Adjuncts to IVRA, a Comparison Between Ketorolac and Paracetamol
Adjuncts to Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia, a Comparison Between Ketorolac and Paracetamol
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study was planned to compare the effect of ketorolac 20 mg to 300 mg of paracetamol when added to lidocaine 3 mg/kg for Intravenous regional anaesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 postoperative-pain
Started Mar 2018
Typical duration for phase_3 postoperative-pain
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 21, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 2, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 20, 2019
CompletedJuly 24, 2020
March 1, 2018
1.1 years
March 21, 2018
July 22, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The time to first analgesic request.
The time from tourniquet release until first patient request for analgesic
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (2)
sensory block
1 year
motor block
1 year
Study Arms (3)
Lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALPatients in group C will receive 3 mg/kg of lidocaine 2% diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 ml.
Lidocaine+ Ketorolac
EXPERIMENTALPatients in group K receive 3 mg/kg of lidocaine 2% + 20 mg ketorolac diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 ml.
Lidocaine+Paracetamol
EXPERIMENTALPatients in group P will receive 3 mg/kg of lidocaine 2% + 300 mg paracetamol diluted with saline to a total volume of 40 ml.
Interventions
Two cannulae were placed, one in a vein on the dorsum of the operative hand and the other on the non operative hand for i.v fluids. The operative arm was elevated for 2 min and was then exsanguinated with an elastic bandage. A pneumatic tourniquet was then placed around the upper arm, and the cuff was inflated to 100 mm Hg above systolic BP. Circulatory isolation of the arm was verified by inspection, absence of a radial pulse, and a loss of the pulse oximetry tracing in the ipsilateral index fingers The solutions were prepared by an anesthesiology assistant not involved in any part of the study. The solutions were injected over 90 s by an anaesthesiologist.
Two cannulae were placed, one in a vein on the dorsum of the operative hand and the other on the non operative hand for i.v fluids. The operative arm was elevated for 2 min and was then exsanguinated with an elastic bandage. A pneumatic tourniquet was then placed around the upper arm, and the cuff was inflated to 100 mm Hg above systolic BP. Circulatory isolation of the arm was verified by inspection, absence of a radial pulse, and a loss of the pulse oximetry tracing in the ipsilateral index fingers The solutions were prepared by an anesthesiology assistant not involved in any part of the study. The solutions were injected over 90 s by an anaesthesiologist.
Two cannulae were placed, one in a vein on the dorsum of the operative hand and the other on the non operative hand for i.v fluids. The operative arm was elevated for 2 min and was then exsanguinated with an elastic bandage. A pneumatic tourniquet was then placed around the upper arm, and the cuff was inflated to 100 mm Hg above systolic BP. Circulatory isolation of the arm was verified by inspection, absence of a radial pulse, and a loss of the pulse oximetry tracing in the ipsilateral index fingers The solutions were prepared by an anesthesiology assistant not involved in any part of the study. The solutions were injected over 90 s by an anaesthesiologist.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II, who will be scheduled for surgery of the hand or the forearm were included in this study after informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Severe Raynaud's Disease
- Sickle Cell Disease
- Crush injury to the limb
- A history of allergic reaction to lidocaine
- Liver disease or kidney disease
- Significant cardiovascular disease
- Highly nervous and uncooperative patients
- Patient with history of opioid dependence
- Drug or alcohol abuse
- Psychiatric disorder
- Neurological diseases
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Omar Ali
Asyut, 71515, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Khaled Abdel-Baki Abdel-Rahman, Lecturer of anaesthesia
Assiut University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident doctor at the department of anaesthesiology and ICU
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2018
First Posted
April 2, 2018
Study Start
March 21, 2018
Primary Completion
April 28, 2019
Study Completion
August 20, 2019
Last Updated
July 24, 2020
Record last verified: 2018-03