Real Zero Fluoroscopy Catheter Ablation.
ZERO-Fluoro
Multi-center, Observational, Retrospective Comparison of the Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Real Zero Fluoroscopy Versus Conventional Fluoroscopic Catheter Ablation With and Without 3D System Support: Propensity Matched Study
1 other identifier
observational
300
1 country
3
Brief Summary
A Retrospective Propensity Matched Study comparing:
- real zero fluoroscopy catheter ablation
- conventional fluoroscopy catheter ablation without 3D system
- conventional fluoroscopy catheter ablation with 3D system
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 24, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 10, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2018
CompletedSeptember 10, 2018
September 1, 2018
8 months
February 24, 2018
September 7, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Procedural success rates
arrhythmia recurrence within 3 months since the index procedure
3 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Total procedure time
during procedure
Fluoroscopy time
during procedure
Acute procedural success
10-30 minutes
Recurrence rate
6 months
Acute Complications rate
during procedure
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Zero fluoro
Patients in whom Zero fluoroscopy ablation was performed under the guidance of Ensite for mapping and ablation and fluoroscopy will not be used during the procedure.
Conventional ablation without 3D
Patients in whom Conventional fluoroscopy ablation was performed under fluoroscopic guidance only. Additional use of Ensite/Carto/Localisa for mapping was not allowed.
Conventional ablation with 3D
Patients in whom Conventional fluoroscopy ablation was performed under fluoroscopic and Ensite/Carto guidance and ablation during the procedure. Use of fluoroscopy and additional Ensite/Carto for mapping and ablation was mandatory.
Interventions
Catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia - no fluoroscopy guidance
Catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia - fluoroscopy guidance only. 3D system (Every Ensite/Carto) is not allowed
Catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia - fluoroscopy guidance + 3D system support (Ensite/Carto)
Eligibility Criteria
Zero fluoroscopy group: patients after right atrium/ventricle arrhythmia ablation performed with 3D (Ensite/Carto) guidance but without fluoroscopy guidance Convectional fluoroscopy group: patients after right atrium/ventricle arrhythmia ablation performed with fluoroscopy guidance but without 3D (Ensite/Carto) guidance Convectional fluoroscopy group + 3D: patients after right atrium/ventricle arrhythmia ablation performed with fluoroscopy guidance and with 3D (Ensite/Carto) guidance
You may qualify if:
- right atrial tachycardia
- right atrial premature complexes
- AVNRT
- right atrial AVRT/WPW
- right ventricle tachycardia / right ventricle premature complexes
You may not qualify if:
- left atrium arrhythmia
- left ventricle arrhythmia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczn
Biała Podlaska, 21-500, Poland
Medical University of Lublin
Lublin, 20-091, Poland
SP ZOZ Szpital Puławy
Puławy, 24-100, Poland
Related Publications (7)
Yang L, Sun G, Chen X, Chen G, Yang S, Guo P, Wang Y, Wang DW. Meta-Analysis of Zero or Near-Zero Fluoroscopy Use During Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;118(10):1511-1518. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.014. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
PMID: 27639689BACKGROUNDCasella M, Ribatti V, Catto V, Vettor G, Fassini G, Biagioli V, Dello Russo A, Tondo C. Benefits of electroanatomic ablation of conventional cardiac arrhytmias: from fluoroscopy to zero X-ray mapping. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2018 Feb;66(1):49-62. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4725.17.04478-4. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
PMID: 28862408BACKGROUNDGaita F, Guerra PG, Battaglia A, Anselmino M. The dream of near-zero X-rays ablation comes true. Eur Heart J. 2016 Sep 21;37(36):2749-2755. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw223. Epub 2016 Jun 26.
PMID: 27354053BACKGROUNDSeizer P, Bucher V, Frische C, Heinzmann D, Gramlich M, Muller I, Henning A, Hofbeck M, Kerst G, Gawaz M, Schreieck J. Efficacy and safety of zero-fluoroscopy ablation for supraventricular tachycardias. Use of optional contact force measurement for zero-fluoroscopy ablation in a clinical routine setting. Herz. 2016 May;41(3):241-5. doi: 10.1007/s00059-015-4358-4. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
PMID: 26462477BACKGROUNDBulava A, Hanis J, Eisenberger M. Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Zero-Fluoroscopy Technique: A Randomized Trial. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Jul;38(7):797-806. doi: 10.1111/pace.12634. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
PMID: 25790320BACKGROUNDScaglione M, Ebrille E, Clemente FD, Gaita F, Bradfield JS. Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Without Radiation Exposure Using A 3D Mapping System. J Atr Fibrillation. 2015 Feb 28;7(5):1167. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1167. eCollection 2015 Feb-Mar.
PMID: 27957146BACKGROUNDAlvarez M, Bertomeu-Gonzalez V, Arcocha MF, Morina P, Tercedor L, Ferrero de Loma A, Pachon M, Garcia A, Pardo M, Datino T, Alonso C, Osca J; investigators of the Spanish Multicenter Registry of Fluoroscopy-free Ablation. Nonfluoroscopic Catheter Ablation. Results From a Prospective Multicenter Registry. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017 Sep;70(9):699-705. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2016.12.040. Epub 2017 Jan 31. English, Spanish.
PMID: 28159569RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maciej Wójcik, MD, PhD
Medical University of Lublin, Poland
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 24, 2018
First Posted
March 8, 2018
Study Start
March 10, 2018
Primary Completion
November 1, 2018
Study Completion
December 1, 2018
Last Updated
September 10, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-09