Perineal Versus Rectal Approach for Prostate Biopsy to Prevent Iatrogenic Infections
PRAPI
1 other identifier
interventional
340
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Retrospective reports from literature have shown a lower rate of infections for transperineal versus transrectal approach for prostate biopsies in the setting of prostate cancer suspicion. The aim of this study would be to compare in a prospective randomized trial the rate of infection with transperineal versus transrectal approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable prostate-cancer
Started Apr 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 5, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2020
CompletedApril 12, 2018
April 1, 2018
2.1 years
April 5, 2018
April 5, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of post-biopsy infection from Baseline to four weeks after prostate biopsy
Urinary infection will be assessed based on urinanalysis : 10\^5 germs and 10\^4 leucocytes minimum)
Four weeks post-biopsy
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Presence of antibiotic resistant germ
One week, two weeks and four weeks post-biopsy
Presence of complication post-biopsy : hematuria, urinary retention, rectoragy, any other complication
One week, two weeks and four weeks post-biopsy
Study Arms (2)
Transperineal prostate biopsy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient will have a transperineal prostate biopsy.
Transrectal prostate biopsy
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatient will have a transrectal prostate biopsy.
Interventions
Puncture of 12 to 30 percutaneous prostate core biopsies through the perineum with a transrectal ultrasound probe guidance. The procedure would be performed with the Artemis (Eigen) device allowing topographic recording of the puncture and MRI / ultrasound image fusion in order to target the MRI suspected lesion.
Patient would undergo 12 to 30 transrectal prostate core biopsies through the rectum with a transrectal ultrasound probe guidance. The procedure would be performed with the Artemis (Eigen) device allowing topographic recording of the puncture and MRI / ultrasound image fusion in order to target the MRI suspected lesion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Indication of prostate biopsy
You may not qualify if:
- No indication of prostate biopsy
- Impossibility for prostate biopsy (e.g. major anal stenosis or history of anal amputation)
- Antibiotic treatment within three months before prostate biopsy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, 75014, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alexandre INGELS, MD
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2018
First Posted
April 12, 2018
Study Start
April 1, 2018
Primary Completion
May 1, 2020
Study Completion
May 1, 2020
Last Updated
April 12, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share