Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: A Department of Defense Funded Multicenter Pilot Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
65
1 country
6
Brief Summary
Postoperative pain is usually treated with opioids that have undesirable and sometimes dangerous side effects (e.g., vomiting and respiratory depression)-and yet over 80% of patients still experience inadequate pain relief. A novel, non-pharmacologic analgesic technique-percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS)- holds extraordinary potential to greatly reduce or obviate opioid requirements and concurrently improve analgesia following painful surgery. This technique involves inserting an insulated electric lead adjacent to a target nerve through a needle prior to surgery using ultrasound guidance. Following surgery, a tiny electric current is delivered to the nerve resulting in potent pain control without any cognitive or adverse systemic side effects whatsoever. The electrical pulse generator (stimulator) is so small it is simply affixed to the patient's skin. The leads are already cleared by the US Food and Drug Administration to treat acute (postoperative) pain for up to 60 days; and, since percutaneous PNS may be provided on an outpatient basis, the technique holds the promise of providing potent analgesia outlasting the pain of surgery-in other words, the possibility of a painless, opioid-free recovery following surgery. The current project is a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm clinical pilot study to (1) determine the feasibility and optimize the protocol of a planned definitive clinical trial; and (2) estimate the treatment effect of percutaneous PNS on pain and opioid consumption following moderate-to-severely painful ambulatory surgery compared with usual and customary opioid-based analgesia. This will allow determination of the required sample size for a subsequent definitive multicenter clinical trial. Combined, the pilot study and definitive trial have a strong potential to dramatically reduce or obviate postoperative opioid requirements and their resultant negative effects on both individuals and society; while concurrently improving analgesia, increasing the ability to function in daily life, decreasing the risk of transition from acute to chronic pain, and improving quality of life.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2018
Typical duration for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 15, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 14, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 11, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 7, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 18, 2021
CompletedMarch 18, 2021
February 1, 2021
2.2 years
March 15, 2018
February 4, 2021
February 24, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Opioid Consumption During First Postoperative Week
Cumulative opioid dose from days 0-7, collected on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 for the previous 24 hours at each time point measured in morphine equivalents
Postoperative days 0-7
Average Pain During First Postoperative Week
Mean value of the "average" pain scores measured using the numeric rating scale, collected on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 7 for the previous 24 hours at each time point. This is a 0-10 Likert scale measuring pain level with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst imaginable pain
Postoperative days 0-7
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Opioid Consumption Individual Time Points
Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, and 15; as well as Months 1 and 4
Brief Pain Inventory, Short Form (Interference Domain)
Postoperative days 3, and 7; as well as Months 1 and 4
Average Pain at Individual Time Points
Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, and 15; as well as Months 1 and 4
Worst Pain at Individual Time Points
Postoperative days 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, and 15; as well as Months 1 and 4
Least Pain at Individual Time Points
Postoperative days 3 and 7; as well as Months 1 and 4
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALACTIVE percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation with an ultrasound-guided percutaneous lead (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio) and wearable stimulator (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio) that generates electrical current
Sham
SHAM COMPARATORSHAM percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation with an ultrasound-guided percutaneous lead (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio) and wearable stimulator (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio) that does NOT generate electrical current
Interventions
ACTIVE peripheral nerve stimulation with a percutaneously inserted lead and wearable stimulator (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio) that generates electric current for 14 days
SHAM peripheral nerve stimulation with a percutaneously inserted lead and wearable stimulator (SPR Therapeutics, Cleveland, Ohio) that does not generate electric current for 14 days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years of age or older
- undergoing one of the following surgical procedures: rotator cuff repair, anterior cruciate ligament repair with a patellar autograph, ankle arthrodesis or arthroplasty, hallux valgus correction
- with a planned single-injection peripheral nerve block for postoperative analgesia
You may not qualify if:
- chronic analgesic use including opioids (daily use within the 2 weeks prior to surgery and duration of use \> 4 weeks)
- neuro-muscular deficit of the target nerve(s)
- compromised immune system based on medical history (e.g., immunosuppressive therapies such as chemotherapy, radiation, sepsis, infection), or other conditions that places the subject at increased risk
- implanted spinal cord stimulator, cardiac pacemaker/defibrillator, deep brain stimulator, or other implantable neurostimulator whose stimulus current pathway may overlap
- history of bleeding disorder
- antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapies other than aspirin due to the risk of bleeding with a 20-gauge insertion needle
- allergy to skin-contact materials (occlusive dressings, bandages, tape etc.)
- incarceration
- pregnancy
- chronic pain of greater than 3 months of any severity in an anatomic location other than the surgical extremity
- anxiety disorder
- history of substance abuse
- inability to contact the investigators during the treatment period, and vice versa (e.g., lack of telephone access).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, San Diegolead
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciencescollaborator
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Centercollaborator
- Wake Forest University Health Sciencescollaborator
- Augusta Universitycollaborator
- The Cleveland Cliniccollaborator
- Brooke Army Medical Centercollaborator
- United States Naval Medical Center, San Diegocollaborator
- VA Palo Alto Health Care Systemcollaborator
- Womack Army Medical Centercollaborator
- SPR Therapeutics, Inc.collaborator
Study Sites (6)
University California San Diego
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Naval Medical Center San Diego
San Diego, California, 92134, United States
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, 20889, United States
Womack Army medical Center
Fort Bragg, North Carolina, 28310, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Brooke Army Medical Center
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, 78234, United States
Related Publications (1)
Ilfeld BM, Gelfand H, Dhanjal S, Hackworth R, Plunkett A, Turan A, Vijjeswarapu AM, Cohen SP, Eisenach JC, Griffith S, Hanling S, Mascha EJ, Sessler DI. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation: A Pragmatic Effectiveness Trial of a Nonpharmacologic Alternative for the Treatment of Postoperative Pain. Pain Med. 2020 Dec 12;21(Suppl 2):S53-S61. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa332.
PMID: 33313729DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS
- Organization
- University of California San Diego
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brian M Ilfeld, MD, MS
University California San Diego
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Anesthesiology, In Residence
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2018
First Posted
March 29, 2018
Study Start
July 14, 2018
Primary Completion
September 11, 2020
Study Completion
January 7, 2021
Last Updated
March 18, 2021
Results First Posted
March 18, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share