VATS Evacuation Compared to Reinsertion of Thoracostomy Tube in Persistent Traumatic Haemothorax
Video_ Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Evacuation Compared to Reinsertion of Thoracostomy Tube in Persistent Traumatic Haemothorax
1 other identifier
interventional
2
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is prospective, randomized study comparing VATS (video- Assisted Thoracoscopy) to reinsertion of a thoracostomy tube in patients with persistent traumatic haemothorax. The incidence varies and can be as high as 20%, but in most studies is found to be 1-4% after initial tube thoracostomy for chest trauma. The most accepted complication of retained hemothorax is empyema.Retained hemothorax treatment started by physiotherapy and early withdrawal of tube thoracostomy which lead to more complications as empyema, fibro thorax/entrapped lung, flail chest and diaphragmatic hernia. Early VATS is an alternative treatment for retained hemothorax with evidence that it is a superior intervention when compared to a second tube thoracostomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2018
CompletedJanuary 20, 2025
January 1, 2025
1.1 years
April 8, 2018
January 17, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of hospitalization
number of days spent
average 5-7 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
number of patients developed empyema
through one month
Study Arms (2)
VATS evacuation
EXPERIMENTALpatients selected for VATS after failure of first thoracostomy tube drainage
thoracostomy tube
EXPERIMENTALpatients selected for thoracostomy tube reinsertion after failure of drainage with first thoracostomy tube
Interventions
the patient will be randomized to a Video-Assisted thoracoscopy for retained haemothorax
the patient is randomized to reinsertion of a Thoracostomy Tube for retained haemothorax
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- We include for the study all patients admitted to Assiut university hospitals during the time of the study that proved persistent haemothorax that with criteria:
- Ages that are eligible for study are between 18years to 60 years (adult)
- Both genders will be included to study.
- Clinical and radiological diagnosis of persistent haemothorax.
- Thoracostomy tube blockage or failure to drain within 5-7days.
You may not qualify if:
- More than one thoracostomy tube drainage in the same attempt side.
- Unable to consent to trial.
- Coexisting pathology requiring other interventions.
- Patients that need urgent interventions (hemodynamically unstable, empyema and flail chest).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Assiut university
Asyut, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammed Khalil salama Ayyad, PHD
Assiut University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- resident
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2018
First Posted
April 18, 2018
Study Start
July 1, 2017
Primary Completion
July 30, 2018
Study Completion
July 30, 2018
Last Updated
January 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01