Wound Dressing With Moisture Sensor
Clinical Functional Assessment of Moisture Sensor on Wound Dressing
Sponsor study identifier
interventional
5
1 country
2
Study Start
May 28, 2018
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
November 22, 2019
Actual (reported)Study Completion
November 22, 2019
Actual (reported)Explorative study of function of a moisture sensor on top of a superabsorbent wound dressing on exuding leg ulcers.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
November 22, 2019
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
February 26, 2018
Actual (reported)March 19, 2018
Actual (reported)May 28, 2018
Actual (reported)November 22, 2019
Actual (reported)November 22, 2019
Actual (reported)June 2, 2020
Actual (reported)Number of Dressing Changes With Sensor Activation at Correct Timing
Sensor activation - measured as indication on the sensor display; indication at correct time, indication but not att correct time, no indication.
Inclusion visit to study completed after 3 dressing changes, 1-2 weeks
Timing of Dressing Change Related to Dressing Size and Weight After Use
Dressing weight after use were measured on a scale and recorded. The weight were compared to a predefined table. Dressing size 10x10 cm: Changed too early \<11 g Correct change 11-26 g Changed too late \>26 g Dressing size 10x20 cm: Changed too early \<17 g Correct change 17-62 g Changed too late \>62 g Dressing size 20x20 cm: Changed too early \<26 g Correct change 26-109 g Changed too late \>109 g
Inclusion visit to study completed after 3 dressing changes, 1-2 weeks
Complications if the Dressing Was Switched Too Late.
Inclusion visit to study completed after 3 dressing changes, 1-2 weeks
Level of Usability
Inclusion visit to study completed after 3 dressing changes, 1-2 weeks
Wound Size After Three Dressing Changes
At final dressing change no.3 (after 1-2 weeks)
Investigational device is Absorbest moisture sensor in variant A and variant B, placed on the backside of the wound dressing DryMax Extra Soft. Participants performed three dressing changes. They first received variant A, at next dressing change they received variant B, and on the third dressing change they received variant A again. No washout periods.
Investigational device is Absorbest moisture sensor in variant A and variant B, placed on the backside of the wound dressing DryMax Extra Soft. Participants performed three dressing changes. They first received variant B, at next dressing change they received variant A, and on the third dressing change they received variant B again. No washout periods.
Study profile of sensor activation
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Hudkliniken, University hospital
Linköping, Region Östergötland, Sweden
S2Clinic
Linköping, Sweden
Small trial, a first test of concept using a moisture sensor on top of a wound dressing.
MD., PhD. Iredahl
Aby vardcentral, Region Ostergotland
5 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
February 26, 2018
First Posted
March 19, 2018
Study Start
May 28, 2018
Actual (reported)Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
November 22, 2019
Actual (reported)Study Completion
November 22, 2019
Actual (reported)Last Updated
June 2, 2020
Results First Posted
June 2, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-05
Data will be analyzed and published on a group level.
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: