Prospective Evaluation of Pain Assessment and Management Protocol for Post-procedural Pain After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of Colonic Polyps >20mm
Persistent Pain After Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: Predictors, a Management Algorithm and Outcomes
1 other identifier
observational
325
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large (≥20 mm) laterally spreading colonic lesions (LSL) is safe, effective and superior to surgery. This advantage is based on a day stay model of care, however the most common adverse event is abdominal pain and this is a major impediment to this efficiency. No prospective data exist on the optimal selection of analgesics, the necessary recovery period or the triggers that should alert the practitioner to a more serious trajectory and the need for escalation of care. We aimed to characterise potential predictors for persistent (\>5 minutes) post-procedural pain (PP) and develop a simple and effective management algorithm for patients with PP based on the need for analgesics in recovery. Data on consecutive patients with a LSL referred for EMR at a single, tertiary referral centre were included. Patient and lesion characteristics and peri-procedural data were prospectively collected. Standard post EMR care included 2 hours in first stage recovery followed by 1 hour in 2nd stage recovery where clear fluids were given and discharge after if the patients were well. PP was graded from 0 to 10 using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). If PP occurred \>5 minutes, 1 gram of paracetamol was administered parenterally and outcomes were monitored. If pain settled the patient was transferred to second stage recovery after medical review. PP \>30 minutes lead to clinical review and upgrade of analgesics to fentanyl, with a starting dose of 25 micrograms (mcg) up to a maximum of 100 mcg. Investigations, admission and interventions for PP are recorded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2015
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 27, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 20, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2021
CompletedJune 29, 2023
June 1, 2023
3.8 years
July 9, 2017
June 28, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of patients with EMR related pain post-procedurally
Patients are observed for pain post-procedurally and data collected on when/how pain is relieved
up to 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Correlate post-procedural pain with procedural data
up to 24 hours
Study Arms (1)
Post EMR
Patients are observed post EMR procedure for pain. Standard of care data is collected
Eligibility Criteria
Data on consecutive patients with a LSL referred for EMR at a single, tertiary referral centre were included. Patient and lesion characteristics and peri-procedural data were prospectively collected. Standard post EMR care included 2 hours in first stage recovery followed by 1 hour in 2nd stage recovery where clear fluids were given and discharge after if the patients were well. PP was graded from 0 to 10 using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). If PP occurred \>5 minutes, 1 gram of paracetamol was administered parenterally and outcomes were monitored. If pain settled the patient was transferred to second stage recovery after medical review. PP \>30 minutes lead to clinical review and upgrade of analgesics to fentanyl, with a starting dose of 25 micrograms (mcg) up to a maximum of 100 mcg. Investigations, admission and interventions for PP were recorded.
You may qualify if:
- All patients referred to Westmead Hospital Endoscopy Unit to undergo an EMR of a colonic lesion reported to be ≥20mm in size.
- Age ≥18 years.
- Patients able to give informed consent to involvement in the trial. For patients who do not speak English, an interpreter will be asked to translate the informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Inability to sign informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Westmead Hospital
Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
Related Publications (1)
Desomer L, Tate DJ, Pillay L, Awadie H, Sidhu M, Ahlenstiel G, Bourke MJ. Intravenous paracetamol for persistent pain after endoscopic mucosal resection discriminates patients at risk of adverse events and those who can be safely discharged. Endoscopy. 2023 Jul;55(7):611-619. doi: 10.1055/a-2022-6530. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
PMID: 36716781DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor of Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2017
First Posted
March 20, 2018
Study Start
August 27, 2015
Primary Completion
June 1, 2019
Study Completion
September 1, 2021
Last Updated
June 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-06