NCT03454334

Brief Summary

This investigation assessed the visual performance of presbyopia and cataract patients after bilateral implantation of 4 distinct sorts of multifocal IOLs: At lisa tri, PanOptix, ReSTOR, and Symfony. The clinical results demonstrated here were excellent for four groups, however, there were also differences in group ReSTOR, UCVA and BCVA for the intermediate and near of the other groups showed less vision also symphony group for far distance demonstrated less vision than other groups, which may be related to their design.Multifocal IOLs demonstrated very good technology and unquestionably have a place in refractive surgery, whether for clear lens extraction or cataracts.Patients can expect excellent outcomes and surgeons can expect patients to be very satisfied with surgical outcomes. Four groups multifocal lenses provided excellent distance, intermediate and near vision, but several measures indicated that the PanOptix and at lisa tri lens provided better vision in all distances. Spectacle independence was significantly higher with four groups. Multifocal IOL design might play a role in the postsurgical outcome, because better results were obtained with diffractive lenses. Although there were differences in the results of these four lenses in the study, all of the results were acceptable.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
141

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2013

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 11, 2013

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 25, 2018

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 5, 2018

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 18, 2019

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 14, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

April 18, 2022

Status Verified

June 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

6.3 years

First QC Date

January 25, 2018

Last Update Submit

April 10, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Contrast sensitivity

    mean postoperative contrast sensitivity in logarithmic scale under binocular mesopic and photopic conditions. There was no significant difference in the values obtained between at lisa tri and PanOptix at spatial frequencies of 1 cpd and 3, 6, 12, 18 cpd. Eyes with the PanOptix and at lisa tri IOL showed better contrast sensitivity than ReSTOR and Symfony at spatial frequencies of 1, 3, 6 cpd (P\<0.001) in photopic and mesopic conditions. The curves achieved with monocular vision were equivalent with binocular vision that was achieved.

    4 years

Study Arms (4)

AMO Tecnis Symfony

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Multifocal with extended range of vision, Diffractive, No Preloaded, Aspheric, +3.25 D near add and +2.17 D intermediate 6.0mm Hydrophilic -0.20 Has nine diffractive steps, The proprietary achromatic technology corrects chromatic aberration. This creates improved contrast sensitivity.

Device: multifocal intraocular lens IOLs

AcrySof ReSTOR (Alcon Laboratories)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Multifocal ,Diffractive, +3.00D and for Near, Aspheric, Has 9 steps (rings), Light: 41% for far; 41% for near: 18% reflected (lost). 6.0mm Silicone -0.10 Bifocal ,One piece,Blue filter ,Central diffractive region of 3.6\_mm for near and distance vision ,Apodised ,peripheral refractive region is dedicated to distance vision

Device: multifocal intraocular lens IOLs

AT Lisa tri (CarlZeiss Meditec AG)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Trifocal, diffractive, +3.33 D near add and +1.66 D intermediate add at the IOL plane, aspheric (aberration correcting) Optic Diameter 6.0 mm Total Diameter 11.0 mm Haptic Angulation 0° Lens Design Single-piece, MICS Incision Size 1.8 mm Company Labeled A-Constant1 118.6 Diopter Range 0.0 to +32.0 D, 0.5 D increments ACD 5.32

Device: multifocal intraocular lens IOLs

PanOptix(Alcon Laboratories)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Trifocal,Difractive,+3.25D Near,+2.17 D intermediate 6.0mm hydrophobic -0.27 One piece ,aspheric , Focal 4.5 mm (15 diffractive zones)

Device: multifocal intraocular lens IOLs

Interventions

clinical outcome of different multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients with presbyopia or cataracts

AMO Tecnis SymfonyAT Lisa tri (CarlZeiss Meditec AG)AcrySof ReSTOR (Alcon Laboratories)PanOptix(Alcon Laboratories)

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Preoperative BCVA (distance) more impacted than 20/40
  • Glare VA test comes about worse than 20/40, or practically impairing dissensions about their vision.
  • By reviewing and judging the researchers, individuals also had a potential need for visual acuity of 20/30 or better after surgery.
  • Express a want for multifocal vision, and be ready and ready to conform to the investigation necessities

You may not qualify if:

  • Excluded from entry were subjects with regular astigmatism greater than 1.5 D or irregular astigmatism.
  • Large pupil
  • Corneal transplant surgery or previous glaucoma-filtering,
  • A history of retinal detachments.
  • Also excluded were patients with other clinically non-cataract ocular abnormality (e.g. chronic drug-induced miosis,
  • Endothelial disease
  • Iris neovascularization, and amblyopia)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cataract

Interventions

Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lens DiseasesEye Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lenses, IntraocularLensesOptical DevicesEquipment and SuppliesProstheses and Implants

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Ophthalmologist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2018

First Posted

March 5, 2018

Study Start

August 11, 2013

Primary Completion

November 18, 2019

Study Completion

January 14, 2020

Last Updated

April 18, 2022

Record last verified: 2020-06