NCT03501836

Brief Summary

This study is designed to compare the performance of both 6 and 10 electrode ECGs from the handheld device with the conventional 12 lead ECG. As well as comparing the detection of atrial fibrillation, the study will also compare the detection of other heart problems and of normal heart rhythm.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
271

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable atrial-fibrillation

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 24, 2017

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 9, 2018

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2018

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

April 9, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 3, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Capabilities of an 8 lead ECG system (Rapid Rhythm) - normal ECGs

    The percentage of ECGs where a normal control ECG is matched by a normal RR ECG.

    18 months

  • Capabilities of an 8 lead ECG system (Rapid Rhythm) - abnormal ECGs

    The percentage of ECGs where abnormalities of the control ECG are matched by similar abnormalities of the RR ECG.

    18 months

Study Arms (1)

Rapid Rhythm Handheld 8-lead ECG Device

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will have measurements taken with the 8 lead ECG system, which will be compared to the conventional standard care 12 lead ECG.

Device: Rapid Rhythm Handheld 8-lead ECG Device

Interventions

We want to explore whether using 6 electrodes on the chest (as in the Rapid Rhythm Handheld 8-lead ECG device) can give the same diagnostic result to the standard 10 electrode (12-lead) ECG, which uses 6 chest electrodes plus 4 electrodes on the arms and legs. To do this we need to compare measurements taken with the 6 electrode (8 lead) study device to those taken with the gold-standard 10 electrode (12 lead) method. We want to find out whether the new equipment can detect the same heart rhythms as the standard method, so that ECG measurements might be made more quickly and easily in the future.

Rapid Rhythm Handheld 8-lead ECG Device

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient attending an adult cardiology or anti-coagulation clinic appointment, at clinics at Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (including the Manchester Heart Centre).
  • Patients on cardiac wards 3 and 4.
  • Aged 18 years or above.
  • Male or Female.

You may not qualify if:

  • Aged less than 18 years.
  • Unable to give informed consent.
  • Does not wish to participate in the study.
  • Any patients with visible breaks to the skin, rashes or inflammation in the chest area on the day of the test
  • Bedridden or otherwise unable to transfer between chair and bed for both seated and supine measurements

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial FibrillationHeart Murmurs

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsSigns and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 9, 2018

First Posted

April 18, 2018

Study Start

January 24, 2017

Primary Completion

June 30, 2019

Study Completion

June 30, 2019

Last Updated

February 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations