Evaluation of the Analgesic Effect of Dexmedetomidine Versus Fentanyl as Adjuvants to Epidural Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgeries
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To determine if the epidural route provide an acceptable analgesia in spine surgeries and avoided the need for excessive IV analgesics. Also to determine whatever dexmedetomidine or fentanyl is more better neuroaxial adjuvant regarding providing early onset and prolonged analgesia and stable cardiorespiratory parameters
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 4, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 2, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 6, 2018
CompletedMay 30, 2018
May 1, 2018
2 months
December 29, 2017
May 26, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-operative analgesia duration assessment
The duration of effective analgesia; "it is the duration of complete pain relief (zero pain) and ends by the appearance of any pain (even VAS is of one)."
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Post-operative assessment of pain
24 hours
Complete sensory and motor block
24 hours
Sedation assessment
24 hours
Heart rate monitoring
24 hours
Mean arterial blood pressure
24 hours
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Bupivacaine dexmedetomidine group
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 1 (bupivacaine + dexmedetomidine (BD) group); will Receive an epidural study solution of 18 ml of 0.25% of bupivacaine hydrochloride plus 1 ml of dexmedetomidine (1 mcg/kg) plus 1 ml normal saline keeping the total volume of 20 ml in a syringe pump .
Bupivacaine fentanyl group
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 2 (bupivacaine + fentanyl (BF) group) ; will Receive an epidural study solution of 18 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine plus 2 ml fentanyl (1 mcg/kg) keeping the total volume of 20 ml in a syringe pump .
Interventions
All cases of spine surgery will be done under G.A with the patient in prone position. After surgery an epidural catheter will be placed through a separate skin puncture above the incision The catheter will be positioned up to 7 cm from skin entry directing downwards in the epidural space . Once the patient in the post-operative room will be noted to have pain (VAS) of\>4, the study will start. A test dose of 3 ml lignocaine with adrenaline will be injected the following parameters will be noted . 1. The pain score, by using VAS 2. Onset of analgesia (fall of VAS\<4 ). 3. Peak level of analgesia ( VAS score 0). 4. Duration of analgesia (once the patient asks fwith VAS\>4). 5. Monitoring of NIBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate every 30 min. 6. Side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, Motor blockade "Bromage scale\>1" Also deep sedation "Ramsay sedation scale\>3" , And shivering and hypotension.
All cases of spine surgery will be done under G.A with the patient in prone position. After surgury an epidural catheter will be placed through a separate skin puncture above the incision The catheter will be positioned up to 7 cm from skin entry directing downwards in the epidural space . Once the patient in the post-operative room will be noted to have pain (VAS) of\>4, the study will start. A test dose of 3 ml lignocaine with adrenaline will be injected the following parameters will be noted . 1. The pain score, by using VAS 2. Onset of analgesia (fall of VAS\<4 ). 3. Peak level of analgesia ( VAS score 0). 4. Duration of analgesia (once the patient asks fwith VAS\>4). 5. Monitoring of NIBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate every 30 min. 6. Side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, Motor blockade "Bromage scale\>1" Also deep sedation "Ramsay sedation scale\>3" , And shivering and hypotension.
All cases of spine surgery will be done under G.A with the patient in prone position. After surgury an epidural catheter will be placed through a separate skin puncture above the incision The catheter will be positioned up to 7 cm from skin entry directing downwards in the epidural space . Once the patient in the post-operative room will be noted to have pain (VAS) of\>4, the study will start. A test dose of 3 ml lignocaine with adrenaline will be injected the following parameters will be noted . 1. The pain score, by using VAS 2. Onset of analgesia (fall of VAS\<4 ). 3. Peak level of analgesia ( VAS score 0). 4. Duration of analgesia (once the patient asks fwith VAS\>4). 5. Monitoring of NIBP, pulse rate, respiratory rate every 30 min. 6. Side-effects such as nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, Motor blockade "Bromage scale\>1" Also deep sedation "Ramsay sedation scale\>3" , And shivering and hypotension.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All male patients between the age group of 18 and 65 years
- Patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II.
- Patients who will undergo lumbar spine surgeries (laminectomy ± discectomy for PIVD (Prolapse of intervertebral disc), will be enrolled for this study
You may not qualify if:
- All Patients below the age of 18 years and above 65 years. Also All female patient are excluded from the study.
- Other spine surgeries rather than laminectomy, also surgeries on more than two levels.
- Patients with haematological disease, bleeding or coagulation test abnormalities, psychiatric diseases.
- Patiensts with history of drug abuse, allergy to any study medication. . 4 .Patients with cervical and thoracic spine surgeries, tubercular spine , any permanent neurological disorders and vertebral deformeties such as scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.
- \. Pregnant and lactating patients .
- Withdrawal criteria :
- Accidental Dural puncture.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
- Mohamed, Ahmed A., M.D.collaborator
- Tarek Ahmed Radwancollaborator
- Mohamed Mahmoud Mohamedcollaborator
- ismaiel saied hammadcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Ahmed Abdalla Mohamed
Cairo, 11451, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- An online randomization program (http://www.randomizer.org) will be used to generate random list and to allocate patients into the study groups. Random allocation numbers will be concealed in opaque closed envelops. The patient and investigator assessing study outcomes will all be blinded to the study groups allocation. The study drugs will be prepared by a separate investigator not involved in outcome assessment
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Anesthesia &I.C.U and Pain Clinic
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 29, 2017
First Posted
March 13, 2018
Study Start
March 4, 2018
Primary Completion
May 2, 2018
Study Completion
May 6, 2018
Last Updated
May 30, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Via scholar Gate