Incomes of Nutritional Support Modalities in Hemodialysis Patients With Severe Malnutrition
Positive Incomes of Nutritional Support Modalities in Terms of Nutritional Status and Inflammation in Hemodialysis Patients With Severe Malnutrition
1 other identifier
observational
56
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Introduction: Protein energy malnutrition is one of the strongest predictors of morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Many reports indicate that there is a high prevalence of malnutrition up to 40% , and has a strong association with inflammation and cardiovascular disease (CVD) as well as lower quality of life in this population. The aim of this study was to compare the nutritional modalities by means of biochemical parameters, arterial stiffness and bioimpedance analysis. Material and Methods: We designed an observational study with 56 malnourished MHD patients (mean age: 61.8±12.3 years, duration of hemodialysis: 7.9±5.1 years) . Patients were distributed into 4 groups according to patients requests for nutritional support modalities. We offered the combination of oral nutritional support (ONS) and intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN) to all patients however some of the patients refused this combination thus we had 4 groups as; Group 1 (patients received only ONS and refused parenteral nutrition; n: 14), group 2 (patients received only parenteral NS and refused ONS; n: 14), group 3 (patients received both oral and parenteral NS; n: 10) and group 4 (dietetic support group; patients who refused all types of nutritional support and only followed by counselling, n: 18) for 12 months. Biochemical parameters were assessed from monthly clinical visits. Normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR), malnutrition-inflammation score (MIS), body composition (fat mass \[FM\], fat-free mass (FFM) muscle mass (MM, body mass index (BMI)) by multifrequency bioimpedance analysis (BCM, Fresenius).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jan 2016
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2018
CompletedApril 3, 2018
March 1, 2018
11 months
March 24, 2018
March 31, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Inflammation
C-reactive protein
12 months
Study Arms (4)
1;Oral nutritional support (ONS)
patients ongoing hemodialysis who received only oral nutritional support (Nutrena) and refused intradialytic parenteral nutrition; n: 14
2; Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition
patients ongoing hemodialysis who received only Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition (Kabiven central) and refused parenteral nutrition; n: 14
group 3; combination group
patients ongoing hemodialysis received both ONS and Intradialytic Parenteral Nutrition NS; n: 10
group 4; dietetic support group;
patients ongoing hemodialysis who refused all types of nutritional support and only followed by counselling, n: 18
Interventions
Patients in group 1 and 3 take ONS 200 ml/day twice a day at home. Patients in group 2 and 3 received IDPN administrations. \]. Its infusion was started 30 minutes after initiation of HD via the venous port of the bubble trap on the HD tubing and continued throughout the entire HD procedure at a rate of 150 ml/h for 30 min and consisted of 300 ml for 3 hour.
Patients in group 2 and 3 received IDPN administrations Its infusion was started 30 minutes after initiation of HD via the venous port of the bubble trap on the HD tubing and continued throughout the entire HD procedure at a rate of 150 ml/h for 30 min and consisted of 300 ml for 3 hour.
Eligibility Criteria
Among 712 MHD patients, 138 who were diagnosed as severely malnourished were followed up between January 2016 - December 2016. Eigthy-two patients were excluded according to above criteria thus 56 severely malnourished patients data was included to the study and are recomended to receive ONS and/or IDPN. The given supplementation is continued until the nutritional parameters are ameliorated. The patients choice was the determinator of the received nutritional support.
You may qualify if:
- subjective global assessment (SGA) scores B or C
- serum albumin concentration \<3.5 g/dL
- loss of ≥5% dry weight (DW) over the past 3 months )
You may not qualify if:
- active infectious disease,
- chronic inflammatory systemic diseases (CIDs) like rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus
- multiple sclerosis
- malabsorption syndrome
- inadequate dialysis (single pool Kt/V \< 1.4)
- recent surgery within 3 months or during follow-up;
- hospitalization at time of randomization
- nephrotic syndrome
- active malignancy or history of malignancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2018
First Posted
March 30, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
December 1, 2016
Last Updated
April 3, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03