Hydrodilatation Versus Arthroscopic Capsular Release for Frozen Shoulder
A Randomised Control Trial of Arthroscopic Capsular Release Versus Hydrodilatation for Primary Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To compare the Oxford shoulder score at 6 months post intervention for primary frozen shoulder randomised to either an arthroscopic capsular release or hydro-dilatation
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2013
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 28, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2018
CompletedMarch 14, 2018
March 1, 2018
3.5 years
February 28, 2018
March 13, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Oxford shoulder score
Patient reported outcome with a maximum score of 48 and minimum of 0. 48 being the best outcome. Comprises 12 questions relating to pain and function specific to the shoulder
at 6months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Visual analogue score
at 6 months
clinical assessment of range of movement (external rotation, internal rotation, forward flexion and abduction)
at 6 months
Study Arms (2)
Arthroscopic capsular release
ACTIVE COMPARATORSurgical release performed under general anesthetic
Hydro-dilatation
ACTIVE COMPARATORinjection of water under local anesthetic in to shoulder joint
Interventions
surgical release of shoulder joint capsule
dilatation of shoulder joint capsule using water pressure under local anesthetic
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Medically fit for an operation; normal x-ray; Codmans criteria frozen shoulder
You may not qualify if:
- Secondary causes of frozen shoulder; rotator cuff tears found at arthroscopy or hydro-dilatation; unable to adhere to trial protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Royal Devon and Exeter hospital
Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
chris smith
Royal Devon and Exeter
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- independent clinical reviewer of patients ROM and collection of outcome scores
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 28, 2018
First Posted
March 13, 2018
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
December 1, 2016
Study Completion
June 1, 2017
Last Updated
March 14, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share