NCT03505450

Brief Summary

This study will be nested as a randomized controlled trial within an online Delphi and will assess the effects of the population sampling compared to purposive sampling for consensus in an online Delphi.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
385

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 1, 2018

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 23, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 29, 2018

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2018

Completed
29 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 29, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

March 22, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

April 1, 2018

Last Update Submit

March 18, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

decision support tools,

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Delphi response rate differences as measured by % of completed questions between samples

    Full Delphi sample compared to a 10% randomized stratified sample taken from of the 5 stakeholder groups

    Up to 20 weeks or study completion

Study Arms (2)

Population sample

Other: Population Sample

Purposive Sample

Other: Purposive sample

Interventions

full sample of recruited participants

Population sample

purposive sample of recruited participants

Purposive Sample

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Healthy adults from an online cohort who are invited to come to consensus in an online Delphi

You may qualify if:

  • Protocol lab online trials Delphi (PLOT-D) Participant

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

ThinkWell

Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX4 4DN, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Brookes ST, Chalmers KA, Avery KNL, Coulman K, Blazeby JM; ROMIO study group. Impact of question order on prioritisation of outcomes in the development of a core outcome set: a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Jan 25;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2405-6.

    PMID: 29370827BACKGROUND
  • Sinha IP, Smyth RL, Williamson PR. Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 25;8(1):e1000393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393.

    PMID: 21283604BACKGROUND
  • Fletcher AJ, Marchildon GP. Using the Delphi Method for Qualitative, Participatory Action Research in Health Leadership. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2014;13:1-18

    BACKGROUND
  • Brice A, Price A, Burls A. Creating a database of internet-based clinical trials to support a public-led research programme: A descriptive analysis. Digit Health. 2015 Nov 20;1:2055207615617854. doi: 10.1177/2055207615617854. eCollection 2015 Jan-Dec.

    PMID: 29942546BACKGROUND
  • Bagley HJ, Short H, Harman NL, Hickey HR, Gamble CL, Woolfall K, Young B, Williamson PR. A patient and public involvement (PPI) toolkit for meaningful and flexible involvement in clinical trials - a work in progress. Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Apr 27;2:15. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0029-8. eCollection 2016.

    PMID: 29062516BACKGROUND
  • Price A, Albarqouni L, Kirkpatrick J, Clarke M, Liew SM, Roberts N, Burls A. Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: An overview of systematic reviews. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):240-253. doi: 10.1111/jep.12805. Epub 2017 Oct 27.

    PMID: 29076631BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Consumer Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Officials

  • Amy Price, PhD

    University of Oxford

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2018

First Posted

April 23, 2018

Study Start

May 29, 2018

Primary Completion

September 30, 2018

Study Completion

October 29, 2018

Last Updated

March 22, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Aggregated data available by request from the study investigator

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
Time Frame
Post-publication for 5 years
Access Criteria
Contact study investigator by email

Locations