NCT03477643

Brief Summary

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell neoplasm representing the second most common type of hematologic tumor after lymphomas. The incorporation of novel agents such as bortezomib, lenalidomide, or thalidomide into first-line treatment as well as in relapse settings has led to a significant improvement in survival rates for MM patients, which have doubled in the last 5-7 years (1,2). However, except for a small percentage of patients (10-30%)(3) that may achieve a cure after first-line treatment, in the majority of cases, MM behaves as an incurable disease whose clinical course is characterized by repeated relapses, shorter and shorter periods of remission, and by becoming refractory to succesive treatments (bortezomib or lenalidomide). In this situation, survival is generally less than 9 months, which underscores the need to develop new drugs for MM patients Pomalidomide, a third-generation immunomodulatory drug (IMiD), has demonstrated efficacy in patients with relapsed and refractory MM, with an overall response rate that fluctuates between 30-60% depending on whether it is administered in combination with low-dose dexamethasone or in association with treatment with a cytostatic agent such as cyclophosphamide. In clinical trial CC-4047-MM-003, treatment with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and refractory MM or those intolerant to bortezomib or lenalidomide was a successful rescue treatment in 30% of patients with a median progression-free survival of 4 months. The association of cyclophosphamide at dose of 400mg/day on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle is able to increase the overall response rate from 39% for combination pomalidomide-dexamethasone to up to 65% for the triple regimen (pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, dexamethasone - POMCIDEX), as well as the median PFS from 4.4 mo. to 9.2 mo. respectively. As well, the tolerance and safety profiles of the triple combination pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone were acceptable. The association of bortezomib with pomalidomide-dexamethasone also increases the overall response rate (85%) and prolongs PFS (10.7 months). The BiRD study (lenalidomide, dexamethasone, and clarithromycin) suggests that clarithromycin intensifies the effect of corticosteroids, increasing their anti-myeloma effect . A study evaluating the combination of clarithromycin with pomalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in RRMM patients showed an overall response rate of 57% and clinical benefit rate (considered equal or superior to minor response) of 66%. Since July 2014, pomalidomide (Imnovid®) in combination with dexamethasone has been approved for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed and refractory MM who have received at least two prior lines of therapy (including bortezomib and lenalidomide) and who have shown progressive disease to the last line of treatment. In Spain in January of 2015, and in the Spanish Myeloma Group (GEM) context, we implemented clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of RRMM patients who are candidates for pomalidomide treatment with a triple therapy combination pomalidomide + cyclophosphamide + low-dose dexamethasone (POMCIDEX) (Appendix 1). The goal of the clinical practice guidelines was to increase the overall response rate, quality of response, and progression-free survival in patients treated with POMCIDEX. In patients with suboptimal response (defined as stable disease in the first 3 cycles, or inferior to partial response after six cycles according to International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response Criteria \[7\]), clarithromycin can be added to their treatment at a dose of 500mg/12hrs on days 1-28 of each cycle. Treatment can be administered until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or based on patient decision. Keeping in mind the time that has passed since the approval of pomalidomide for use in Spain and the publication of the clinical practice guidelines, we believe it is now time for a retrospective evaluation of the results of the therapeutic guidelines for Spanish MM patients and to review the viability of the recommendations contained in the guidelines with respect to compliance with the same, and effectiveness of the planned course of treatment. Once the viability of the proposed therapy regimen has been evaluated, other analyses for the purpose of studying the clinical results of treatment can be carried out as a separate analysis. The therapeutic paradigm for MM is rapidly changing due to the availability of new drugs for the treatment of patients with refractory or relapsed disease, making clinical decisions more challenging. For this reason, the availability of data obtained from real-life settings, outside of clinical trials, is essential in order to choose the appropriate treatment for each patient

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
110

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2018

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

27 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 13, 2018

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 26, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 27, 2018

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 14, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 14, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2021

Status Verified

February 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

March 13, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2021

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Level of compliance at PETHEMA centres in Spain with the clinical practice guidelines proposed by the Spanish Myeloma Group for the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM with POMCIDEX.

    To evaluate the viability of the therapeutic guidelines, measured in terms of compliance and the effectiveness of the treatment planned.

    3 months

Study Arms (1)

Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who have received treatment with pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone following the GEM-PETHEMA clinical practice guidelines between 01/01/2015 to 01/04/2018

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients treated with POMCIDEX during the period 01/01/2015 and 01/04/2018 in accordance with the PETHEMA clinical practice guidelines. The inclusion criteria in the guidelines are those specified in the clinical practice guidelines

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who have not been treated according to the clinical practice guidelines during the specified period

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (27)

Hospital de Sant Joan de Déu

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Hospital Donostia-Donostia Ospitalea

Donostia / San Sebastian, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario Virgen de Las Nieves

Granada, Spain

Location

Hospital General San Jorge - Huesca

Huesca, Spain

Location

Hospital de Jaén

Jaén, Spain

Location

Hospital Lucus Augusti

Lugo, Spain

Location

Hospital Clínico San Carlos

Madrid, Spain

Location

Hospital Del Tajo

Madrid, Spain

Location

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón

Madrid, Spain

Location

Hospital Ramón Y Cajal

Madrid, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

Madrid, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

Madrid, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor

Madrid, Spain

Location

Complejo Hospitalario de Especialidades Virgen de La Victoria

Málaga, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Arrixaca

Murcia, Spain

Location

Hospital Central de Asturias

Oviedo, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitari Son Espases

Palma de Mallorca, Spain

Location

Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra

Pamplona, Spain

Location

Hospital El Bierzo

Ponferrada, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario de Salamanca

Salamanca, Spain

Location

Hospital Mutua Terrassa

Terrassa, Spain

Location

Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo

Toledo, Spain

Location

Hospital Arnau de Vilanova

Valencia, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset Aleixandre

Valencia, Spain

Location

Hospital Universitario La Fe

Valencia, Spain

Location

HOSPITAL CLíNICO UNIVERSITARIO DE VALLADOLID

Valladolid, Spain

Location

Hospital Txagorritxu

Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain

Location

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

RecurrenceMultiple Myeloma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Disease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeoplasms, Plasma CellNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHemostatic DisordersVascular DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesParaproteinemiasBlood Protein DisordersHematologic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesHemorrhagic DisordersLymphoproliferative DisordersImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2018

First Posted

March 26, 2018

Study Start

April 27, 2018

Primary Completion

July 14, 2020

Study Completion

July 14, 2020

Last Updated

February 5, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations