NCT03486405

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effectiveness of telehealth via video feedback to transition rear foot strike runners to non-heel strike runner following a lower extremity injury. Telehealth re-education gait training is much cheaper than in-clinic retraining sessions with a medical provider and could be much more widely used by both consumers and researchers as a training aid, a way to help alter running form, prevent running injuries and be used as a tool for use in the rehabilitation of running related injuries.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2018

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 7, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 3, 2018

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 4, 2018

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 15, 2019

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 15, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

May 20, 2019

Status Verified

May 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

February 7, 2018

Last Update Submit

May 17, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Foot Strike Pattern

    Analyzed through slow motion camera on an instrumented treadmill.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Perceived running pain

    6 months

  • Perceived running effort

    6 months

  • Perceived effort of running

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Intervention group

EXPERIMENTAL

The experimental group will have no in person education by researchers. All education and running modification will be performed via video. Education on running form, a home exercise program, and a 4 week return to run program will be provided to the subjects through e-mail. They will also receive the same in person video analysis performed at weeks 0 (initial), 10 and 6 months to assess running kinematics.

Other: Intervention group

Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group will have the same 4 week return to run program, home exercise program, and video analysis performed at weeks 0 (initial), 10 and 6 months to assess running kinematics.

Other: Control group

Interventions

Control group runners will receive the same graduated return to run intervals and 4-week home exercise program. However, they will receive no video education during the initial 10 weeks.

Control group

Runners randomized to the intervention group will receive additional video tele-health instruction on how to transition to a non-rearfoot strike (NRFS) running pattern. Runners in the intervention group will have additional tele-health follow-ups at weeks 1, 2, 4,6, 8, and 10 using a tele-conferencing program and the Hudl Technique application. At each tele-health video follow-up participants will be emailed a questionnaire assessing their progress and function. At month 6 a final data collection session to include video analysis will be performed.

Intervention group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 55 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Pain free walking 2 miles in 35 minutes
  • Weight bearing dorsiflexion (WBDF) Range of Motion (ROM) 80% symmetry
  • unassisted single leg heel raises
  • Recovering from a lower-extremity injury

You may not qualify if:

  • History of previous stress fracture / fracture of the foot
  • Participant who already uses a non-rearfoot strike running pattern
  • Participant is pregnant

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Keller Army Community Hospital

West Point, New York, 10996, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Knee Injuries

Interventions

Control Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Leg InjuriesWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: This study will be a randomized control trial crossover design.
Sponsor Type
FED
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Major, United States Air Force

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2018

First Posted

April 3, 2018

Study Start

October 4, 2018

Primary Completion

May 15, 2019

Study Completion

May 15, 2019

Last Updated

May 20, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The principal investigator will keep your research records. These records may be looked at by staff from the Keller Army Community Hospital Department of Clinical Investigation, the Keller Army Community Hospital (KACH) Institutional Review Board (IRB), the Army Clinical Investigation Regulatory Office (CIRO), the Department of Defense (DoD) Higher Level Review, and other government agencies as part of their duties. These duties include making sure that the research participants are protected. Your research records may be disclosed outside of the hospital, but in this case, you will be identified only by a unique code number. Information about the code will be kept in a secure location and access limited to authorized research study personnel. This research study meets the confidentiality requirements of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

Locations