Effects of THC on Emotional Memory Retrieval
TARE
The Effects of Δ⁹-Tetrahydrocannabinol on the Retrieval of Emotional Memories
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The main purpose of this study was to examine the effects of THC on the retrieval of emotional and neutral memories in healthy young adults. Secondary experiments included the effects of THC on the encoding of object and scene stimuli and a novel working memory task.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for early_phase_1 healthy
Started Feb 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 4, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2018
CompletedMay 30, 2019
March 1, 2018
8 months
March 7, 2018
May 28, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Emotional Memory
Hit and false alarm rates for negative, neutral, and positive picture stimuli
Two hours after placebo/THC administration.
DRM Memory
Hit and false alarm rates for the DRM task
Two and a half hours after placebo/THC administration.
Object Memory
Hit and false alarm rates for object stimuli on the same or different encoding scenes
48 hours after placebo/THC administration.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Addiction Research Centre Inventory Marijuana Scale
Assessed just prior to placebo/THC administration and then 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, and 115 minutes after placebo/THC administration.
Visual Analog Scales
Assessed just prior to placebo/THC administration and then 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, and 115 minutes after placebo/THC administration.
Drug Effects Questionnaire
Assessed just prior to placebo/THC administration and then 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, and 115 minutes after placebo/THC administration.
Physiological Measure 1
Assessed just prior to placebo/THC administration and then 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, and 115 minutes after placebo/THC administration.
Physiological Measure 2
Assessed just prior to placebo/THC administration and then 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, and 115 minutes after placebo/THC administration.
Study Arms (2)
Placebo oral capsule
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants came in for the first session that involved encoding emotional pictures and lists of semantically related words (Deese-Roediger-McDermott or DRM task; a false memory task). Forty-eight hours later, participants received a placebo capsule (dextrose) and waited 2 hours Participants were monitored for the next 2 hours including physiological and subjective measures every 30 minutes. After 2 hours, participants' memory for the emotional stimuli and DRM stimuli was tested. Participants then encoded object stimuli overlaid onto scenes followed by a working memory test with simple color squares. After the memory tests and 3.5 hours post-capsule, if participants' physiological and subjective measures had returned to baseline, they were allowed to leave. Forty-eight hours later, memory for the object-scene stimuli was tested. Other than the capsule, this arm was identical to the THC arm.
THC
EXPERIMENTALParticipants came in for the first session that involved encoding emotional pictures and lists of semantically related words (Deese-Roediger-McDermott or DRM task; a false memory task). Forty-eight hours later, participants received a placebo capsule (dextrose) and waited 2 hours Participants were monitored for the next 2 hours including physiological and subjective measures every 30 minutes. After 2 hours, participants' memory for the emotional stimuli and DRM stimuli was tested. Participants then encoded object stimuli overlaid onto scenes followed by a working memory test with simple color squares. After the memory tests and 3.5 hours post-capsule, if participants' physiological and subjective measures had returned to baseline, they were allowed to leave. Forty-eight hours later, memory for the object-scene stimuli was tested. Other than the capsule, this arm was identical to the placebo arm.
Interventions
A capsule that contains 15 mg of THC as well as dextrose filler administered 2 hours prior to memory testing.
A capsule that contains only dextrose filler administered 2 hours prior to memory testing.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- lifetime cannabis occasions
You may not qualify if:
- Current Axis I DSM-IV disorder, including substance dependence, current use of \>5 cigarettes per day, history of psychosis or mania, less than a high school education, lack of English fluency, a body mass index outside 19-33 kg/m2, high blood pressure (\>140/90), abnormal electrocardiogram, daily use of any medication other than birth control, pregnancy, or lactating.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637, United States
Related Publications (2)
Doss MK, Weafer J, Gallo DA, de Wit H. Delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol During Encoding Impairs Perceptual Details yet Spares Context Effects on Episodic Memory. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2020 Jan;5(1):110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.08.007. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
PMID: 31668830DERIVEDDoss MK, Weafer J, Gallo DA, de Wit H. Delta9-Tetrahydrocannabinol at Retrieval Drives False Recollection of Neutral and Emotional Memories. Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Nov 15;84(10):743-750. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.04.020. Epub 2018 May 9.
PMID: 29884456DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Harriet de Wit, PhD
University of Chicago
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
David A Gallo, PhD
University of Chicago
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- early phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- A lab member that knew the design of the study but was not running participants sorted placebo and THC capsules into bags labeled "first capsule and "second capsule" for each participant.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2018
First Posted
March 20, 2018
Study Start
February 15, 2017
Primary Completion
October 4, 2017
Study Completion
October 4, 2017
Last Updated
May 30, 2019
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- The data is already available.
- Access Criteria
- Open to anyone.
The investigators have shared all of the data to https://osf.io/e6b5k/