the hospital by every included patient, up to 6 months
Subjective experience of coercion (2)
At the time of discharge from the hospital by every included patient, up to 6 months
Subjective experience of coercion (3)
At the time of discharge from the hospital by every included patient, up to 6 months
Quality of the therapeutic relationship
At the time of discharge from the hospital by every included patient, up to 6 months
Post-traumatic symptoms (1)
At the time of discharge from the hospital by every included patient, up to 6 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standardized post-coercion review
EXPERIMENTALIntervention: Standardized post-coercion review session. Patients allocated to this arm receive a standardized post-coercion review of the coercive measure they experienced using the developed guidelines.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONPatients allocated to this arm are treated following usual standards and routine. This might include some form of post-coercion review that doesn't follow the developed standardized guidelines.
Interventions
Debriefing session following the developed guidelines including setting and themes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Inpatient
- Subject to coercive measure (seclusion, restraint, forced medication)
- Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder (ICD-10: F1x.5, F2x, F31.x).
- Written and informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Hospital stay \< 24h
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (6)
Psychiatrische Universitätsklink der Charité - SHK
Mitte, State of Berlin, 10115, Germany
Vivantes Klinikum am Urban
Berlin, 10967, Germany
Vivantes Wenckebach-Klinikum
Berlin, 12099, Germany
Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln
Berlin, 12351, Germany
Alexianer Krankenhaus Hedwigshöhe
Berlin, 12526, Germany
St. Joseph Krankenhaus Weißensee
Berlin, 13088, Germany
Related Publications (1)
Wullschleger A, Vandamme A, Mielau J, Renner L, Bermpohl F, Heinz A, Montag C, Mahler L. Effect of standardized post-coercion review session on symptoms of PTSD: results from a randomized controlled trial. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Sep;271(6):1077-1087. doi: 10.1007/s00406-020-01215-x. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
PMID: 33231771DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
PD Dr. med. Montag
Charité
- STUDY CHAIR
Dr. med. Mahler
Charité
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr. med. Wullschleger
Charité
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 30, 2018
First Posted
May 1, 2018
Study Start
November 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 31, 2019
Study Completion
June 30, 2019
Last Updated
April 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-04