Evaluation of a mHealth Intervention to Increase Adherence to Triage of Self-collected HPV+ Women (ATICA Project)
ATICA
Mixed-Methods Approach to Evaluate a mHealth Intervention to Increase Adherence to Triage of HPV+ Women Who Have Performed Self-collection
1 other identifier
interventional
5,389
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death among women worldwide, with more than 85% of cases occurring in low- and middle-income countries. Human papillomavirus (HPV) screening allows for self-collection with the potential to increase coverage, but still requires triage to identify which HPV+ women need diagnostic and treatment procedures. However, achieving high levels of triage adherence can be challenging, especially among socially vulnerable women. The ATICA protocol (Application of Communication and Information Technologies to Self-Collection, for its initials in Spanish), aimed at evaluating the implementation strategy and the effectiveness of a multi-component mobile health (mHealth) intervention to increase adherence to triage among women with HPV+ self-collected tests. Methods: Researchers will use an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type I trial with a mixed-methods evaluation approach. A cluster randomized trial design including 200 community health workers (CHWs) will evaluate whether the mHealth intervention increases adherence to triage among HPV+ women who self-collected at home during a CHW visit within 120 days after a positive result. The intervention includes an initial mobile phone text message (SMS) alert and subsequent reminders sent to HPV+ women. For those who do not adhere to triage within 60 days of a positive HPV test, an email and SMS will be sent to the CHWs to promote contact with these women during home visits. Reserchers will use the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as an organizing and analytic framework to evaluate the implementation of the intervention while also drawing on Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM). Researchers will conduct a self-administered, semi-structured survey of CHWs, semi-structured interviews with local health authorities, and a survey of HPV+ women.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 5, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 19, 2024
CompletedApril 19, 2024
November 1, 2023
12 months
March 20, 2018
December 23, 2022
November 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Women With Triage Pap Smears at 120 Days After HPV Results
The percentage of women with triage Pap smears at 120 days after HPV results are registered in the national screening information system (SITAM). This will allow measurement of the overall effect of the multi-component intervention including two periods: a) the 60 day period between the Test results and the SMS message and e-mail sent to Community Health Workers (CHW) (days 1-59); and b) the 60 day period between the SMS message and e-mail sent to CHWs and triage measurement (days 60-120)
120 days
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Women With Triage Pap Smears at 60 Days After HPV Results
60 days
Study Arms (2)
Multicomponent mHealth Intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORWomen with HPV self-collected tests will receive a multicomponent intervention which includes SMS text messages to remind them to attend triage. In addition, CHWs will receive reminders via e-mails to contact women if after 60 days from the HPV-results HPV+ they have not performed triage.
Usual Care
NO INTERVENTIONWomen with HPV self-collected tests receive usual care. Upon opting for the HPV self-collected test, women will be instructed to go to the health care center in 30 days to pick up the results.
Interventions
Women with HPV self-collected tests will receive a multicomponent intervention which includes SMS text messages to remind them to attend triage. In addition, CHWs will receive reminders via e-mails to contact women if after 60 days from the HPV-results HPV+ they have not performed triage
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- In the Randomized Controlled Trial we will recruit a minimum of 4000 women, aged 30 and older living in the province of Jujuy, Argentina.
- Having performed self-collection of HPV-testing.
- Mentally competent to understand the consent form.
- Able to communicate with study staff.
- Being able to provide a mobile phone telephone number.
You may not qualify if:
- Current pregnancy.
- Women with Mental disability.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Centro de Estudio de Estado y Sociedadlead
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institutecollaborator
- Deakin Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Multiple facilities
San Salvador de Jujuy, Jujuy Province, Argentina
Related Publications (26)
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, Forman D, Bray F. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015 Mar 1;136(5):E359-86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
PMID: 25220842BACKGROUNDMurillo R, Almonte M, Pereira A, Ferrer E, Gamboa OA, Jeronimo J, Lazcano-Ponce E. Cervical cancer screening programs in Latin America and the Caribbean. Vaccine. 2008 Aug 19;26 Suppl 11:L37-48. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.013.
PMID: 18945401BACKGROUNDArrossi S, Paolino M, Thouyaret L, Laudi R, Campanera A. Evaluation of scaling-up of HPV self-collection offered by community health workers at home visits to increase screening among socially vulnerable under-screened women in Jujuy Province, Argentina. Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 13;12(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0548-1.
PMID: 28193227BACKGROUNDCuzick J, Arbyn M, Sankaranarayanan R, Tsu V, Ronco G, Mayrand MH, Dillner J, Meijer CJ. Overview of human papillomavirus-based and other novel options for cervical cancer screening in developed and developing countries. Vaccine. 2008 Aug 19;26 Suppl 10:K29-41. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.019.
PMID: 18847555BACKGROUNDDillner J, Rebolj M, Birembaut P, Petry KU, Szarewski A, Munk C, de Sanjose S, Naucler P, Lloveras B, Kjaer S, Cuzick J, van Ballegooijen M, Clavel C, Iftner T; Joint European Cohort Study. Long term predictive values of cytology and human papillomavirus testing in cervical cancer screening: joint European cohort study. BMJ. 2008 Oct 13;337:a1754. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1754.
PMID: 18852164BACKGROUNDGok M, Heideman DA, van Kemenade FJ, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, Spruyt JW, Voorhorst F, Belien JA, Babovic M, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ. HPV testing on self collected cervicovaginal lavage specimens as screening method for women who do not attend cervical screening: cohort study. BMJ. 2010 Mar 11;340:c1040. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c1040.
PMID: 20223872BACKGROUNDArbyn M, Verdoodt F, Snijders PJ, Verhoef VM, Suonio E, Dillner L, Minozzi S, Bellisario C, Banzi R, Zhao FH, Hillemanns P, Anttila A. Accuracy of human papillomavirus testing on self-collected versus clinician-collected samples: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):172-83. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70570-9. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
PMID: 24433684BACKGROUNDArrossi S, Thouyaret L, Herrero R, Campanera A, Magdaleno A, Cuberli M, Barletta P, Laudi R, Orellana L; EMA Study team. Effect of self-collection of HPV DNA offered by community health workers at home visits on uptake of screening for cervical cancer (the EMA study): a population-based cluster-randomised trial. Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Feb;3(2):e85-94. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70354-7.
PMID: 25617202BACKGROUNDGiorgi Rossi P, Marsili LM, Camilloni L, Iossa A, Lattanzi A, Sani C, Di Pierro C, Grazzini G, Angeloni C, Capparucci P, Pellegrini A, Schiboni ML, Sperati A, Confortini M, Bellanova C, D'Addetta A, Mania E, Visioli CB, Sereno E, Carozzi F; Self-Sampling Study Working Group. The effect of self-sampled HPV testing on participation to cervical cancer screening in Italy: a randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN96071600). Br J Cancer. 2011 Jan 18;104(2):248-54. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606040. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
PMID: 21179038BACKGROUNDLeniz J, Barriga MI, Lagos M, Ibanez C, Puschel K, Ferreccio C. HPV vaginal self-sampling among women non-adherent to Papanicolaou screening in Chile. Salud Publica Mex. 2013 Apr;55(2):162-9. doi: 10.1590/s0036-36342013000200007.
PMID: 23546407BACKGROUNDZehbe I, Moeller H, Severini A, Weaver B, Escott N, Bell C, Crawford S, Bannon D, Paavola N. Feasibility of self-sampling and human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in First Nation women from Northwest Ontario, Canada: a pilot study. BMJ Open. 2011 Feb 26;1(1):e000030. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2010-000030.
PMID: 22021733BACKGROUNDWHO Guidelines for Screening and Treatment of Precancerous Lesions for Cervical Cancer Prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK195239/
PMID: 24716265BACKGROUNDInstituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos (INDEC). Encuesta Nacional sobre Acceso y Uso de Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación (ENTIC). Resultados del tercer trimestre de 2011. Buenos Aires: INDEC; 2012. Available from: http://www.indec.gov.ar/uploads/informesdeprensa/entic_06_13.pdf (accessed October 3, 2015).
BACKGROUNDCurran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.
PMID: 22310560BACKGROUNDGlasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1322.
PMID: 10474547BACKGROUNDDamschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexander JA, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 7;4:50. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
PMID: 19664226BACKGROUNDSofaer S. Qualitative methods: what are they and why use them? Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1101-18.
PMID: 10591275BACKGROUNDTeddlie C, Tashakkori A. Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In Tashakkori A & Teddlie C (Eds.). Handbook of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003
BACKGROUNDDiez-Canseco F, Zavala-Loayza JA, Beratarrechea A, Kanter R, Ramirez-Zea M, Rubinstein A, Martinez H, Miranda JJ. Design and Multi-Country Validation of Text Messages for an mHealth Intervention for Primary Prevention of Progression to Hypertension in Latin America. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Feb 18;3(1):e19. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3874.
PMID: 25693595BACKGROUNDCormick G, Ciganda A, Cafferata ML, Ripple MJ, Sosa-Estani S, Buekens P, Belizan JM, Althabe F. Text message interventions for follow up of infants born to mothers positive for Chagas disease in Tucuman, Argentina: a feasibility study. BMC Res Notes. 2015 Sep 29;8:508. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1498-9.
PMID: 26419230BACKGROUNDBobrow K, Brennan T, Springer D, Levitt NS, Rayner B, Namane M, Yu LM, Tarassenko L, Farmer A. Efficacy of a text messaging (SMS) based intervention for adults with hypertension: protocol for the StAR (SMS Text-message Adherence suppoRt trial) randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2014 Jan 11;14:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-28.
PMID: 24410738BACKGROUNDRubinstein A, Miranda JJ, Beratarrechea A, Diez-Canseco F, Kanter R, Gutierrez L, Bernabe-Ortiz A, Irazola V, Fernandez A, Letona P, Martinez H, Ramirez-Zea M; GISMAL group. Effectiveness of an mHealth intervention to improve the cardiometabolic profile of people with prehypertension in low-resource urban settings in Latin America: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Jan;4(1):52-63. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00381-2. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
PMID: 26653067BACKGROUNDCuberli M, Arrossi S. Consejería para la prevención del cáncer de cuello de útero. Propuestas para una mejor comunicación con las mujeres durante el tamizaje, seguimiento y tratamiento. Buenos Aires: Instituto Nacional del Cáncer (INC); 2013.
BACKGROUNDCampbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG; CONSORT Group. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012 Sep 4;345:e5661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5661. No abstract available.
PMID: 22951546BACKGROUNDPalmer MJ, Henschke N, Villanueva G, Maayan N, Bergman H, Glenton C, Lewin S, Fonhus MS, Tamrat T, Mehl GL, Free C. Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving sexual and reproductive health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 14;8(8):CD013680. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013680.
PMID: 32779730DERIVEDArrossi S, Paolino M, Orellana L, Thouyaret L, Kohler RE, Viswanath K. Mixed-methods approach to evaluate an mHealth intervention to increase adherence to triage of human papillomavirus-positive women who have performed self-collection (the ATICA study): study protocol for a hybrid type I cluster randomized effectiveness-implementation trial. Trials. 2019 Feb 26;20(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3229-3.
PMID: 30808379DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Silvina Arrossi
- Organization
- CEDES
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Silvina Arrossi, Phd
CEDES/CONICET
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2018
First Posted
March 27, 2018
Study Start
December 5, 2018
Primary Completion
November 30, 2019
Study Completion
August 31, 2020
Last Updated
April 19, 2024
Results First Posted
April 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-11