Does Transesophageal Echocardiography Along With an Orogastric Tube Improve the Image Quality Intraoperatively?
1 other identifier
interventional
47
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Image quality of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) tends to get worse during long hours of operations. An orogastric tube (OGT) is often inserted in the beginning of the case, and left there for intermittent suction as needed, or removed before TEE exam to prevent echoic artifacts. However, if left there, the effect of suction might be limited due to unreliable tip position of the OG tube. If removed, stomach will be distended again. We devised the OG tube attached TEE for practical suction and assessed its effect on image quality intraoperatively.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 23, 2024
CompletedSeptember 23, 2024
September 1, 2024
11 months
February 27, 2018
December 11, 2022
September 17, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Image Quality Assessment Method#1: Difference in Likert Scale Before and After Suctioning
Difference in image quality assessment by Likert scale before/after suctioning, by assessing quality of images stored before/after suctioning. Investigators categorized the quality of all acquired images on a numeric scale (the higher number means higher image quality) based on each investigator's impression (1: very poor, 2: poor, 3: acceptable, 4: good, and 5: very good). Image quality improvement was determined by increased number. Three investigators (A, B, C) assessed the quality of all TEE image sets (i.e. before and after suctioning) post hoc. The acquired numeric scales were combined, and compared before and after suctioning, and calculated how much percentage of patients had improved image quality (i.e. increase in numeric scale), same quality (i.e. same numeric scale), and worsened image quality (i.e. decrease in numeric scale)
TEE image sets were acquired after general anesthesia induction (before suction) and after 10minutes (after suction), and the outcome was the difference in image quality. In 6-8 months, investigator C did the same analysis on the same images in one day.
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Reproducibility of the Left Ventricular Fraction Area Change (LV FAC) (Inter-observer)
Images are acquired after general anesthesia induction (before suctioning) and after 10min (after suctioning)
Reproducibility of the Left Ventricular Fraction Area Change (LV FAC) (Intra-observer)
6-8 months after initial images obtained during surgery
Study Arms (2)
TEE image before suction
NO INTERVENTIONSuction orogastric tube which is attached to TEE probe
TEE image after suction
EXPERIMENTALSuction orogastric tube which is attached to TEE probe
Interventions
Suction orogastric tube which is attached to TEE probe
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- adult cardiac surgery or liver transplant surgery
You may not qualify if:
- TEE with significant wall motion abnormality or TEE contraindicated patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
HFHS
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Yoshihisa Morita
- Organization
- Henry Ford Hospital
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Donald Penning, MD
HFHS
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2018
First Posted
March 5, 2018
Study Start
February 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2017
Study Completion
December 31, 2017
Last Updated
September 23, 2024
Results First Posted
September 23, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09