Accuracy of AOBP in a Chinese Population
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Positive and Negative Predictive Values of Automatic Office Blood Pressure Measurement and Traditional Office Blood Pressure Measurement in a Chinese Population
1 other identifier
observational
149
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: Traditional office blood pressure (BP) measurement is often inaccurate and is inferior to out-of-office measurements, such as ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), in predicting cardiovascular outcomes. A relatively new BP measurement method, called Automatic Office Blood Pressure measurement (AOBP), may provide similar BP readings to ABPM (latest clinical gold standard for BP measurements) and can easily be conducted in clinics. AOBP machines measure BP repeatedly 3-5 times with 1-min intervals and automatically provide the mean BP value. While AOBP was used in landmark trials (e.g. SPRINT trial) and was shown to eliminate white-coat effect, AOBP is rarely used in Hong Kong partly because there is no data concerning the accuracy of AOBP in Chinese. Almost all previous AOBP research used BpTRU (AOBP model), but BpTRU manufacturer was shut down permanently. Aim: To assess if WatchBP Office (another AOBP model) has superior diagnostic accuracy than traditional office BP measurements, when compared to ABPM readings. Method: 150 Chinese adult patients with a diagnosis of essential hypertension will be recruited consecutively from a Government-funded primary care clinic. All patients will have their BP measured by a 48-hour ABPM, a WatchBP office, and two traditional office blood pressure measurements. ABPM will be considered the gold standard; sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of AOBP and traditional BP to diagnose elevated BP level, masked hypertension and white-coat hypertension will be calculated and compared Implication: if WatchBP provides closer BP readings to ABPM, this can lead to its implementation in routine clinical practice
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jun 2018
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 5, 2018
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 30, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 29, 2019
CompletedDecember 15, 2025
September 1, 2020
1.5 years
February 27, 2018
December 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
compare BP readings from AOBPs, ABPM, and traditional office BP
mean difference of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) between AOBP machines (WatchBP Office, BpTRU)/office BP and daytime ABPM will be compared by the two-tailed t-test; A Bland-Altman type plot will be shown for both comparisons. Pearson correlations will be used to compare mean readings of office BP, AOBP and daytime ABPM.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
sensitivity/specificity, positive and negative predictive value of AOBP vs traditional BP measurement
1 year
Study Arms (1)
Hypertensive patients
150 Chinese patients with a diagnosis of essential hypertension from a primary care clinic
Interventions
BP measurement: The nurse or assistant will leave the room after confirmed validity and the WatchBP will automatically measure BP for the participant at 1-minute intervals for 3 more readings; previous research showed that accurate BP readings could be obtained using 1-minute intervals. This is also the measuring method suggested by the manufacturer. The machine will automatically calculate the mean BP using the 3 readings. The mean BP value will be used for analysis. The diagnostic cutoff for diagnosing HT will be ≥135/85 for AOBP
Eligibility Criteria
Hypertensive patients in primary care
You may qualify if:
- diagnosis of essential hypertension
You may not qualify if:
- (i) severe hypertension as defined by clinical systolic BP ≥180 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥110 mmHg (because they may need emergency treatment and it is unethical to delay such treatment due to the proposed project), (ii) inability to provide consent, (iii) pregnancy, (iv) night-time occupations (we need to compare AOBP and clinic BP readings to daytime ABPM average when the patient should be awake), (v) are occupational drivers (because potential dangers in driving could occur when patients are asked to remain still), (vi) receiving anti-coagulants (to prevent bruises when using ABPM), (vii) with known atrial fibrillation (as ABPMs and AOBP use have not been validated in this group)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lek Yuen Clinic
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2018
First Posted
March 5, 2018
Study Start
June 30, 2018
Primary Completion
December 29, 2019
Study Completion
December 29, 2019
Last Updated
December 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2020-09