A Combined HAPA and mHealth Intervention to Increase Non-Sedentary Behaviours in Office-Working Adults
Using a Combined Health Action Process Approach and mHealth Intervention to Increase Non-Sedentary Behaviours in Office-Working Adults - A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
62
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Societal changes have resulted in reduced demands to be active and increased daily time spent sitting. Sedentary behavior (SB) has been linked to many health problems such as type 2 diabetes and heart disease. Office-working adults are a high-risk population for excessive SB. Increasing the length and frequency of breaks from sitting and increasing the time spent standing and engaged in light physical activity are ways to decrease SB. The purpose of this study is to determine whether combining a Health Action Process Approach-based (theory-driven), specifically action and coping planning intervention, with a tailored text messaging intervention can reduce workplace sitting time among adult office workers. Participants in the intervention group will receive one behavioural counselling session, followed by daily, tailored text messages over a 6-week period, with a focus on encouraging them to reduce their occupational sitting time by increasing their frequency and duration of breaks from sitting, as well as time spent standing and engaged in light-intensity physical activity. It is expected that office-working adults who receive the planning intervention and tailored text messages will report greater increases in non-sedentary behaviours (e.g., break frequency, break duration, standing, light physical activity) than those who do not receive the intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2019
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 26, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 12, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2019
CompletedJune 25, 2019
June 1, 2019
5 months
February 26, 2018
June 20, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Changes in Frequency of Breaks from Sitting at Work
Modified version of the SIT-Q 7d (Wijndaele et al., 2014; Sui \& Prapavessis, 2016); 1-item; 12-point scale
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, and at the 2-week follow-up (Week 8)
Changes in Duration of Breaks from Sitting at Work
Modified version of the SIT-Q 7d (Wijndaele et al., 2014; Sui \& Prapavessis, 2016); 1-item; 10-point scale
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, and at the 2-week follow-up (Week 8)
Changes in Time Spent Standing at Work
Five-item modified Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ; Chau, Van Der Ploeg, Dunn, Kurko, \& Bauman, 2012)
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, and at the 2-week follow-up (Week 8)
Changes in Time Spent Engaged in Light-Intensity Physical Activity (i.e., walking) at Work
Five-item modified Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ; Chau, Van Der Ploeg, Dunn, Kurko, \& Bauman, 2012)
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, and at the 2-week follow-up (Week 8)
Changes in Time Spent Sitting at Work
Five-item modified Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire (OSPAQ; Chau, Van Der Ploeg, Dunn, Kurko, \& Bauman, 2012); value: Minutes/Day
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, and at the 2-week follow-up (Week 8)
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Action Planning towards reducing workplace sitting time
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, and at the 2-week follow-up (Week 8)
Coping Planning towards reducing workplace sitting time
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, and at the 2-week follow-up (Week 8)
Action Control towards reducing workplace sitting time
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, and at the 2-week follow-up (Week 8)
Self-rated Work Performance
Baseline, Week 6
Role limitations due to physical health
Baseline, Week 6
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
HAPA-treatment
EXPERIMENTAL(SB-related planning + daily text messages)
Control
NO INTERVENTION(No Treatment) Participants randomly assigned to the control group will receive no information or intervention of any kind and will only be asked to complete the outcome questionnaires.
Interventions
Participants will receive a one-on-one behavioral counseling session, and planning sheet as reference for developing strategies as part of their Action/Coping Plan. Participants will be asked to form 3-4 actions/coping plans specifying when, where, how, and for how long they would reduce workplace sitting time; and anticipate potential barriers and identify ways they could be overcome. Strategies will focus on increasing break frequency to every 30-45 minutes, achieving a break duration of 2-3 minutes, and increasing standing and light-intensity PA time, during work hours. Participants will receive sedentary behaviour-related text messages twice daily, depending on their preferences and schedule, which will act as mini-booster interventions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To be eligible to participate, participants must: (a) be 18+ years of age, (b) be a full-time worker/employee in an office setting, (c) be in self-reported good mental and physical health, (d) be able to read and write in English, (e) have access to a computer with Internet, and (f) own a mobile phone with free unlimited incoming text messages.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Western Ontario
London, Ontario, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Rollo S, Prapavessis H. A Combined Health Action Process Approach and mHealth Intervention to Increase Non-Sedentary Behaviours in Office-Working Adults-A Randomised Controlled Trial. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2020 Nov;12(3):660-686. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12201. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
PMID: 32342662DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 26, 2018
First Posted
March 12, 2018
Study Start
January 1, 2019
Primary Completion
June 1, 2019
Study Completion
June 1, 2019
Last Updated
June 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06