Alleviating Carbohydrate-Counting Burden in T1DM Using Artificial Pancreas and Empagliflozin
CLASS15
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
3
Brief Summary
One of the challenges in the design of the artificial pancreas (AP) is preventing postprandial hyperglycemia. Beyond algorithmic solutions, one countermeasure to postprandial hyperglycemia that may enhance performance of the AP is the use of adjunctive-to-insulin medications such as those in the Sodium Glucose-Linked Transporter 2 inhibitor class. This study evaluates whether use of oral empagliflozin on the background of single-hormone AP can improve postprandial blood glucose control. The investigators will test this hypothesis in a cross-over trial design by comparing open-label empagliflozin versus placebo in the setting of AP on separate study days that involve carbohydrate counting, simple meal announcement and no meal announcement strategies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2018
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 24, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 21, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 21, 2019
CompletedJune 24, 2021
June 1, 2021
1.5 years
January 24, 2018
June 23, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of mean glucose levels between artificial pancreas (AP) with empagliflozin with no-meal announcement meal approach strategy and AP without empagliflozin with carb-counting meal approach strategy.
Non-inferiority comparison of mean 14-hour glucose level obtained by continuous glucose monitoring between i) the AP with empagliflozin with no meal-announcement and ii) the AP with quantitative carbohydrate-counting without empagliflozin.
After completing 5 meal interventions (3-9 weeks)
Comparison of mean glucose levels between AP with empagliflozin with simple meal announcement strategy and AP without empagliflozin with carb-counting.
If there is a significant difference in the previous non-inferiority comparison, the following conditional primary comparison will be conducted: Non-inferiority comparison of mean 14-hour sensor glucose level obtained by continuous glucose monitoring between i) the AP with empagliflozin with simple meal-announcement and ii) the AP with quantitative carbohydrate-counting without empagliflozin.
After completing 5 meal interventions (3-9 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Time spent in hypoglycemia
After completing 5 meal interventions (3-9 weeks)
Number of hypoglycemic events below 3.3 mmol/L
After completing 5 meal interventions (3-9 weeks)
Number of clinically remarkable hypoglycemic events
After completing 5 meal interventions (3-9 weeks)
Number of treated hypoglycemic events
After completing 5 meal interventions (3-9 weeks)
Mean continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) glucose level
After completing 5 meal interventions (3-9 weeks)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Main arm
EXPERIMENTALSingle arm open-label cross-over study with random order of SGLT-2 inhibitor intervention (Empagliflozin 25mg po qd), in which each cross-over phase includes different meal strategies (carbohydrate counting, meal announcement, no meal announcement) on separate days in the setting of single hormone artificial pancreas
Interventions
Individuals will test insulin dosing during different meal strategies (carbohydrate counting, plain meal announcement, no meal announcement) in a setting of the single hormone artificial pancreas with or without SGLT2 inhibitor (empagliflozin) addition. After starting the empagliflozin therapy, there will be 1-2 weeks long therapy optimization period and afterwards meal strategies will be administered. Randomization will be used to determine whether participant will start meal strategies on empagliflozin or without empagliflozin, cross-over design enables all participants to undergo all combination of approaches.
Single hormone artificial pancreas will be used as a baseline background intervention standardizing the delivery and dosing of insulin. Artificial pancreas (insulin pump, continuous glucose monitoring device and dosing-suggestion algorithm) will be used by all participants on days when meal strategy intervention will be performed.
Participants will use different approaches (strategies) to insulin dose estimation for ingested carbohydrates on study days. Goal of these various strategies is to recognize magnitude of empagliflozin effect in situations when artificial pancreas algorithm is working with information of different accuracy. Individual meal approach strategies include carbohydrate counting, meal size announcement and no meal announcement. The exception will be combination of no empagliflozin and no meal announcement, which didn't result in sufficient glucose control in previous trials therefore will not be repeated in a current trial. Meal approach strategies will occur on separate days- 5 days in total each day using one meal strategy for all meals during the day.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes for at least one year.
- Use of insulin pump therapy for at least 3 months.
- HbA1c ≤ 10%.
- Women of childbearing potential must agree to use adequate birth control during participation in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Clinically significant nephropathy, neuropathy or retinopathy.
- Recent acute macrovascular event e.g. acute coronary syndrome or cardiac surgery.
- History of pheochromocytoma or insulinoma
- Use of loop diuretics, anticholinergic drugs, beta-blockers at high dose, glucocorticoids (except low stable dose and inhaled steroids), chronic acetaminophen treatment, chronic warfarin treatment
- Use of non-insulin adjunct anti-hyperglycaemic drug (e.g. metformin, glucagon-like peptide analogues, etc.).
- Ongoing or planned pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Recent severe hypoglycemic episode prior to enrollment
- Recent diabetic ketoacidosis prior to enrollment
- Recent history of genital or urinary infection prior to enrollment
- History of lower limb amputation and recent history of leg or foot infection or wound
- Anticipating a significant change in exercise regimen between initiations of two intervention blocks (i.e. starting or stopping an organized sport).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Sinai Health System
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3L9, Canada
Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, H2W 1R7, Canada
McGill University Health Center
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 2B4, Canada
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Bruce A. Perkins, MD
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, TGRI
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 24, 2018
First Posted
April 27, 2018
Study Start
May 15, 2018
Primary Completion
November 21, 2019
Study Completion
November 21, 2019
Last Updated
June 24, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share