DYSMOSTIM
Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - Health Related Quality of Life After Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Stimulation in Patients With Ineffective Esophageal Motilitygus (IEM)
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
17
1 country
1
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
January 15, 2018
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 15, 2018
Actual (reported)The aim of this study is to evaluate gastroesophageal reflux disease - health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) after electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal dysmotility.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
June 15, 2018
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
May 1, 2017
Actual (reported)January 15, 2018
Actual (reported)March 13, 2018
Actual (reported)March 26, 2018
Actual (reported)June 15, 2018
Actual (reported)Change in patient's GERD-HRQL from baseline to 6 months.
GERD related quality of life (QoL) is assessed with the "gastroesophageal reflux disease - health related quality of life" (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire. QoL is measured at baseline and at six months afters surgery. At unscheduled follow up visits QoL assessment is non-compulsory. The GERD-HRQL score consists of ten questions regarding GERD-related symptoms and their influence on QoL. Total scores range from 0 to 75. Testing will be split to a questionnaire for heartburn (0-30) and a questionnaire for regurgitation (0-30), the two cardinal symptoms of GERD. Lower scores indicate better QoL. This questionnaire was designed to objectively quantify symptom severity and was described validated by Velanovich et al and since then is the most frequently used GERD specific questionnaire.
6 months
Change of pH-metry from baseline to 6 months follow up
6 months
Change of number of reflux events >1minute and >5 minute duration from baseline to 6 months follow up
6 months
Distal Contractile Integral
6 months
Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) refractory to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) according to the Chicago classification v3.0.
Laparoscopic implantation of an electrical stimulation device to perform an electrical sphincter augmentation for the treatment of GERD.
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090, Austria
Peery AF, Crockett SD, Barritt AS, Dellon ES, Eluri S, Gangarosa LM, Jensen ET, Lund JL, Pasricha S, Runge T, Schmidt M, Shaheen NJ, Sandler RS. Burden of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology. 2015 Dec;149(7):1731-1741.e3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.045. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
Subramanian CR, Triadafilopoulos G. Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2015 Feb;3(1):41-53. doi: 10.1093/gastro/gou061. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
Sebastian F Schoppmann, MD
Medical University of Vienna
17 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
March 13, 2018
First Posted
March 26, 2018
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Actual (reported)Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Richter JE. Gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: side effects and complications of fundoplication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 May;11(5):465-71; quiz e39. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.006. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
Novitsky YW, Wong J, Kercher KW, Litwin DE, Swanstrom LL, Heniford BT. Severely disordered esophageal peristalsis is not a contraindication to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2007 Jun;21(6):950-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9126-3. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
Rodriguez L, Rodriguez P, Neto MG, Ayala JC, Saba J, Berel D, Conklin J, Soffer E. Short-term electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter increases sphincter pressure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 May;24(5):446-50, e213. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2012.01878.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
Rodriguez L, Rodriguez PA, Gomez B, Netto MG, Crowell MD, Soffer E. Electrical stimulation therapy of the lower esophageal sphincter is successful in treating GERD: long-term 3-year results. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2666-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4539-5. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
Velanovich V. The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20(2):130-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2007.00658.x.
Velanovich V. Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 1998 Mar-Apr;2(2):141-5. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(98)80004-8.
Paireder M, Kristo I, Asari R, Jomrich G, Steindl J, Rieder E, Schoppmann SF. Effect of electrical stimulation therapy of the lower esophageal sphincter in GERD patients with ineffective esophageal motility. Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6101-6107. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08104-3. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
Primary Completion
January 15, 2018
Actual (reported)Study Completion
June 15, 2018
Actual (reported)Last Updated
July 5, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-07
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: