Post-chemotherapy Symptom Management SMART
2 other identifiers
interventional
498
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Survivors of solid tumors (N=451) who completed curative intent chemotherapy for a solid tumor within the past 2 years were interviewed at baseline and stratified as high or low need for symptom management based on comorbidity and depressive symptoms. High need survivors were randomized initially to the 12-week Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMSH, N=282) or 12-week SMSH Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIPC, N=93) added during weeks 1-8. After 4 weeks of the SMSH alone, non-responders on depression were re-randomized to continue with SMSH alone (N=30) or add TIPC (N=31).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable cancer
Started Jul 2018
Longer than P75 for not_applicable cancer
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 30, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 11, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 3, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 3, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 19, 2023
CompletedOctober 19, 2023
September 1, 2023
3.9 years
March 30, 2018
August 8, 2023
September 25, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Symptom Severity Index- Comparison of Two Groups Created by First Randomization
Symptoms were measured using the modified General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) allowing for a quick assessment of 18 symptoms: fatigue, sleep difficulties, pain, headache, difficulty concentrating, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, numbness or tingling, skin rashes or sores, swelling, weakness, shortness of breath, cough, depression, and anxiety. Respondents indicated the severity of each symptom (0 = not present to 10 = worst possible). A summed symptom severity index for 17 symptoms other than depression was averaged over weeks 1-13 from each weekly contact, baseline, and 13-week interviews. Potential range 0-170, with higher score indicating worse outcome (greater severity). Because the collection of symptoms does not form a scale, internal consistency reliability was not applicable.
Weeks 1-13
Symptom Severity Index- Comparison of Two Groups Created by Second Randomization
Symptoms were measured using the modified General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) allowing for a quick assessment of 18 symptoms: fatigue, sleep difficulties, pain, headache, difficulty concentrating, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, numbness or tingling, skin rashes or sores, swelling, weakness, shortness of breath, cough, depression, and anxiety. Respondents indicated severity of each symptom (0 = not present to 10 = worst possible). A summed symptom severity index for 17 symptoms other than depression was averaged over weeks 5-13 from each weekly contact, baseline, and 13-week interviews. Potential range 0-170, higher value reflect worse outcome (greater symptom severity). Because the collection of symptoms does not form a scale, internal consistency reliability was not applicable.
Weeks 5-13
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Depressive Symptoms- Comparison of Two Groups Created by First Randomization.
Week 13
Depressive Symptoms - Comparison of Two Groups Created by Second Randomization
Week 13
Study Arms (3)
Low Need Benchmark or Follow-up
NO INTERVENTIONIn the low need benchmark or follow-up group, survivors completed detailed baseline and 13-week assessments (about 30-40 minutes) over the telephone. A brief assessment (about 5 minutes) at week 4 over the telephone was used to assess symptoms.
High Need A: Start with SMSH alone for 4 weeks
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were mailed the printed Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMH). The Group A participant was called every week for 4 weeks to ask about symptoms and suggest strategies from the SMH to relieve symptoms. After 4 weeks, participants were re-randomized to continue in SMH for 8 more weeks or to add Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIPC) Intervention for the subsequent 8 weeks. If the TIPC was added, the counselor called the participant once per week for about 35-40 minutes to assess and discuss interpersonal relationships, communication, social support, managing symptoms and survivorship. At week 13, the participant completed the second assessment.
High Need B: Start with SMSH+TIPC
EXPERIMENTALParticipants were called every week for the first 8 weeks using a combination of TIP-C and SMH. The counselor called to assess and discuss interpersonal relationships, communication, social support, managing symptoms and survivorship. At the end of 8 weeks, the final 4 calls followed the SMSH alone protocol. At week 13, the second assessment was conducted.
Interventions
See arm/group descriptions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Survivors must have a new diagnosis or localized recurrence of solid tumor cancer
- Be finishing curative intent adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation, and do not have any subsequent cancer treatments planned, except for radiation therapy, hormonal therapy or trastuzumab for breast cancer.
- years of age or older
- Have access to a telephone
- Understand English or Spanish
- Are not currently receiving counseling and/or psychotherapy
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder in medical record verified by the recruiter
- Nursing home resident
- Bedridden
- Currently receiving counseling and/or psychotherapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Arizonalead
- Michigan State Universitycollaborator
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Cancer Center at St. Joseph's
Phoenix, Arizona, 85004, United States
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona, 85721, United States
Related Publications (1)
Sikorskii A, Badger T, Segrin C, Crane TE, Chalasani P, Arslan W, Hadeed M, Morrill KE, Given C. A Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial of Symptom Management After Chemotherapy. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Jun;65(6):541-552.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
PMID: 36801353RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Limitations and Caveats
The larger than anticipated proportion of high need survivors resulted in a larger sample size for tests of hypotheses associated with first randomization. The higher than anticipated response rate to the SMSH at week 4 resulted in a lower number of survivors in the second randomization compared to the requirements of power analysis. On the other hand, a higher than anticipated rate of response to the SMSH alone led to a larger than planned number of responders.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Terry Badger, PhD (MPI) and Alla Sikorskii, PhD (MPI)
- Organization
- University of Arizona College of Nursing
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Terry Badger, PhD
University of Arizona
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Data collectors will be blinded to the arm of the study.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 30, 2018
First Posted
April 11, 2018
Study Start
July 1, 2018
Primary Completion
June 3, 2022
Study Completion
June 3, 2022
Last Updated
October 19, 2023
Results First Posted
October 19, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Anticipate later part of 2022
- Access Criteria
- Data Sharing Data from this study will be available to other researchers under the following conditions: 1) appropriate human subjects protection is in place; 2) data have been de-identified; and 3) study investigators have publicly presented and published key findings. Data and safety monitoring plan is described under Human Subjects.
We will share the findings and data with other researchers, the public, and key stakeholders based on the principles that NIH has articulated regarding the sharing of study results and resources. The University of Arizona agrees that data sharing is essential for expedited translation of research results into knowledge, products, and procedures to improve health. Sharing of study results Manuscript based on results from the proposed study will be published in peer-reviewed journals. We will select "open access" options for these manuscripts whenever possible. Data Sharing Data from this study will be available to other researchers under the following conditions: 1) appropriate human subjects protection is in place; 2) data have been de-identified; and 3) study investigators have publicly presented and published key findings. Data and safety monitoring plan is described under Human Subjects.