Medication Free Treatment: Characteristics, Justification and Outcome
1 other identifier
observational
183
1 country
2
Brief Summary
In 2015 the Norwegian government, after initiative from user organizations, decided to implement medication free inpatient treatment units. The goal is to secure real options to medication for psychiatric illness, and to gather experiences with medication free options. Freedom of choice is a main concern. The projects main aim is to study the outcome of medication free treatments of mental illness compared to treatment as usual, as well as characteristics of the treatment and the treatment population and why patients choose this treatment. Hereunder we aim to document who asks for these kinds of services and why, what kind of treatment they get, how they experience it, and how they respond to this kind of treatment. An important part will be to document whether the goal of increased freedom of choice between real treatment options is fulfilled. Research questions
- 1.Does medication free treatment differ from treatment as usual? Are there any unique characteristics of the patient group who asks for this kind of treatment? What kind of treatment do they receive during their stay? How do they experience this treatment in comparison to treatment as usual? How is this in relation to the goals about increased freedom of choice? Does use of medication change during and/or after medication free treatment?
- 2.Why do patients choose medication free treatment? What are their reasons? What experiences lead to this wish?
- 3.What is the outcome of medication free treatment compared to treatment as usual?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2018
Longer than P75 for all trials
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 23, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 14, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2023
CompletedAugust 29, 2022
August 1, 2022
4.9 years
March 23, 2018
August 26, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Outcome Questionnaire-45 (OQ-45)
This questionnaire was developed for tracking outpatients on a weekly basis. It measures symptom distress, interpersonal functioning and contentment with social role functioning, areas widely recognized as the essential ingredients of interest when assessing patient improvement. It is regarded suitable for patients with a wide range of diagnoses, sensitive to change over a short period of time, and brief and easy to administer (Lambert, Hansen, \& Finch, 2001).
Filled out by patients at start of treatment, 1 time every week during the treatment program (typically 2 to 8 weeks), 1 time at end of treatment (typically at week 2-8) and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (25)
The Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-SP)
Filled out by patients at start of treatment, 1 time every week during the treatment program (typically 2 to 8 weeks), 1 time at end of treatment (typically at week 2-8) and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ)
Filled out by patients at start of treatment, end of treatment (typically at week 2-8) and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery
Filled out by patients at start of treatment, end of treatment (typically at week 2-8) and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
CollaboRATE
Filled out by patients at start of treatment, end of treatment (typically at week 2-8) and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8 (CSQ-8)
Filled out by patients at start of treatment, end of treatment (typically at week 2-8) and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
- +20 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Patients in medication free treatment
Inpatient unit dedicated to medication free treatment. This is an inpatient treatment unit for voluntary, planned treatment. The unit is staffed for a patient group that can be managed within a regime of open doors, voluntary treatment and low supervision. This means that high suicidal risk, severe acting out, active drug abuse etc. is excluded. They have an 8 week treatment program including Illness managment an recovery (IMR), Feedback informed treatment (FIT) and Affect consciousness treatment (ABT).
Patients in treatment as Usual Åråsen
Inpatient unit colocated with the medication free unit. Same level of care. Similar treatment program, shorter treatment duration (on average 3 weeks).
Patients in treatment as Usual Myrvegen
Inpatient unit on a different location from the others. Same Level of care. Different treatment program. Intermediate treatment duration (mainly 4-6 weeks).
Interventions
Inpatient unit dedicated to medication free treatment. This is an inpatient treatment unit for voluntary, planned treatment. The unit is staffed for a patient group that can be managed within a regime of open doors, voluntary treatment and low supervision. This means that high suicidal risk, severe acting out, active drug abuse etc. is excluded. They have an 8 week treatment program including Illness managment an recovery (IMR), Feedback informed treatment (FIT) and Affect consciousness treatment (ABT).
Inpatient unit on a different location from the others. Same Level of care. Different treatment program. Intermediate treatment duration (mainly 4-6 weeks).
Unit colocated with the medication free unit. Similar treatment program. Short treatment duration (average 3 weeks).
Eligibility Criteria
Patient with mental illness in the regions Øvre and Nedre Romerike who receive medication free treatment or treatment as usual at the same level of care (planned, voluntary inpatient treatment at DPS døgn) within the period from spring 2018 and 1-2 years forward, who are able to fill out forms / be interviewed in Norwegian and concent to participate.
You may qualify if:
- Receiving planned treatment in the included treatment units
- Are able to fill out questionnaires in Norwegian with minimal help / be interviewed in norwegian
- Signed informed consent and willing to participate in the trial
You may not qualify if:
- Not able to fill out questionnaires or be interviewed in Norwegian.
- Beds dedicated acute crisis and usercontrolled beds
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University Hospital, Akershuslead
- University of Oslocollaborator
Study Sites (2)
DPS Øvre Romerike Døgn
Jessheim, 2050, Norway
DPS Nedre Romerike døgn
Lillestrøm, 2007, Norway
Related Publications (22)
Aksjon for medisinfrie tilbud. www.medisinfrietilbud.no. Retrieved from http://medisinfrietilbud.no
BACKGROUNDAustin PC. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011 May;46(3):399-424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
PMID: 21818162BACKGROUNDBenchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, Petersen I, Sorensen HT, von Elm E, Langan SM; RECORD Working Committee. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 6;12(10):e1001885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. eCollection 2015 Oct.
PMID: 26440803BACKGROUNDBentall, R. (2009). Doctoring the Mind. Why Psychiatric Treatments fail. London: Penguin Books.
BACKGROUNDForand, N. R., & DeRubeis, R. J. (2013). Combining medication and psychotherapyin the treatment of major mental disorders. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change (6. ed., pp. 735-775). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons inc.
BACKGROUNDGundersen, K. (2016). Medikamentfri psykiatri - eksperiment uten forskning. Aftenposten.
BACKGROUNDHelse Sør-Øst. (2016). Overordnet protokoll for medisinfri behandling innen psykisk helsevern.
BACKGROUNDHelsedirektoratet. (2009). Nasjonal retningslinje for diagnostisering og behandling av depresjon i primær- og spesialisthelsetjenesten. ( IS-1561).
BACKGROUNDHelsedirektoratet. (2012). Nasjonal faglig retningslinje for utgreiing og behandling av bipolare lidingar (IS-1925). Helsedirektoratet.
BACKGROUNDHelsedirektoratet. (2013). Nasjonal faglig retningslinje for utredning, behandling og oppfølging av personer med psykoselidelser ( IS-1957). Helsedirektoratet.
BACKGROUNDLambert, M. J. (2013). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin & Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6. ed., pp. 169-219). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & sons, inc.
BACKGROUNDMoncrieff, j. (2009). A straight talking Introduction to Psychiatric drugs. Herefordshire: PCCS Books.
BACKGROUNDRøssberg, j. i. (2016, 13.06.16). Det er langt fra sikkert at det riktige er å innføre medisinfritt behandlingstilbud. Aftenposten.
BACKGROUNDRøssberg, j. i., Andreassen, O. A., & Malt, U. (2016, 17.07.16). Medisinfrie tiltak for psykoselidelser er fortsatt et sjansespill. Aftenposten.
BACKGROUNDSohler N, Adams BG, Barnes DM, Cohen GH, Prins SJ, Schwartz S. Weighing the evidence for harm from long-term treatment with antipsychotic medications: A systematic review. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2016;86(5):477-85. doi: 10.1037/ort0000106. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
PMID: 26652608BACKGROUNDWampold, B. E. (2001). The Great Psychotherapy Debate. Models, Methods and Findings (2 ed.). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates publishers.
BACKGROUNDWampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The Great Psychotherapy Debate. The Evidence for what makes Psychotherapy work (2 ed.). New York, London: Routledge, Taylor &Francis Group.
BACKGROUNDWhitaker, R. (2010/2014 (no)). En psykiatrisk epidemi. Illusjoner om psykiatriske legemidler. Oslo: Abstract forlag.
BACKGROUNDWhitaker, R. (2016). The case against antipsychotics. A review of their long-term effect. Weblog: Mad in America
BACKGROUNDWunderink L, Nieboer RM, Wiersma D, Sytema S, Nienhuis FJ. Recovery in remitted first-episode psychosis at 7 years of follow-up of an early dose reduction/discontinuation or maintenance treatment strategy: long-term follow-up of a 2-year randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Sep;70(9):913-20. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.19.
PMID: 23824214BACKGROUNDStandal K, Solbakken OA, Saltyte Benth J, Abbass A, Heiervang KS. Are People Worse Off in a Mental Health Treatment Paradigm Where Medication Is Deemphasised? A Naturalistic Noninferiority Trial of an Initiative to Improve Patient Choice. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2025 Nov 23:207640251390930. doi: 10.1177/00207640251390930. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41277153DERIVEDStandal K, Solbakken OA, Rugkasa J, Halvorsen MS, Abbass A, Wirsching C, Brakstad IE, Heiervang KS. Medication-Free Treatment in Mental Health Care How Does It Differ from Traditional Treatment? Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Feb 3;18:315-335. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S435610. eCollection 2024.
PMID: 38327730DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kristin Heiervang, PhD
Akershus universitetssykehus
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 3 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Researcher Psychologist Phd
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 23, 2018
First Posted
April 17, 2018
Study Start
May 14, 2018
Primary Completion
April 1, 2023
Study Completion
April 1, 2023
Last Updated
August 29, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-08