NCT03488069

Brief Summary

Sedation is one of the most common practices applied in intensive care units (ICU) and the management of sedation, analgesia and delirium is a quality measure in ICUs. Several intensive care societies published guidelines regarding the use of sedatives and analgesics recently. In literature there are many survey studies investigating practices of sedation in ICUs of different countries, but knowledge of the sedation practices of intensive care physicians in Turkey is lacking. The aim of this study was to provide a baseline knowledge on this matter and to establish some points to be improved. An electronic survey form, consisting of 34 questions was generated with google forms, posted to 1700 email addresses and 429 returned (25%). The survey included questions about demographics and choices and routines of sedation, analgesia, neuromuscular blockers and delirium administration. Ninety-six percent of the respondents indicated that they practiced sedation in their ICUs and mechanical ventilation was checked as the primary indication (94%). On the question regarding drug choices for sedation, midazolam was the most preferred agent (90%). About pain questions, the most used evaluation tool was visual analogue scale (69.0%) and 83% of the respondents preferred to use tramadol for pain, followed by paracetamol (81.6%). Of the participants, 50.5% indicated that they routinely evaluated delirium and 56% of them used confussion assessment method for ICU. The awareness of 2013 American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) guideline for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium was only 38%. The results of this survey have indicated some areas to be improved, such as low incidence of written sedation protocols, frequent use of benzodiazepines, and delirium screening. A national guideline should be prepared taking pain, agitation, and delirium in focus.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
429

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2017

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 2, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2017

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 28, 2018

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 4, 2018

Completed
Last Updated

April 9, 2018

Status Verified

April 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

March 28, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 5, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

critical caresedationpracticesurvey

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Practices and preferences of sedation

    Collection of answers to the survey

    3 months

Interventions

SurveyOTHER

Submission of survey answers

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All intensive care physicians that are the member of Turkish Society of Intensive Care

You may qualify if:

  • All physicians accepting to participate the survey

You may not qualify if:

  • None

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical School

Istanbul, 34098, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Urkmez S, Erdogan E, Utku T, Dikmen Y. Sedation Practices and Preferences of Turkish Intensive Care Physicians: A National Survey. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019 Jun;47(3):220-227. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2019.49799. Epub 2019 Feb 24.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Critical Illness

Interventions

Surveys and Questionnaires

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Data CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public Health

Study Officials

  • seval urkmez, MD

    IU, Cerrahpasa Medical School, Dept of Intensive Care

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2018

First Posted

April 4, 2018

Study Start

August 2, 2017

Primary Completion

November 1, 2017

Study Completion

November 1, 2017

Last Updated

April 9, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-04

Locations