Wireless Handheld 8-lead ECG Device Performance in Heart Patients (Rapid Rhythm)
Performance Evaluation Study of a Six Electrode (8 Lead) Wireless Handheld ECG Recording Device With Four Lead Chest Extension Versus Conventional 12-lead ECG in Heart Patients
2 other identifiers
interventional
271
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is designed to compare the performance of both 6 and 10 electrode ECGs from the handheld device with the conventional 12 lead ECG. As well as comparing the detection of atrial fibrillation, the study will also compare the detection of other heart problems and of normal heart rhythm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation
Started Jan 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2019
CompletedFebruary 5, 2025
February 1, 2025
2.4 years
April 9, 2018
February 3, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Capabilities of an 8 lead ECG system (Rapid Rhythm) - normal ECGs
The percentage of ECGs where a normal control ECG is matched by a normal RR ECG.
18 months
Capabilities of an 8 lead ECG system (Rapid Rhythm) - abnormal ECGs
The percentage of ECGs where abnormalities of the control ECG are matched by similar abnormalities of the RR ECG.
18 months
Study Arms (1)
Rapid Rhythm Handheld 8-lead ECG Device
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will have measurements taken with the 8 lead ECG system, which will be compared to the conventional standard care 12 lead ECG.
Interventions
We want to explore whether using 6 electrodes on the chest (as in the Rapid Rhythm Handheld 8-lead ECG device) can give the same diagnostic result to the standard 10 electrode (12-lead) ECG, which uses 6 chest electrodes plus 4 electrodes on the arms and legs. To do this we need to compare measurements taken with the 6 electrode (8 lead) study device to those taken with the gold-standard 10 electrode (12 lead) method. We want to find out whether the new equipment can detect the same heart rhythms as the standard method, so that ECG measurements might be made more quickly and easily in the future.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patient attending an adult cardiology or anti-coagulation clinic appointment, at clinics at Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (including the Manchester Heart Centre).
- Patients on cardiac wards 3 and 4.
- Aged 18 years or above.
- Male or Female.
You may not qualify if:
- Aged less than 18 years.
- Unable to give informed consent.
- Does not wish to participate in the study.
- Any patients with visible breaks to the skin, rashes or inflammation in the chest area on the day of the test
- Bedridden or otherwise unable to transfer between chair and bed for both seated and supine measurements
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trustlead
- Rapid Rhythm Ltdcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2018
First Posted
April 18, 2018
Study Start
January 24, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2019
Study Completion
June 30, 2019
Last Updated
February 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share