NCT03468660

Brief Summary

Older people experience great difficulty understanding speech, especially accented English, and this problem is expected to increase with the influx of immigrants who provide services to the elderly population. The research examines the underlying factors that contribute to older listeners' difficulty understanding accented speech, including those associated with age-related hearing loss, changes in processing in auditory pathways in the brain, and general cognitive decline. The investigation also evaluates the efficacy of training strategies to improve understanding of accented English by older people. Outcomes of this research are expected to improve communication between senior citizens and those with whom they interact daily, and thereby improve quality of life for the older segment of the Nation's population.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
82

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2018

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 18, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 6, 2018

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 16, 2018

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2020

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 30, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

March 14, 2022

Status Verified

February 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

2.4 years

First QC Date

March 6, 2018

Last Update Submit

February 24, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Accented speech perception

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Recognition of accented speech stimuli used for training

    Scale: Accented words (n = 160) and accented sentences (n = 35 sentences) used in training; construct: measures percent correct recognition; minimum score = 0%, maximum score = 100%. Higher values are considered a better outcome

    1 day

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Generalization of benefit in recognizing accented speech

    1 day

  • Retention of benefit in recognizing accented speech

    through study completion, an average of two weeks

Study Arms (3)

Experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

Auditory training with feedback

Behavioral: Auditory training with feedback

Passive control group

NO INTERVENTION

Pre-post testing only; no training

Active Control group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Listening task with no feeback

Behavioral: Listening paradigm with no feedback

Interventions

Experimental group receives phoneme-level and sentence-level training with feedback

Experimental group

Active controls listen to acoustic stimuli with no feedback

Active Control group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age and hearing sensitivity:
  • Younger listeners (18-40 years) with normal hearing;
  • Older listeners (65-80 years) with normal hearing;
  • Older listeners (65-80 years) with bilateral, mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
  • High School Diploma,
  • native speaker of English (based on self-report)
  • normal middle-ear function (based on tympanometry)
  • normal cognitive function (based on score on Montreal Cognitive Assessment)
  • good-to-excellent word recognition scores (based on Northwestern University Test # 6 word recognition scores presented in quiet at suprathreshold levels).

You may not qualify if:

  • non-native speaker of English,
  • motor and/or speech disorders that prevent participant from providing a time-locked response,
  • presence of middle ear disease or conductive hearing loss,
  • presence of severe or profound hearing loss,
  • presence of poor word recognition scores,
  • cognitive impairment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Maryland

College Park, Maryland, 20742, United States

Location

Related Publications (11)

  • Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Bieber RE, Jara Ureta DA, Freund MS, Fitzgibbons PJ. Effects of Listener Age and Native Language Experience on Recognition of Accented and Unaccented English Words. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Apr 26;62(4S):1131-1143. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-ASCC7-18-0122.

    PMID: 31026190BACKGROUND
  • Bieber RE, Yeni-Komshian GH, Freund MS, Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Effects of listener age and native language on perception of accented and unaccented sentences. J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Dec;144(6):3191. doi: 10.1121/1.5081711.

    PMID: 30599683BACKGROUND
  • Bieber RE, Gordon-Salant S. Adaptation to novel foreign-accented speech and retention of benefit following training: Influence of aging and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Apr;141(4):2800. doi: 10.1121/1.4980063.

  • Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Age effects in discrimination of intervals within accented tone sequences differing in accent type and sequence presentation rate. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Nov;140(5):3819. doi: 10.1121/1.4967512.

  • Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Pickett EJ, Fitzgibbons PJ. Perception of contrastive bi-syllabic lexical stress in unaccented and accented words by younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Mar;139(3):1132-48. doi: 10.1121/1.4943557.

  • Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ, Cohen JI. Effects of age and hearing loss on recognition of unaccented and accented multisyllabic words. J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Feb;137(2):884-97. doi: 10.1121/1.4906270.

  • Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ, Cohen JI, Waldroup C. Recognition of accented and unaccented speech in different maskers by younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):618-27. doi: 10.1121/1.4807817.

  • Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ. Recognition of accented English in quiet and noise by younger and older listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Nov;128(5):3152-60. doi: 10.1121/1.3495940.

  • Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ, Schurman J. Short-term adaptation to accented English by younger and older adults. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Oct;128(4):EL200-4. doi: 10.1121/1.3486199.

  • Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ. Recognition of accented English in quiet by younger normal-hearing listeners and older listeners with normal-hearing and hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Jul;128(1):444-55. doi: 10.1121/1.3397409.

  • Fitzgibbons PJ, Gordon-Salant S. Age-related differences in discrimination of temporal intervals in accented tone sequences. Hear Res. 2010 Jun 1;264(1-2):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Auditory Perceptual Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Auditory Diseases, CentralRetrocochlear DiseasesEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesPerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsCognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Sandra Gordon-Salant, Ph.D.

    University of Maryland

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Experimental group Active control group Passive control group
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2018

First Posted

March 16, 2018

Study Start

January 18, 2018

Primary Completion

June 30, 2020

Study Completion

June 30, 2020

Last Updated

March 14, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations