Pretarsal Versus Preseptal Botulinum Toxin for Patients With Eyelid Spasm
2 other identifiers
interventional
100
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
A triple-masked placebo-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of pretarsal versus preseptal botulinum toxin for patients with eyelid spasm. The investigators hypothesize injection of botulinum toxin into the pretarsal orbicularis oculi muscle will have greater clinical efficacy, better measured quality of life, fewer complications, and better cost effectiveness in comparison to a preseptal pattern of injection.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Jul 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_4
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 20, 2019
CompletedApril 26, 2019
April 1, 2019
2.3 years
March 18, 2018
April 25, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS)
The severity of the patient's spasm employing the widely used JRS scale. The JRS is scored between 0 and 4 (0 = no spasm, 1 = mild, barely noticeable, 2 = mild, without functional impairment, 3 = moderate spasm, moderate functional impairment, 4 = severe incapacitating spasm). The JRS will be scored independently by two graders from a video clip of approximately 30-60 seconds in duration. Differences between the 2 scores will be arbitrated by a third reviewer.
The videos will be taken at the clinical activity visits (C1 and C2) will be scheduled for months 4 and 10. The primary outcome measure will consist of the change from C1 to C2.
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Toronto (TWSTRS)
C1 and C2 will take place at months 4 and 10.
Blepharospasm Disability Index (BSDI)
C1 and C2 will take place at months 4 and 10.
Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24)
C1 and C2 will take place at months 4 and 10.
Global Assessment Scale (GAS)
C1 and C2 will take place at months 4 and 10.
Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain
Measured at each injection visit (months 0, 3, 6, and 9).
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Preseptal-pretarsal
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Preseptal-pretarsal group will receive injections of Botulinum Toxin Type A 100Unit/Vial (Product) in the preseptal site (Injection pattern A) and Saline Solution for Injection (placebo control) in the pretarsal site for 2 cycles at 3 months apart. Both groups will crossover and receive the alternative intervention. Hence in the second half of the trial, the Preseptal-pretarsal group will be injected with BtA in Pattern B and Pretarsal-preseptal group will receive Pattern A.
Pretarsal-preseptal
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe Pretarsal-preseptal group will initially receive injections Botulinum Toxin Type A 100Unit/Vial (Product) in the reverse with the intervention at the pretarsal site (Injection pattern B) for 2 cycles at 3 months apart. Groups 1 and 2 will crossover and receive the alternative intervention. Both groups will crossover and receive the alternative intervention. Hence in the second half of the trial, the Preseptal-pretarsal group will be injected with BtA in Pattern B and Pretarsal-preseptal group will receive Pattern A.
Interventions
Botulinum Toxin Type A 100Unit/Vial (Product) comes as a dry powder and is routinely reconstituted with Saline Solution for Injection
The placebo consists of vehicle only. Saline Solution for Injection is the vehicle substance normally used to reconstitute Botulinum Toxin Type A (see 1st Intervention above).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 18 years-of-age
- Clinical diagnosis eyelid dystonia, consisting of either blepharospasm or hemifacial spasm
- Patient wish to have treatment with botulinum toxin type A (BtA).
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to express their symptoms or history to the extent that they are not able to complete the study questionnaires, such as those suffering from dementia.
- Existence of potential contraindications to BtA treatment:
- Pregnancy
- Breastfeeding
- Prior allergic reaction
- Active infection or inflammation in the treatment area
- Neuromuscular and peripheral neuropathic disease
- Concomitant aminoglycoside therapy
- Patients with poor or unstable general health with activities of daily living severely affected by non-dystonia confounding factors, such as hospitalized or bed bound patients.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Hong Konglead
- Food and Health Bureau, Hong Kongcollaborator
Related Publications (23)
Jankovic J. Blepharospasm with basal ganglia lesions. Arch Neurol. 1986 Sep;43(9):866-8. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1986.00520090006004. No abstract available.
PMID: 3741202BACKGROUNDDutton JJ, Fowler AM. Botulinum toxin in ophthalmology. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan-Feb;52(1):13-31. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.10.003.
PMID: 17212988BACKGROUNDCzyz CN, Burns JA, Petrie TP, Watkins JR, Cahill KV, Foster JA. Long-term botulinum toxin treatment of benign essential blepharospasm, hemifacial spasm, and Meige syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013 Jul;156(1):173-177.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
PMID: 23541393BACKGROUNDHarrison AR, Erickson JP, Anderson JS, Lee MS. Pain relief in patients receiving periocular botulinum toxin A. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Mar-Apr;24(2):113-6. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e31816386e1.
PMID: 18356715BACKGROUNDHilker R, Schischniaschvili M, Ghaemi M, Jacobs A, Rudolf J. Health related quality of life is improved by botulinum neurotoxin type A in long term treated patients with focal dystonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;71(2):193-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.71.2.193.
PMID: 11459891BACKGROUNDMuller J, Wissel J, Kemmler G, Voller B, Bodner T, Schneider A, Wenning GK, Poewe W. Craniocervical dystonia questionnaire (CDQ-24): development and validation of a disease-specific quality of life instrument. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 May;75(5):749-53. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.013441.
PMID: 15090572BACKGROUNDHall TA, McGwin G Jr, Searcey K, Xie A, Hupp SL, Owsley C, Kline LB. Health-related quality of life and psychosocial characteristics of patients with benign essential blepharospasm. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Jan;124(1):116-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.1.116.
PMID: 16401794BACKGROUNDJankovic J, Schwartz K, Donovan DT. Botulinum toxin treatment of cranial-cervical dystonia, spasmodic dysphonia, other focal dystonias and hemifacial spasm. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1990 Aug;53(8):633-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.53.8.633.
PMID: 2213039BACKGROUNDThenganatt MA, Fahn S. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of movement disorders. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2012 Aug;12(4):399-409. doi: 10.1007/s11910-012-0286-3.
PMID: 22661378BACKGROUNDHuang W, Foster JA, Rogachefsky AS. Pharmacology of botulinum toxin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Aug;43(2 Pt 1):249-59. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2000.105567.
PMID: 10906647BACKGROUNDHarrison AR. Chemodenervation for facial dystonias and wrinkles. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2003 Oct;14(5):241-5. doi: 10.1097/00055735-200310000-00003.
PMID: 14502050BACKGROUNDCosta J, Espirito-Santo C, Borges A, Ferreira JJ, Coelho M, Moore P, Sampaio C. Botulinum toxin type A therapy for blepharospasm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;(1):CD004900. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004900.pub2.
PMID: 15674969BACKGROUNDAramideh M, Ongerboer de Visser BW, Brans JW, Koelman JH, Speelman JD. Pretarsal application of botulinum toxin for treatment of blepharospasm. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995 Sep;59(3):309-11. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.59.3.309.
PMID: 7673963BACKGROUNDJankovic J. Pretarsal injection of botulinum toxin for blepharospasm and apraxia of eyelid opening. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 Jun;60(6):704. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.60.6.704. No abstract available.
PMID: 8648354BACKGROUNDAlbanese A, Bentivoglio AR, Colosimo C, Galardi G, Maderna L, Tonali P. Pretarsal injections of botulinum toxin improve blepharospasm in previously unresponsive patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996 Jun;60(6):693-4. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.60.6.693-a. No abstract available.
PMID: 8648343BACKGROUNDCakmur R, Ozturk V, Uzunel F, Donmez B, Idiman F. Comparison of preseptal and pretarsal injections of botulinum toxin in the treatment of blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm. J Neurol. 2002 Jan;249(1):64-8. doi: 10.1007/pl00007849.
PMID: 11954870BACKGROUNDAlbanese A, Sorbo FD, Comella C, Jinnah HA, Mink JW, Post B, Vidailhet M, Volkmann J, Warner TT, Leentjens AF, Martinez-Martin P, Stebbins GT, Goetz CG, Schrag A. Dystonia rating scales: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2013 Jun 15;28(7):874-83. doi: 10.1002/mds.25579.
PMID: 23893443BACKGROUNDWabbels B, Jost WH, Roggenkamper P. Difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2011 Jun;118(6):925-43. doi: 10.1007/s00702-010-0546-9. Epub 2011 Jan 9.
PMID: 21221669BACKGROUNDWabbels B, Roggenkamper P. Botulinum toxin in hemifacial spasm: the challenge to assess the effect of treatment. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2012 Aug;119(8):963-80. doi: 10.1007/s00702-011-0762-y. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
PMID: 22231846BACKGROUNDSarifakioglu N, Sarifakioglu E. Evaluating effects of preservative-containing saline solution on pain perception during botulinum toxin type-a injections at different locations: a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005 Mar-Apr;29(2):113-5. doi: 10.1007/s00266-004-0062-0. Epub 2005 Apr 14.
PMID: 15815811BACKGROUNDJankovic J, Kenney C, Grafe S, Goertelmeyer R, Comes G. Relationship between various clinical outcome assessments in patients with blepharospasm. Mov Disord. 2009 Feb 15;24(3):407-13. doi: 10.1002/mds.22368.
PMID: 19053054BACKGROUNDMarcet MM, Lemke BN, Greenwald MJ, Fountain TR, Roth S, Dubovy SR. Eyelid eversion for visualisation of the upper eyelid lamellae: an anatomical cadaver study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011 Oct;95(10):1376-8. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300020. Epub 2011 Jul 11.
PMID: 21746734BACKGROUNDMarcet MM, Meyer DR, Greenwald MJ, Roth S, Selva D. Proximal tarsal attachments of the levator aponeurosis: implications for blepharoptosis repair. Ophthalmology. 2013 Sep;120(9):1924-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
PMID: 23601804BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marcus M Marcet, MD
The University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Honorary Clinical Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2018
First Posted
April 26, 2018
Study Start
July 1, 2015
Primary Completion
October 31, 2017
Study Completion
February 20, 2019
Last Updated
April 26, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share