NCT03494556

Brief Summary

Decision aids such as the HEART Pathway, Emergency Department Assessment of Chest Pain Score (EDACS), Revised Geneva Score and PERC Score have similar ability to accurately risk stratify Emergency Department (ED) patients with possible Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) and Pulmonary Embolism (PE) and have become standard practice in the ED setting. This study seeks to determine whether prehospital use of these decision aids is feasible and determine which are the most sensitive and specific for prediction of ACS and PE, respectively.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
365

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 3, 2018

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 11, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 18, 2018

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 18, 2019

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 9, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

July 25, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

April 3, 2018

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Determine whether prehospital chest pain decision aid use is feasible.

    Paramedics and blinded Emergency Department providers will be complete four risk stratification tools on a convenience sample of patients with acute chest pain. Inter-rater reliability (kappa) will be determined for each tool.

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Compare decision aids to determine which are the most sensitive and specific

    30 days

Study Arms (1)

No Intervention

Paramedic will use data collected during routine care to complete four risk stratification tools.

Other: Data Collection

Interventions

Paramedic will use data collected during routine care to complete four risk stratification tools.

No Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients being transported to the Emergency Department by Cumberland or New Hanover County EMS.

You may qualify if:

  • Age greater than or equal to 21
  • Acute non-traumatic chest pain
  • Transported by Cumberland or New Hanover County EMS to a local Emergency Department

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with evidence of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on ECG
  • Inter-facility transports (transfers)
  • Patients with unstable vital signs
  • Prisoners
  • Non-english speakers

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Cape Fear Valley Mobile Integrated Healthcare Cumberland County EMS

Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304, United States

Location

New Hanover Regional Medical Center EMS

Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401, United States

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Owens PL, Barrett ML, Gibson TB, Andrews RM, Weinick RM, Mutter RL. Emergency department care in the United States: a profile of national data sources. Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Aug;56(2):150-65. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2009.11.022. Epub 2010 Jan 15.

    PMID: 20074834BACKGROUND
  • Lowthian JA, Cameron PA, Stoelwinder JU, Curtis A, Currell A, Cooke MW, McNeil JJ. Increasing utilisation of emergency ambulances. Aust Health Rev. 2011 Feb;35(1):63-9. doi: 10.1071/AH09866.

    PMID: 21367333BACKGROUND
  • Pittet V, Burnand B, Yersin B, Carron PN. Trends of pre-hospital emergency medical services activity over 10 years: a population-based registry analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 10;14:380. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-380.

    PMID: 25209450BACKGROUND
  • Saddichha S, Saxena MK. Is every chest pain a cardiac event? : an audit of patients with chest pain presenting to emergency services in India. Intern Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;4(3):235-9. doi: 10.1007/s11739-009-0246-3. Epub 2009 Apr 15.

    PMID: 19367468BACKGROUND
  • Burman RA, Zakariassen E, Hunskaar S. Acute chest pain - a prospective population based study of contacts to Norwegian emergency medical communication centres. BMC Emerg Med. 2011 Jul 21;11:9. doi: 10.1186/1471-227X-11-9.

    PMID: 21777448BACKGROUND
  • Mahler SA, Miller CD, Hollander JE, Nagurney JT, Birkhahn R, Singer AJ, Shapiro NI, Glynn T, Nowak R, Safdar B, Peberdy M, Counselman FL, Chandra A, Kosowsky J, Neuenschwander J, Schrock JW, Plantholt S, Diercks DB, Peacock WF. Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):795-802. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

    PMID: 23117012BACKGROUND
  • Mahler SA, Riley RF, Hiestand BC, Russell GB, Hoekstra JW, Lefebvre CW, Nicks BA, Cline DM, Askew KL, Elliott SB, Herrington DM, Burke GL, Miller CD. The HEART Pathway randomized trial: identifying emergency department patients with acute chest pain for early discharge. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Mar;8(2):195-203. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001384. Epub 2015 Mar 3.

    PMID: 25737484BACKGROUND
  • Thang ND, Sundstrom BW, Karlsson T, Herlitz J, Karlson BW. ECG signs of acute myocardial ischemia in the prehospital setting of a suspected acute coronary syndrome and its association with outcomes. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;32(6):601-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

    PMID: 24731933BACKGROUND
  • Mahler SA, Hiestand BC, Goff DC Jr, Hoekstra JW, Miller CD. Can the HEART score safely reduce stress testing and cardiac imaging in patients at low risk for major adverse cardiac events? Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2011 Sep;10(3):128-33. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3182315a85.

    PMID: 21989033BACKGROUND
  • Flaws D, Than M, Scheuermeyer FX, Christenson J, Boychuk B, Greenslade JH, Aldous S, Hammett CJ, Parsonage WA, Deely JM, Pickering JW, Cullen L. External validation of the emergency department assessment of chest pain score accelerated diagnostic pathway (EDACS-ADP). Emerg Med J. 2016 Sep;33(9):618-25. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-205028. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

    PMID: 27406833BACKGROUND
  • Than M, Flaws D, Sanders S, Doust J, Glasziou P, Kline J, Aldous S, Troughton R, Reid C, Parsonage WA, Frampton C, Greenslade JH, Deely JM, Hess E, Sadiq AB, Singleton R, Shopland R, Vercoe L, Woolhouse-Williams M, Ardagh M, Bossuyt P, Bannister L, Cullen L. Development and validation of the Emergency Department Assessment of Chest pain Score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocol. Emerg Med Australas. 2014 Feb;26(1):34-44. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12164. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

    PMID: 24428678BACKGROUND
  • Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, Sanchez O, Aujesky D, Bounameaux H, Perrier A. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Feb 7;144(3):165-71. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-3-200602070-00004.

    PMID: 16461960BACKGROUND
  • Kline JA, Mitchell AM, Kabrhel C, Richman PB, Courtney DM. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost. 2004 Aug;2(8):1247-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.00790.x.

    PMID: 15304025BACKGROUND
  • Havas S. The ACCORD Trial and control of blood glucose level in type 2 diabetes mellitus: time to challenge conventional wisdom. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Jan 26;169(2):150-4. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.518. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19171811BACKGROUND
  • Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction; Katus HA, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasche P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2012 Oct 16;126(16):2020-35. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31826e1058. Epub 2012 Aug 24. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22923432BACKGROUND
  • Pollack CV, Schreiber D, Goldhaber SZ, Slattery D, Fanikos J, O'Neil BJ, Thompson JR, Hiestand B, Briese BA, Pendleton RC, Miller CD, Kline JA. Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: initial report of EMPEROR (Multicenter Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism in the Real World Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 8;57(6):700-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.071.

    PMID: 21292129BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary SyndromePulmonary Embolism

Interventions

Data Collection

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Myocardial IschemiaHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesVascular DiseasesLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesEmbolismEmbolism and Thrombosis

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • Jason Stopyra, MD

    Wake Forest University Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
30 Days
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 3, 2018

First Posted

April 11, 2018

Study Start

April 18, 2018

Primary Completion

February 18, 2019

Study Completion

September 9, 2020

Last Updated

July 25, 2023

Record last verified: 2019-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

At this time, the study does not have plans to share individual participant data, including data dictionaries, with other researchers.

Locations